Impact of selective reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility testing report on clinicians’ prescribing behavior of antibiotics

Background: Selective reporting has important value in antibiotic management. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of AST selective reporting on prescribing behavior, so as to provide evidence for the implementation and improvement of selective reporting policies in microbiology labor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ying Wang, Xinping Zhang, Qian Zhou, Xiaojun Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2023.1225531/full
_version_ 1797671637350350848
author Ying Wang
Xinping Zhang
Qian Zhou
Xiaojun Xu
author_facet Ying Wang
Xinping Zhang
Qian Zhou
Xiaojun Xu
author_sort Ying Wang
collection DOAJ
description Background: Selective reporting has important value in antibiotic management. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of AST selective reporting on prescribing behavior, so as to provide evidence for the implementation and improvement of selective reporting policies in microbiology laboratories at home and abroad.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a teaching tertiary hospital in China in July 2021. We designed selective reports and routine reports for urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli and lower respiratory tract infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Questionnaires were conducted among participants by case vignettes, and 116 valid questionnaires were collected. The appropriateness rate of antibiotic prescription and the prescription rate of drug-resistant antibiotics, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and carbapenems were calculated and compared between the selective reporting group and the routine reporting group in each case.Results: In most cases, we found that AST selective reporting could increase the appropriateness rate of antibiotic prescription (p < 0.05) and reduce the drug-resistant antibiotic prescription rate (p < 0.01), cephalosporin drug prescription rate (p < 0.05) and fluoroquinolone drug prescription rate (p < 0.01). Although the difference in carbapenems prescription rate was not significant, selective reporting could reduce the number of its prescriptions to some extent.Conclusion: AST selective reporting can help promote the appropriate use of antibiotics and reduce the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. It is suggested to develop scientific and effective selective reporting practices and strengthen the two-way communication between clinicians and microbiology laboratories, thereby enabling microbiology laboratories to play a more important role in clinical antimicrobial management.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T21:18:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fa600569b9da4f29a27be120bd16f8f1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1663-9812
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T21:18:26Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-fa600569b9da4f29a27be120bd16f8f12023-09-28T13:01:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122023-09-011410.3389/fphar.2023.12255311225531Impact of selective reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility testing report on clinicians’ prescribing behavior of antibioticsYing Wang0Xinping Zhang1Qian Zhou2Xiaojun Xu3Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, ChinaSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, ChinaWuhan Children’s Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, ChinaThe First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, ChinaBackground: Selective reporting has important value in antibiotic management. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of AST selective reporting on prescribing behavior, so as to provide evidence for the implementation and improvement of selective reporting policies in microbiology laboratories at home and abroad.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a teaching tertiary hospital in China in July 2021. We designed selective reports and routine reports for urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli and lower respiratory tract infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Questionnaires were conducted among participants by case vignettes, and 116 valid questionnaires were collected. The appropriateness rate of antibiotic prescription and the prescription rate of drug-resistant antibiotics, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and carbapenems were calculated and compared between the selective reporting group and the routine reporting group in each case.Results: In most cases, we found that AST selective reporting could increase the appropriateness rate of antibiotic prescription (p < 0.05) and reduce the drug-resistant antibiotic prescription rate (p < 0.01), cephalosporin drug prescription rate (p < 0.05) and fluoroquinolone drug prescription rate (p < 0.01). Although the difference in carbapenems prescription rate was not significant, selective reporting could reduce the number of its prescriptions to some extent.Conclusion: AST selective reporting can help promote the appropriate use of antibiotics and reduce the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. It is suggested to develop scientific and effective selective reporting practices and strengthen the two-way communication between clinicians and microbiology laboratories, thereby enabling microbiology laboratories to play a more important role in clinical antimicrobial management.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2023.1225531/fullantimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) resultsselective reportingprescribing behaviorappropriateness rate of prescriptionantibiotic prescription
spellingShingle Ying Wang
Xinping Zhang
Qian Zhou
Xiaojun Xu
Impact of selective reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility testing report on clinicians’ prescribing behavior of antibiotics
Frontiers in Pharmacology
antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results
selective reporting
prescribing behavior
appropriateness rate of prescription
antibiotic prescription
title Impact of selective reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility testing report on clinicians’ prescribing behavior of antibiotics
title_full Impact of selective reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility testing report on clinicians’ prescribing behavior of antibiotics
title_fullStr Impact of selective reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility testing report on clinicians’ prescribing behavior of antibiotics
title_full_unstemmed Impact of selective reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility testing report on clinicians’ prescribing behavior of antibiotics
title_short Impact of selective reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility testing report on clinicians’ prescribing behavior of antibiotics
title_sort impact of selective reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility testing report on clinicians prescribing behavior of antibiotics
topic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results
selective reporting
prescribing behavior
appropriateness rate of prescription
antibiotic prescription
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2023.1225531/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yingwang impactofselectivereportingofantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingreportoncliniciansprescribingbehaviorofantibiotics
AT xinpingzhang impactofselectivereportingofantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingreportoncliniciansprescribingbehaviorofantibiotics
AT qianzhou impactofselectivereportingofantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingreportoncliniciansprescribingbehaviorofantibiotics
AT xiaojunxu impactofselectivereportingofantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingreportoncliniciansprescribingbehaviorofantibiotics