A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis

When the Expanded Programme on Immunization was established and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) was introduced for developing countries to use exclusively, national leaders of public health had no opportunity to make an informed choice between OPV and the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). Today, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John T. Jacob
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The World Health Organization 2004-01-01
Series:Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862004000100011
_version_ 1797282332785246208
author John T. Jacob
author_facet John T. Jacob
author_sort John T. Jacob
collection DOAJ
description When the Expanded Programme on Immunization was established and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) was introduced for developing countries to use exclusively, national leaders of public health had no opportunity to make an informed choice between OPV and the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). Today, as progress is made towards the goal of global eradication of poliomyelitis attributable to wild polioviruses, all developing countries where OPV is used face the risk of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP). Until recently, awareness of VAPP has been poor and quantitative risk analysis scanty but it is now well known that the continued use of OPV perpetuates the risk of VAPP. Discontinuation or declining immunization coverage of OPV will increase the risk of emergence of circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPV) that re-acquire wild virus-like properties and may cause outbreaks of polio. To eliminate the risk of cVDPV, either very high immunization coverage must be maintained as long as OPV is in use, or IPV should replace OPV. Stopping OPV without first achieving high immunization coverage with IPV is unwise on account of the possibility of emergence of cVDPV. Increasing numbers of developed nations prefer IPV, and manufacturing capacities have not been scaled up, so its price remains prohibitively high and unaffordable by developing countries, where, in addition, large-scale field experience with IPV is lacking. Under these circumstances, a policy shift to increase the use of IPV in national immunization programmes in developing countries is a necessary first step; once IPV coverage reaches high levels (over 85%), the withdrawal of OPV may begin.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T17:11:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fa1145883f194fdba5898cbb258fd653
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0042-9686
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T17:11:17Z
publishDate 2004-01-01
publisher The World Health Organization
record_format Article
series Bulletin of the World Health Organization
spelling doaj.art-fa1145883f194fdba5898cbb258fd6532024-03-03T01:14:52ZengThe World Health OrganizationBulletin of the World Health Organization0042-96862004-01-018215357A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitisJohn T. JacobWhen the Expanded Programme on Immunization was established and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) was introduced for developing countries to use exclusively, national leaders of public health had no opportunity to make an informed choice between OPV and the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). Today, as progress is made towards the goal of global eradication of poliomyelitis attributable to wild polioviruses, all developing countries where OPV is used face the risk of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP). Until recently, awareness of VAPP has been poor and quantitative risk analysis scanty but it is now well known that the continued use of OPV perpetuates the risk of VAPP. Discontinuation or declining immunization coverage of OPV will increase the risk of emergence of circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPV) that re-acquire wild virus-like properties and may cause outbreaks of polio. To eliminate the risk of cVDPV, either very high immunization coverage must be maintained as long as OPV is in use, or IPV should replace OPV. Stopping OPV without first achieving high immunization coverage with IPV is unwise on account of the possibility of emergence of cVDPV. Increasing numbers of developed nations prefer IPV, and manufacturing capacities have not been scaled up, so its price remains prohibitively high and unaffordable by developing countries, where, in addition, large-scale field experience with IPV is lacking. Under these circumstances, a policy shift to increase the use of IPV in national immunization programmes in developing countries is a necessary first step; once IPV coverage reaches high levels (over 85%), the withdrawal of OPV may begin.http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862004000100011Poliovirus vaccine, Oral/adverse effectsPoliomyelitis/epidemiologyPoliomyelitis/chemically inducedPoliovirus vaccine, Inactivated/therapeutic usePoliovirus vaccine, Inactivated/economicsPoliovirus/drug effectsImmunization programsDeveloping countries
spellingShingle John T. Jacob
A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Poliovirus vaccine, Oral/adverse effects
Poliomyelitis/epidemiology
Poliomyelitis/chemically induced
Poliovirus vaccine, Inactivated/therapeutic use
Poliovirus vaccine, Inactivated/economics
Poliovirus/drug effects
Immunization programs
Developing countries
title A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
title_full A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
title_fullStr A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
title_full_unstemmed A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
title_short A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
title_sort developing country perspective on vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis
topic Poliovirus vaccine, Oral/adverse effects
Poliomyelitis/epidemiology
Poliomyelitis/chemically induced
Poliovirus vaccine, Inactivated/therapeutic use
Poliovirus vaccine, Inactivated/economics
Poliovirus/drug effects
Immunization programs
Developing countries
url http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862004000100011
work_keys_str_mv AT johntjacob adevelopingcountryperspectiveonvaccineassociatedparalyticpoliomyelitis
AT johntjacob developingcountryperspectiveonvaccineassociatedparalyticpoliomyelitis