The Power and Limits of Reason: Al-Rāzī on the Possibility of General and Particular Metaphysical Knowledge

This article examines al-Rāzī’s views on the possibility of metaphysical knowledge. Firstly, after outlining his classification of the metaphysical knowable into essence and existence as well as undetailed (ijmālī) and detailed (taf~īlī), the article analyzes al-Rāzī’s acceptance of the possibility...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eşref Altaş
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scientific Studies Association (ILEM) 2021-11-01
Series:Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nazariyat.org/content/5-sayilar/15-cilt-7-sayi-2/4-esref-altas-metafizik-bilgi/4_esref_altas_en.pdf
_version_ 1797923131935948800
author Eşref Altaş
author_facet Eşref Altaş
author_sort Eşref Altaş
collection DOAJ
description This article examines al-Rāzī’s views on the possibility of metaphysical knowledge. Firstly, after outlining his classification of the metaphysical knowable into essence and existence as well as undetailed (ijmālī) and detailed (taf~īlī), the article analyzes al-Rāzī’s acceptance of the possibility of general knowledge of metaphysics under a few headings by delving into some major themes. These include the claims that the category of existence is broader than the world of the sensible, that theoretical reasoning leads to metaphysical knowledge, and lastly that the theoretical evidence provides necessary knowledge about the existence of a creator. Al-Rāzī has also been demonstrated in al-Matālib to have inherited the arguments rejecting metaphysical knowledge, which he had attributed in his earlier works to a group with the name muhandisiyyūn, by restricting them to the issue of God’s essence being knowable. For al-Rāzī, theoretical reasoning could provide knowledge about the existence of a particular metaphysical being but not about its quiddity. The article further underlines the metaphysical and epistemic theses for the position on the unknowability of God’s essence and discusses its semantic interpretation. The debate on the potential of theoretical reason to provide uncertain knowledge of detailed metaphysics in the form of the best possible explanations (the metaphysics of the best explanation, or al-awlawiyya), however, is left to another article.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T14:42:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fa67d9546e664ce8a362f41c761cd701
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2547-9415
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T14:42:06Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Scientific Studies Association (ILEM)
record_format Article
series Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences
spelling doaj.art-fa67d9546e664ce8a362f41c761cd7012023-02-15T16:08:08ZengScientific Studies Association (ILEM)Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences2547-94152021-11-017212115510.12658/Nazariyat.7.2.M0156enThe Power and Limits of Reason: Al-Rāzī on the Possibility of General and Particular Metaphysical KnowledgeEşref Altaş0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9758-510Xİstanbul Medeniyet UniversityThis article examines al-Rāzī’s views on the possibility of metaphysical knowledge. Firstly, after outlining his classification of the metaphysical knowable into essence and existence as well as undetailed (ijmālī) and detailed (taf~īlī), the article analyzes al-Rāzī’s acceptance of the possibility of general knowledge of metaphysics under a few headings by delving into some major themes. These include the claims that the category of existence is broader than the world of the sensible, that theoretical reasoning leads to metaphysical knowledge, and lastly that the theoretical evidence provides necessary knowledge about the existence of a creator. Al-Rāzī has also been demonstrated in al-Matālib to have inherited the arguments rejecting metaphysical knowledge, which he had attributed in his earlier works to a group with the name muhandisiyyūn, by restricting them to the issue of God’s essence being knowable. For al-Rāzī, theoretical reasoning could provide knowledge about the existence of a particular metaphysical being but not about its quiddity. The article further underlines the metaphysical and epistemic theses for the position on the unknowability of God’s essence and discusses its semantic interpretation. The debate on the potential of theoretical reason to provide uncertain knowledge of detailed metaphysics in the form of the best possible explanations (the metaphysics of the best explanation, or al-awlawiyya), however, is left to another article.https://nazariyat.org/content/5-sayilar/15-cilt-7-sayi-2/4-esref-altas-metafizik-bilgi/4_esref_altas_en.pdffakhr al-dīn al-rāzīmetaphysicsnegative theologygod’s essencegod’s existencegeneral metaphysics
spellingShingle Eşref Altaş
The Power and Limits of Reason: Al-Rāzī on the Possibility of General and Particular Metaphysical Knowledge
Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences
fakhr al-dīn al-rāzī
metaphysics
negative theology
god’s essence
god’s existence
general metaphysics
title The Power and Limits of Reason: Al-Rāzī on the Possibility of General and Particular Metaphysical Knowledge
title_full The Power and Limits of Reason: Al-Rāzī on the Possibility of General and Particular Metaphysical Knowledge
title_fullStr The Power and Limits of Reason: Al-Rāzī on the Possibility of General and Particular Metaphysical Knowledge
title_full_unstemmed The Power and Limits of Reason: Al-Rāzī on the Possibility of General and Particular Metaphysical Knowledge
title_short The Power and Limits of Reason: Al-Rāzī on the Possibility of General and Particular Metaphysical Knowledge
title_sort power and limits of reason al razi on the possibility of general and particular metaphysical knowledge
topic fakhr al-dīn al-rāzī
metaphysics
negative theology
god’s essence
god’s existence
general metaphysics
url https://nazariyat.org/content/5-sayilar/15-cilt-7-sayi-2/4-esref-altas-metafizik-bilgi/4_esref_altas_en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT esrefaltas thepowerandlimitsofreasonalrazionthepossibilityofgeneralandparticularmetaphysicalknowledge
AT esrefaltas powerandlimitsofreasonalrazionthepossibilityofgeneralandparticularmetaphysicalknowledge