Biases and power for groups comparison on subjective health measurements.
Subjective health measurements are increasingly used in clinical research, particularly for patient groups comparisons. Two main types of analytical strategies can be used for such data: so-called classical test theory (CTT), relying on observed scores and models coming from Item Response Theory (IR...
Main Authors: | Jean-François Hamel, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Tanguy Le Neel, Gildas Kubis, Yves Roquelaure, Véronique Sébille |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3480365?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Methodological issues regarding power of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT)-based approaches for the comparison of patient-reported outcomes in two groups of patients - a simulation study
by: Boyer François, et al.
Published: (2010-03-01) -
Power and sample size determination for the group comparison of patient-reported outcomes with Rasch family models.
by: Myriam Blanchin, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
How to Investigate the Effects of Groups on Changes in Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcomes and Response Shift Using Rasch Models
by: Karima Hammas, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Identification of sources of DIF using covariates in patient-reported outcome measures: a simulation study comparing two approaches based on Rasch family models
by: Yseulys Dubuy, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
Power and sample size determination in the Rasch model: evaluation of the robustness of a numerical method to non-normality of the latent trait.
by: Alice Guilleux, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)