Shear Bond Strength of Veneering Composite Versus Different Polyetheretherketone Materials after Various Surface Treatments: An In-vitro Study
Introduction: Polyetheretherketone, also known as PEEK, is a semicrystalline thermoplastic material with many advantages. Since its grey material, it has to veneering with composite resin to enhance its aesthetic appeal. Bonding PEEK and composite veneers poses challenges due to its inert surfac...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/18932/64369_CE[Ra1]_F[SK]_QC_PAT.(SD_RN_SHU)_PF1(RI_KM_OM)_PFA(RI_KM)_PN(KM).pdf |
| _version_ | 1797357465856114688 |
|---|---|
| author | VENKATASUBRAMANIAN VISHNUPRIYA N VIDHYASANKARI CHALAKUZHIYIL ABRAHAM MATHEW MARAPPAN MAHESHWARAN KRISHNAN RAJKUMAR KATTURKARAN ANTONISAMY BIJU SHANMUGAM SAKTHIGNANAVEL VIJAYAKUMAR VIJAYALAKSHMI |
| author_facet | VENKATASUBRAMANIAN VISHNUPRIYA N VIDHYASANKARI CHALAKUZHIYIL ABRAHAM MATHEW MARAPPAN MAHESHWARAN KRISHNAN RAJKUMAR KATTURKARAN ANTONISAMY BIJU SHANMUGAM SAKTHIGNANAVEL VIJAYAKUMAR VIJAYALAKSHMI |
| author_sort | VENKATASUBRAMANIAN VISHNUPRIYA |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: Polyetheretherketone, also known as PEEK, is a
semicrystalline thermoplastic material with many advantages.
Since its grey material, it has to veneering with composite resin
to enhance its aesthetic appeal. Bonding PEEK and composite
veneers poses challenges due to its inert surface.
Aim: To assess and compare the Shear Bond Strength (SBS)
between various polyetheretherketone materials and veneering
composites following various surface treatments.
Materials and Methods: The in-vitro study was conducted at
KSR Dental College and Hospital in Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu,
India, over a period of three months from December 2022 to
February 2023. A total of 108 PEEK discs were prepared for
the study, divided into three groups: unfilled PEEK, 30% carbon
reinforced PEEK, and 10% carbon + 10% graphite + 10%
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) reinforced PEEK. The specimens
underwent different surface treatments, including no treatment,
sandblasting with 110 um alumina particles, and acid etching
with 98% sulphuric acid. Additionally, 108 composite discs were
prepared and bonded to the PEEK specimens using adhesive
and resin cement. The bonded specimens were immersed in
distilled water for 24 hours, and the Shear Bond Strength (SBS)
was determined using a universal testing machine. Statistical
analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, and mean
values were compared using posthoc tests.
Results: The results indicated significant variation in SBS
among the three groups without treatment (p=0.011) and after
sandblasting with 110 um alumina (p=<0.001). The 30% carbon
reinforced PEEK exhibited the highest SBS regardless of the
surface treatments.
Conclusion: Among the tested materials, 30% carbon
reinforced PEEK demonstrated the highest SBS, regardless of
the surface treatments. Acid etching yielded the highest SBS
among the various surface treatments, irrespective of the type
of PEEK material used. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T14:45:33Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f9e91f17d929412789f6a9aaeabaaeb5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2249-782X 0973-709X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T14:45:33Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-f9e91f17d929412789f6a9aaeabaaeb52024-01-11T11:11:14ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2024-01-011801424510.7860/JCDR/2024/64369.18932Shear Bond Strength of Veneering Composite Versus Different Polyetheretherketone Materials after Various Surface Treatments: An In-vitro StudyVENKATASUBRAMANIAN VISHNUPRIYA0N VIDHYASANKARI1CHALAKUZHIYIL ABRAHAM MATHEW2MARAPPAN MAHESHWARAN3KRISHNAN RAJKUMAR4KATTURKARAN ANTONISAMY BIJU5SHANMUGAM SAKTHIGNANAVEL6VIJAYAKUMAR VIJAYALAKSHMI7Student, Department of Prosthodontics, KSR Institute of Dental Science and Research, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India.Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, KSR Institute of Dental Science and Research, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India.Head and Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, KSR Institute of Dental Science and Research, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India.Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, KSR Institute of Dental Science and Research, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India.Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, KSR Institute of Dental Science and Research, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India.Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, KSR Institute of Dental Science and Research, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India.Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, KSR Institute of Dental Science and Research, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India.Student, Department of Prosthodontics, KSR Institute of Dental Science and Research, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India.Introduction: Polyetheretherketone, also known as PEEK, is a semicrystalline thermoplastic material with many advantages. Since its grey material, it has to veneering with composite resin to enhance its aesthetic appeal. Bonding PEEK and composite veneers poses challenges due to its inert surface. Aim: To assess and compare the Shear Bond Strength (SBS) between various polyetheretherketone materials and veneering composites following various surface treatments. Materials and Methods: The in-vitro study was conducted at KSR Dental College and Hospital in Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India, over a period of three months from December 2022 to February 2023. A total of 108 PEEK discs were prepared for the study, divided into three groups: unfilled PEEK, 30% carbon reinforced PEEK, and 10% carbon + 10% graphite + 10% Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) reinforced PEEK. The specimens underwent different surface treatments, including no treatment, sandblasting with 110 um alumina particles, and acid etching with 98% sulphuric acid. Additionally, 108 composite discs were prepared and bonded to the PEEK specimens using adhesive and resin cement. The bonded specimens were immersed in distilled water for 24 hours, and the Shear Bond Strength (SBS) was determined using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, and mean values were compared using posthoc tests. Results: The results indicated significant variation in SBS among the three groups without treatment (p=0.011) and after sandblasting with 110 um alumina (p=<0.001). The 30% carbon reinforced PEEK exhibited the highest SBS regardless of the surface treatments. Conclusion: Among the tested materials, 30% carbon reinforced PEEK demonstrated the highest SBS, regardless of the surface treatments. Acid etching yielded the highest SBS among the various surface treatments, irrespective of the type of PEEK material used.https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/18932/64369_CE[Ra1]_F[SK]_QC_PAT.(SD_RN_SHU)_PF1(RI_KM_OM)_PFA(RI_KM)_PN(KM).pdfacid etchingair abrasionaluminasandblasting |
| spellingShingle | VENKATASUBRAMANIAN VISHNUPRIYA N VIDHYASANKARI CHALAKUZHIYIL ABRAHAM MATHEW MARAPPAN MAHESHWARAN KRISHNAN RAJKUMAR KATTURKARAN ANTONISAMY BIJU SHANMUGAM SAKTHIGNANAVEL VIJAYAKUMAR VIJAYALAKSHMI Shear Bond Strength of Veneering Composite Versus Different Polyetheretherketone Materials after Various Surface Treatments: An In-vitro Study Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research acid etching air abrasion alumina sandblasting |
| title | Shear Bond Strength of Veneering Composite Versus Different Polyetheretherketone Materials after Various Surface Treatments: An In-vitro Study |
| title_full | Shear Bond Strength of Veneering Composite Versus Different Polyetheretherketone Materials after Various Surface Treatments: An In-vitro Study |
| title_fullStr | Shear Bond Strength of Veneering Composite Versus Different Polyetheretherketone Materials after Various Surface Treatments: An In-vitro Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Shear Bond Strength of Veneering Composite Versus Different Polyetheretherketone Materials after Various Surface Treatments: An In-vitro Study |
| title_short | Shear Bond Strength of Veneering Composite Versus Different Polyetheretherketone Materials after Various Surface Treatments: An In-vitro Study |
| title_sort | shear bond strength of veneering composite versus different polyetheretherketone materials after various surface treatments an in vitro study |
| topic | acid etching air abrasion alumina sandblasting |
| url | https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/18932/64369_CE[Ra1]_F[SK]_QC_PAT.(SD_RN_SHU)_PF1(RI_KM_OM)_PFA(RI_KM)_PN(KM).pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT venkatasubramanianvishnupriya shearbondstrengthofveneeringcompositeversusdifferentpolyetheretherketonematerialsaftervarioussurfacetreatmentsaninvitrostudy AT nvidhyasankari shearbondstrengthofveneeringcompositeversusdifferentpolyetheretherketonematerialsaftervarioussurfacetreatmentsaninvitrostudy AT chalakuzhiyilabrahammathew shearbondstrengthofveneeringcompositeversusdifferentpolyetheretherketonematerialsaftervarioussurfacetreatmentsaninvitrostudy AT marappanmaheshwaran shearbondstrengthofveneeringcompositeversusdifferentpolyetheretherketonematerialsaftervarioussurfacetreatmentsaninvitrostudy AT krishnanrajkumar shearbondstrengthofveneeringcompositeversusdifferentpolyetheretherketonematerialsaftervarioussurfacetreatmentsaninvitrostudy AT katturkaranantonisamybiju shearbondstrengthofveneeringcompositeversusdifferentpolyetheretherketonematerialsaftervarioussurfacetreatmentsaninvitrostudy AT shanmugamsakthignanavel shearbondstrengthofveneeringcompositeversusdifferentpolyetheretherketonematerialsaftervarioussurfacetreatmentsaninvitrostudy AT vijayakumarvijayalakshmi shearbondstrengthofveneeringcompositeversusdifferentpolyetheretherketonematerialsaftervarioussurfacetreatmentsaninvitrostudy |