Improving the Detection of Individuals at Clinical Risk for Psychosis in the Community, Primary and Secondary Care: An Integrated Evidence-Based Approach

Background: The first rate-limiting step for improving outcomes of psychosis through preventive interventions in people at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) is the ability to accurately detect individuals who are at risk for the development of this disorder. Currently, this detection power is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paolo Fusar-Poli, Sarah A. Sullivan, Jai L. Shah, Peter J. Uhlhaas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00774/full
_version_ 1818554975799738368
author Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Sarah A. Sullivan
Jai L. Shah
Jai L. Shah
Jai L. Shah
Peter J. Uhlhaas
Peter J. Uhlhaas
author_facet Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Sarah A. Sullivan
Jai L. Shah
Jai L. Shah
Jai L. Shah
Peter J. Uhlhaas
Peter J. Uhlhaas
author_sort Paolo Fusar-Poli
collection DOAJ
description Background: The first rate-limiting step for improving outcomes of psychosis through preventive interventions in people at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) is the ability to accurately detect individuals who are at risk for the development of this disorder. Currently, this detection power is sub-optimal.Methods: This is a conceptual and nonsystematic review of the literature, focusing on the work conducted by leading research teams in the field. The results will be structured in the following sections: understanding the CHR-P assessment, validity of the CHR-P as a universal risk state for psychosis, and improving the detection of at-risk individuals in secondary mental health care, in primary care, and in the community.Results: CHR-P instruments can provide adequate prognostic accuracy for the prediction of psychosis provided that they are employed in samples who have undergone risk enrichment during recruitment. This substantially limits their detection power in real-world settings. Furthermore, there is initial evidence that not all cases of psychosis onset are preceded by a CHR-P stage. A transdiagnostic individualized risk calculator could be used to automatically screen secondary mental health care medical notes to detect those at risk of psychosis and refer them to standard CHR-P assessment. Similar risk estimation tools for use in primary care are under development and promise to boost the detection of patients at risk in this setting. To improve the detection of young people who may be at risk of psychosis in the community, it is necessary to adopt digital and/or sequential screening approaches. These solutions are based on recent scientific evidence and have potential for implementation internationally.Conclusions: The best strategy to improve the detection of patients at risk for psychosis is to implement a clinical research program that integrates different but complementary detection approaches across community, primary, and secondary care. These solutions are based on recent scientific advancements in the development of risk estimation tools and e-health approaches and have the potential to be applied across different clinical settings.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T09:47:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f9f083d70243475dbed636e01ff158b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T09:47:11Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-f9f083d70243475dbed636e01ff158b92022-12-22T00:28:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402019-10-011010.3389/fpsyt.2019.00774483340Improving the Detection of Individuals at Clinical Risk for Psychosis in the Community, Primary and Secondary Care: An Integrated Evidence-Based ApproachPaolo Fusar-Poli0Paolo Fusar-Poli1Paolo Fusar-Poli2Paolo Fusar-Poli3Sarah A. Sullivan4Jai L. Shah5Jai L. Shah6Jai L. Shah7Peter J. Uhlhaas8Peter J. Uhlhaas9Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United KingdomOASIS service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, ItalyNational Institute for Health Research Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomCentre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United KingdomPrevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, QC, CanadaACCESS Open Minds (Pan-Canadian Youth Mental Health Services Research Network), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, CanadaDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, CanadaInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom0Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, GermanyBackground: The first rate-limiting step for improving outcomes of psychosis through preventive interventions in people at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) is the ability to accurately detect individuals who are at risk for the development of this disorder. Currently, this detection power is sub-optimal.Methods: This is a conceptual and nonsystematic review of the literature, focusing on the work conducted by leading research teams in the field. The results will be structured in the following sections: understanding the CHR-P assessment, validity of the CHR-P as a universal risk state for psychosis, and improving the detection of at-risk individuals in secondary mental health care, in primary care, and in the community.Results: CHR-P instruments can provide adequate prognostic accuracy for the prediction of psychosis provided that they are employed in samples who have undergone risk enrichment during recruitment. This substantially limits their detection power in real-world settings. Furthermore, there is initial evidence that not all cases of psychosis onset are preceded by a CHR-P stage. A transdiagnostic individualized risk calculator could be used to automatically screen secondary mental health care medical notes to detect those at risk of psychosis and refer them to standard CHR-P assessment. Similar risk estimation tools for use in primary care are under development and promise to boost the detection of patients at risk in this setting. To improve the detection of young people who may be at risk of psychosis in the community, it is necessary to adopt digital and/or sequential screening approaches. These solutions are based on recent scientific evidence and have potential for implementation internationally.Conclusions: The best strategy to improve the detection of patients at risk for psychosis is to implement a clinical research program that integrates different but complementary detection approaches across community, primary, and secondary care. These solutions are based on recent scientific advancements in the development of risk estimation tools and e-health approaches and have the potential to be applied across different clinical settings.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00774/fullClinical high riskdetectione-healthpreventionpsychosisrisk
spellingShingle Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Sarah A. Sullivan
Jai L. Shah
Jai L. Shah
Jai L. Shah
Peter J. Uhlhaas
Peter J. Uhlhaas
Improving the Detection of Individuals at Clinical Risk for Psychosis in the Community, Primary and Secondary Care: An Integrated Evidence-Based Approach
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Clinical high risk
detection
e-health
prevention
psychosis
risk
title Improving the Detection of Individuals at Clinical Risk for Psychosis in the Community, Primary and Secondary Care: An Integrated Evidence-Based Approach
title_full Improving the Detection of Individuals at Clinical Risk for Psychosis in the Community, Primary and Secondary Care: An Integrated Evidence-Based Approach
title_fullStr Improving the Detection of Individuals at Clinical Risk for Psychosis in the Community, Primary and Secondary Care: An Integrated Evidence-Based Approach
title_full_unstemmed Improving the Detection of Individuals at Clinical Risk for Psychosis in the Community, Primary and Secondary Care: An Integrated Evidence-Based Approach
title_short Improving the Detection of Individuals at Clinical Risk for Psychosis in the Community, Primary and Secondary Care: An Integrated Evidence-Based Approach
title_sort improving the detection of individuals at clinical risk for psychosis in the community primary and secondary care an integrated evidence based approach
topic Clinical high risk
detection
e-health
prevention
psychosis
risk
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00774/full
work_keys_str_mv AT paolofusarpoli improvingthedetectionofindividualsatclinicalriskforpsychosisinthecommunityprimaryandsecondarycareanintegratedevidencebasedapproach
AT paolofusarpoli improvingthedetectionofindividualsatclinicalriskforpsychosisinthecommunityprimaryandsecondarycareanintegratedevidencebasedapproach
AT paolofusarpoli improvingthedetectionofindividualsatclinicalriskforpsychosisinthecommunityprimaryandsecondarycareanintegratedevidencebasedapproach
AT paolofusarpoli improvingthedetectionofindividualsatclinicalriskforpsychosisinthecommunityprimaryandsecondarycareanintegratedevidencebasedapproach
AT sarahasullivan improvingthedetectionofindividualsatclinicalriskforpsychosisinthecommunityprimaryandsecondarycareanintegratedevidencebasedapproach
AT jailshah improvingthedetectionofindividualsatclinicalriskforpsychosisinthecommunityprimaryandsecondarycareanintegratedevidencebasedapproach
AT jailshah improvingthedetectionofindividualsatclinicalriskforpsychosisinthecommunityprimaryandsecondarycareanintegratedevidencebasedapproach
AT jailshah improvingthedetectionofindividualsatclinicalriskforpsychosisinthecommunityprimaryandsecondarycareanintegratedevidencebasedapproach
AT peterjuhlhaas improvingthedetectionofindividualsatclinicalriskforpsychosisinthecommunityprimaryandsecondarycareanintegratedevidencebasedapproach
AT peterjuhlhaas improvingthedetectionofindividualsatclinicalriskforpsychosisinthecommunityprimaryandsecondarycareanintegratedevidencebasedapproach