Determinants of In‐Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Machine Learning Approach

Background The ability to accurately predict the occurrence of in‐hospital death after percutaneous coronary intervention is important for clinical decision‐making. We sought to utilize the New York Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System in order to elucidate the determinants of in‐hosp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Subhi J. Al'Aref, Gurpreet Singh, Alexander R. van Rosendael, Kranthi K. Kolli, Xiaoyue Ma, Gabriel Maliakal, Mohit Pandey, Bejamin C. Lee, Jing Wang, Zhuoran Xu, Yiye Zhang, James K. Min, S. Chiu Wong, Robert M. Minutello
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.011160
_version_ 1818775831865982976
author Subhi J. Al'Aref
Gurpreet Singh
Alexander R. van Rosendael
Kranthi K. Kolli
Xiaoyue Ma
Gabriel Maliakal
Mohit Pandey
Bejamin C. Lee
Jing Wang
Zhuoran Xu
Yiye Zhang
James K. Min
S. Chiu Wong
Robert M. Minutello
author_facet Subhi J. Al'Aref
Gurpreet Singh
Alexander R. van Rosendael
Kranthi K. Kolli
Xiaoyue Ma
Gabriel Maliakal
Mohit Pandey
Bejamin C. Lee
Jing Wang
Zhuoran Xu
Yiye Zhang
James K. Min
S. Chiu Wong
Robert M. Minutello
author_sort Subhi J. Al'Aref
collection DOAJ
description Background The ability to accurately predict the occurrence of in‐hospital death after percutaneous coronary intervention is important for clinical decision‐making. We sought to utilize the New York Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System in order to elucidate the determinants of in‐hospital mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention across New York State. Methods and Results We examined 479 804 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention between 2004 and 2012, utilizing traditional and advanced machine learning algorithms to determine the most significant predictors of in‐hospital mortality. The entire data were randomly split into a training (80%) and a testing set (20%). Tuned hyperparameters were used to generate a trained model while the performance of the model was independently evaluated on the testing set after plotting a receiver‐operator characteristic curve and using the output measure of the area under the curve (AUC) and the associated 95% CIs. Mean age was 65.2±11.9 years and 68.5% were women. There were 2549 in‐hospital deaths within the patient population. A boosted ensemble algorithm (AdaBoost) had optimal discrimination with AUC of 0.927 (95% CI 0.923–0.929) compared with AUC of 0.913 for XGBoost (95% CI 0.906–0.919, P=0.02), AUC of 0.892 for Random Forest (95% CI 0.889–0.896, P<0.01), and AUC of 0.908 for logistic regression (95% CI 0.907–0.910, P<0.01). The 2 most significant predictors were age and ejection fraction. Conclusions A big data approach that utilizes advanced machine learning algorithms identifies new associations among risk factors and provides high accuracy for the prediction of in‐hospital mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T11:03:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fa191a01361c45a281cb592c6c90ee52
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T11:03:18Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-fa191a01361c45a281cb592c6c90ee522022-12-21T21:10:10ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802019-03-018510.1161/JAHA.118.011160Determinants of In‐Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Machine Learning ApproachSubhi J. Al'Aref0Gurpreet Singh1Alexander R. van Rosendael2Kranthi K. Kolli3Xiaoyue Ma4Gabriel Maliakal5Mohit Pandey6Bejamin C. Lee7Jing Wang8Zhuoran Xu9Yiye Zhang10James K. Min11S. Chiu Wong12Robert M. Minutello13Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging New York‐Presbyterian Hospital New York NYDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging New York‐Presbyterian Hospital New York NYDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging New York‐Presbyterian Hospital New York NYDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging New York‐Presbyterian Hospital New York NYDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging New York‐Presbyterian Hospital New York NYDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging New York‐Presbyterian Hospital New York NYDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging New York‐Presbyterian Hospital New York NYDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging New York‐Presbyterian Hospital New York NYDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging New York‐Presbyterian Hospital New York NYDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging New York‐Presbyterian Hospital New York NYDivision of Health Informatics Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences New York NYDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging New York‐Presbyterian Hospital New York NYDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine Weill Cornell Medicine New York NYDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine Weill Cornell Medicine New York NYBackground The ability to accurately predict the occurrence of in‐hospital death after percutaneous coronary intervention is important for clinical decision‐making. We sought to utilize the New York Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System in order to elucidate the determinants of in‐hospital mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention across New York State. Methods and Results We examined 479 804 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention between 2004 and 2012, utilizing traditional and advanced machine learning algorithms to determine the most significant predictors of in‐hospital mortality. The entire data were randomly split into a training (80%) and a testing set (20%). Tuned hyperparameters were used to generate a trained model while the performance of the model was independently evaluated on the testing set after plotting a receiver‐operator characteristic curve and using the output measure of the area under the curve (AUC) and the associated 95% CIs. Mean age was 65.2±11.9 years and 68.5% were women. There were 2549 in‐hospital deaths within the patient population. A boosted ensemble algorithm (AdaBoost) had optimal discrimination with AUC of 0.927 (95% CI 0.923–0.929) compared with AUC of 0.913 for XGBoost (95% CI 0.906–0.919, P=0.02), AUC of 0.892 for Random Forest (95% CI 0.889–0.896, P<0.01), and AUC of 0.908 for logistic regression (95% CI 0.907–0.910, P<0.01). The 2 most significant predictors were age and ejection fraction. Conclusions A big data approach that utilizes advanced machine learning algorithms identifies new associations among risk factors and provides high accuracy for the prediction of in‐hospital mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.011160big data analyticsin‐hospital mortalitymachine learningpercutaneous coronary intervention
spellingShingle Subhi J. Al'Aref
Gurpreet Singh
Alexander R. van Rosendael
Kranthi K. Kolli
Xiaoyue Ma
Gabriel Maliakal
Mohit Pandey
Bejamin C. Lee
Jing Wang
Zhuoran Xu
Yiye Zhang
James K. Min
S. Chiu Wong
Robert M. Minutello
Determinants of In‐Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Machine Learning Approach
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
big data analytics
in‐hospital mortality
machine learning
percutaneous coronary intervention
title Determinants of In‐Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Machine Learning Approach
title_full Determinants of In‐Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Machine Learning Approach
title_fullStr Determinants of In‐Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Machine Learning Approach
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of In‐Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Machine Learning Approach
title_short Determinants of In‐Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Machine Learning Approach
title_sort determinants of in hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention a machine learning approach
topic big data analytics
in‐hospital mortality
machine learning
percutaneous coronary intervention
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.011160
work_keys_str_mv AT subhijalaref determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach
AT gurpreetsingh determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach
AT alexanderrvanrosendael determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach
AT kranthikkolli determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach
AT xiaoyuema determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach
AT gabrielmaliakal determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach
AT mohitpandey determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach
AT bejaminclee determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach
AT jingwang determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach
AT zhuoranxu determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach
AT yiyezhang determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach
AT jameskmin determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach
AT schiuwong determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach
AT robertmminutello determinantsofinhospitalmortalityafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamachinelearningapproach