Comparison of orthopantomogram and lateral cephalogram for mandibular measurements

Aim: The aim of the present study is to clarify the possible application of orthopantomogram (OPG) for evaluating craniofacial specifications such as angular and linear measurements of the mandible by comparing with lateral cephalogram. Materials and Methods: OPG and lateral cephalogram were taken f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S Saravana Kumar, V Thailavathy, Daya Srinivasan, Divya Loganathan, J Yamini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2017;volume=9;issue=5;spage=92;epage=95;aulast=Kumar
_version_ 1819237819173830656
author S Saravana Kumar
V Thailavathy
Daya Srinivasan
Divya Loganathan
J Yamini
author_facet S Saravana Kumar
V Thailavathy
Daya Srinivasan
Divya Loganathan
J Yamini
author_sort S Saravana Kumar
collection DOAJ
description Aim: The aim of the present study is to clarify the possible application of orthopantomogram (OPG) for evaluating craniofacial specifications such as angular and linear measurements of the mandible by comparing with lateral cephalogram. Materials and Methods: OPG and lateral cephalogram were taken from 100 patients of age group 16–35 years from Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute. Linear measurements (body length and ramus height) and angular measurement (gonial angle) were assessed both in lateral cephalogram and OPG. Independent t-test was performed for comparison of OPG and lateral cephalogram using SPSS with a probability level of P < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant. Results: The results of the present study show that there is no statistically significant difference in ramus height and gonial angle when compared between OPG and lateral cephalogram while statistically significant difference exists for body length between OPG and lateral cephalogram. Conclusion: It may be concluded that panoramic radiography can be used to determine the gonial angle and ramus height as accurately as a lateral cephalogram. However, clinicians should be vigilant when predicting horizontal measurement from OPGs.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T13:26:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fa438d9b698246c68eb019f04ef9b5e5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0975-7406
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T13:26:23Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-fa438d9b698246c68eb019f04ef9b5e52022-12-21T17:45:18ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062017-01-0195929510.4103/jpbs.JPBS_98_17Comparison of orthopantomogram and lateral cephalogram for mandibular measurementsS Saravana KumarV ThailavathyDaya SrinivasanDivya LoganathanJ YaminiAim: The aim of the present study is to clarify the possible application of orthopantomogram (OPG) for evaluating craniofacial specifications such as angular and linear measurements of the mandible by comparing with lateral cephalogram. Materials and Methods: OPG and lateral cephalogram were taken from 100 patients of age group 16–35 years from Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute. Linear measurements (body length and ramus height) and angular measurement (gonial angle) were assessed both in lateral cephalogram and OPG. Independent t-test was performed for comparison of OPG and lateral cephalogram using SPSS with a probability level of P < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant. Results: The results of the present study show that there is no statistically significant difference in ramus height and gonial angle when compared between OPG and lateral cephalogram while statistically significant difference exists for body length between OPG and lateral cephalogram. Conclusion: It may be concluded that panoramic radiography can be used to determine the gonial angle and ramus height as accurately as a lateral cephalogram. However, clinicians should be vigilant when predicting horizontal measurement from OPGs.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2017;volume=9;issue=5;spage=92;epage=95;aulast=KumarOrthopantomogramlateral cephalogrammandibular measurements
spellingShingle S Saravana Kumar
V Thailavathy
Daya Srinivasan
Divya Loganathan
J Yamini
Comparison of orthopantomogram and lateral cephalogram for mandibular measurements
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Orthopantomogram
lateral cephalogram
mandibular measurements
title Comparison of orthopantomogram and lateral cephalogram for mandibular measurements
title_full Comparison of orthopantomogram and lateral cephalogram for mandibular measurements
title_fullStr Comparison of orthopantomogram and lateral cephalogram for mandibular measurements
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of orthopantomogram and lateral cephalogram for mandibular measurements
title_short Comparison of orthopantomogram and lateral cephalogram for mandibular measurements
title_sort comparison of orthopantomogram and lateral cephalogram for mandibular measurements
topic Orthopantomogram
lateral cephalogram
mandibular measurements
url http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2017;volume=9;issue=5;spage=92;epage=95;aulast=Kumar
work_keys_str_mv AT ssaravanakumar comparisonoforthopantomogramandlateralcephalogramformandibularmeasurements
AT vthailavathy comparisonoforthopantomogramandlateralcephalogramformandibularmeasurements
AT dayasrinivasan comparisonoforthopantomogramandlateralcephalogramformandibularmeasurements
AT divyaloganathan comparisonoforthopantomogramandlateralcephalogramformandibularmeasurements
AT jyamini comparisonoforthopantomogramandlateralcephalogramformandibularmeasurements