Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis

Abstract Background Growing concerns regarding the adverse effects of antibiotics during the first days of life and the marked reduction in the incidence of early-onset sepsis (EOS) are changing the clinical practice for managing neonates at risk of EOS. Strategies avoiding unnecessary antibiotics w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Vaccina, A. Luglio, M. Ceccoli, M. Lecis, F. Leone, T. Zini, G. Toni, L. Lugli, L. Lucaccioni, L. Iughetti, A. Berardi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-07-01
Series:Italian Journal of Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01107-3
_version_ 1819105804370837504
author E. Vaccina
A. Luglio
M. Ceccoli
M. Lecis
F. Leone
T. Zini
G. Toni
L. Lugli
L. Lucaccioni
L. Iughetti
A. Berardi
author_facet E. Vaccina
A. Luglio
M. Ceccoli
M. Lecis
F. Leone
T. Zini
G. Toni
L. Lugli
L. Lucaccioni
L. Iughetti
A. Berardi
author_sort E. Vaccina
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Growing concerns regarding the adverse effects of antibiotics during the first days of life and the marked reduction in the incidence of early-onset sepsis (EOS) are changing the clinical practice for managing neonates at risk of EOS. Strategies avoiding unnecessary antibiotics while promoting mother-infant bonding and breastfeeding deserve to be considered. Main body We compare strategies for managing newborns at risk of EOS recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which are among the most followed recommendations worldwide. Currently three different approaches are suggested in asymptomatic full-term or late preterm neonates: i) the conventional management, based on standard perinatal risk factors for EOS alone, ii) the neonatal sepsis calculator, a multivariate risk assessment based on individualized, quantitative risk estimates (relying on maternal risk factors for EOS) combined with physical examination findings at birth and in the following hours and iii) an approach entirely based on newborn clinical condition (serial clinical observation) during the first 48 h of life. We discuss advantages and limitations of these approaches, by analyzing studies supporting each strategy. Approximately 40% of infants who develop EOS cannot be identified on the basis of maternal RFs or laboratory tests, therefore close monitoring of the asymptomatic but at-risk infant remains crucial. A key question is to know what proportion of babies with mild, unspecific symptoms at birth can be managed safely without giving antibiotics. Conclusions Both neonatal sepsis calculator and serial clinical observation may miss cases of EOS, and clinical vigilance for all neonates is essential There is a need to assess which symptoms at birth are more predictive of EOS, and therefore require immediate interventions, or symptoms that can be carefully reevaluated without necessarily treat immediately the neonate with antibiotics. Studies comparing strategies for managing neonates are recommended.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T02:28:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fa2958d7151544d8a717c4779d0f2b76
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1824-7288
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T02:28:04Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Italian Journal of Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-fa2958d7151544d8a717c4779d0f2b762022-12-21T18:41:57ZengBMCItalian Journal of Pediatrics1824-72882021-07-014711510.1186/s13052-021-01107-3Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsisE. Vaccina0A. Luglio1M. Ceccoli2M. Lecis3F. Leone4T. Zini5G. Toni6L. Lugli7L. Lucaccioni8L. Iughetti9A. Berardi10Post Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaPost Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaPost Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaPost Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaPost Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaPost Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaPost Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaPediatric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaPediatric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaAbstract Background Growing concerns regarding the adverse effects of antibiotics during the first days of life and the marked reduction in the incidence of early-onset sepsis (EOS) are changing the clinical practice for managing neonates at risk of EOS. Strategies avoiding unnecessary antibiotics while promoting mother-infant bonding and breastfeeding deserve to be considered. Main body We compare strategies for managing newborns at risk of EOS recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which are among the most followed recommendations worldwide. Currently three different approaches are suggested in asymptomatic full-term or late preterm neonates: i) the conventional management, based on standard perinatal risk factors for EOS alone, ii) the neonatal sepsis calculator, a multivariate risk assessment based on individualized, quantitative risk estimates (relying on maternal risk factors for EOS) combined with physical examination findings at birth and in the following hours and iii) an approach entirely based on newborn clinical condition (serial clinical observation) during the first 48 h of life. We discuss advantages and limitations of these approaches, by analyzing studies supporting each strategy. Approximately 40% of infants who develop EOS cannot be identified on the basis of maternal RFs or laboratory tests, therefore close monitoring of the asymptomatic but at-risk infant remains crucial. A key question is to know what proportion of babies with mild, unspecific symptoms at birth can be managed safely without giving antibiotics. Conclusions Both neonatal sepsis calculator and serial clinical observation may miss cases of EOS, and clinical vigilance for all neonates is essential There is a need to assess which symptoms at birth are more predictive of EOS, and therefore require immediate interventions, or symptoms that can be carefully reevaluated without necessarily treat immediately the neonate with antibiotics. Studies comparing strategies for managing neonates are recommended.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01107-3NewbornEarly-onset sepsisGroup B streptococcusPreventionSerial clinical observationNeonatal Sepsis calculator
spellingShingle E. Vaccina
A. Luglio
M. Ceccoli
M. Lecis
F. Leone
T. Zini
G. Toni
L. Lugli
L. Lucaccioni
L. Iughetti
A. Berardi
Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis
Italian Journal of Pediatrics
Newborn
Early-onset sepsis
Group B streptococcus
Prevention
Serial clinical observation
Neonatal Sepsis calculator
title Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis
title_full Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis
title_fullStr Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis
title_full_unstemmed Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis
title_short Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis
title_sort brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early onset sepsis
topic Newborn
Early-onset sepsis
Group B streptococcus
Prevention
Serial clinical observation
Neonatal Sepsis calculator
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01107-3
work_keys_str_mv AT evaccina briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis
AT aluglio briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis
AT mceccoli briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis
AT mlecis briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis
AT fleone briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis
AT tzini briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis
AT gtoni briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis
AT llugli briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis
AT llucaccioni briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis
AT liughetti briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis
AT aberardi briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis