Comparison of visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses with same material monofocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and monofocal IOLs made of the same material. METHODS: The subjects included patients implanted with either Tecnis® monofocal IOLs (ZA9003 or ZCB00) or Tecnis® multifocal IOLs (ZMA00 or ZMB00) bilaterally. We conducte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomofusa Yamauchi, Hitoshi Tabuchi, Kosuke Takase, Hideharu Ohsugi, Zaigen Ohara, Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3695892?pdf=render
_version_ 1818899006776934400
author Tomofusa Yamauchi
Hitoshi Tabuchi
Kosuke Takase
Hideharu Ohsugi
Zaigen Ohara
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
author_facet Tomofusa Yamauchi
Hitoshi Tabuchi
Kosuke Takase
Hideharu Ohsugi
Zaigen Ohara
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
author_sort Tomofusa Yamauchi
collection DOAJ
description PURPOSE: To compare the visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and monofocal IOLs made of the same material. METHODS: The subjects included patients implanted with either Tecnis® monofocal IOLs (ZA9003 or ZCB00) or Tecnis® multifocal IOLs (ZMA00 or ZMB00) bilaterally. We conducted a retrospective study comparing the two types of IOLs. The multifocal group included 46 patients who were implanted with Tecnis® multifocal IOLs bilaterally. The monofocal group was an age- and sex-matched control group, and included 85 patients who were implanted with Tecnis® monofocal IOLs bilaterally. Lens opacity grading, the radius of corneal curvature, corneal astigmatism, axial length and the refractive status were measured preoperatively. Pupil size, ocular aberrometry, distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, contrast sensitivity with and without glare and the responses to a quality-of-vision questionnaire were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: The uncorrected near visual acuity was significantly better in the multifocal group, whereas both the corrected intermediate and near visual acuity were better in the monofocal group. Contrast sensitivity (with and without glare) was significantly better in the monofocal group. The rate of spectacle dependency was significantly lower in the multifocal group. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding most items of the postoperative quality-of-vision questionnaire (VFQ-25), with the exception that the patients in the monofocal group reported fewer problems with nighttime driving. CONCLUSIONS: The multifocal IOLs used in this study reduced spectacle dependency more so than monofocal IOLs and did not compromise the subjective visual function, with the exception of nighttime driving.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T19:41:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fa1a757774bb496d8371812cde0ef1dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T19:41:06Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-fa1a757774bb496d8371812cde0ef1dc2022-12-21T20:08:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0186e6823610.1371/journal.pone.0068236Comparison of visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses with same material monofocal intraocular lenses.Tomofusa YamauchiHitoshi TabuchiKosuke TakaseHideharu OhsugiZaigen OharaYoshiaki KiuchiPURPOSE: To compare the visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and monofocal IOLs made of the same material. METHODS: The subjects included patients implanted with either Tecnis® monofocal IOLs (ZA9003 or ZCB00) or Tecnis® multifocal IOLs (ZMA00 or ZMB00) bilaterally. We conducted a retrospective study comparing the two types of IOLs. The multifocal group included 46 patients who were implanted with Tecnis® multifocal IOLs bilaterally. The monofocal group was an age- and sex-matched control group, and included 85 patients who were implanted with Tecnis® monofocal IOLs bilaterally. Lens opacity grading, the radius of corneal curvature, corneal astigmatism, axial length and the refractive status were measured preoperatively. Pupil size, ocular aberrometry, distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, contrast sensitivity with and without glare and the responses to a quality-of-vision questionnaire were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: The uncorrected near visual acuity was significantly better in the multifocal group, whereas both the corrected intermediate and near visual acuity were better in the monofocal group. Contrast sensitivity (with and without glare) was significantly better in the monofocal group. The rate of spectacle dependency was significantly lower in the multifocal group. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding most items of the postoperative quality-of-vision questionnaire (VFQ-25), with the exception that the patients in the monofocal group reported fewer problems with nighttime driving. CONCLUSIONS: The multifocal IOLs used in this study reduced spectacle dependency more so than monofocal IOLs and did not compromise the subjective visual function, with the exception of nighttime driving.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3695892?pdf=render
spellingShingle Tomofusa Yamauchi
Hitoshi Tabuchi
Kosuke Takase
Hideharu Ohsugi
Zaigen Ohara
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Comparison of visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses with same material monofocal intraocular lenses.
PLoS ONE
title Comparison of visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses with same material monofocal intraocular lenses.
title_full Comparison of visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses with same material monofocal intraocular lenses.
title_fullStr Comparison of visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses with same material monofocal intraocular lenses.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses with same material monofocal intraocular lenses.
title_short Comparison of visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses with same material monofocal intraocular lenses.
title_sort comparison of visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses with same material monofocal intraocular lenses
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3695892?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT tomofusayamauchi comparisonofvisualperformanceofmultifocalintraocularlenseswithsamematerialmonofocalintraocularlenses
AT hitoshitabuchi comparisonofvisualperformanceofmultifocalintraocularlenseswithsamematerialmonofocalintraocularlenses
AT kosuketakase comparisonofvisualperformanceofmultifocalintraocularlenseswithsamematerialmonofocalintraocularlenses
AT hideharuohsugi comparisonofvisualperformanceofmultifocalintraocularlenseswithsamematerialmonofocalintraocularlenses
AT zaigenohara comparisonofvisualperformanceofmultifocalintraocularlenseswithsamematerialmonofocalintraocularlenses
AT yoshiakikiuchi comparisonofvisualperformanceofmultifocalintraocularlenseswithsamematerialmonofocalintraocularlenses