Improving physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in COPD: perspectives of people with COPD and experts via a Delphi approach
Background Little is known about how to achieve enduring improvements in physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB) and sleep for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to: (1) identify what people with COPD from South Australia and the Netherlands, and expe...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018-04-01
|
Series: | PeerJ |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://peerj.com/articles/4604.pdf |
_version_ | 1797419887614754816 |
---|---|
author | Hayley Lewthwaite Tanja W. Effing Anke Lenferink Tim Olds Marie T. Williams |
author_facet | Hayley Lewthwaite Tanja W. Effing Anke Lenferink Tim Olds Marie T. Williams |
author_sort | Hayley Lewthwaite |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background Little is known about how to achieve enduring improvements in physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB) and sleep for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to: (1) identify what people with COPD from South Australia and the Netherlands, and experts from COPD- and non-COPD-specific backgrounds considered important to improve behaviours; and (2) identify areas of dissonance between these different participant groups. Methods A four-round Delphi study was conducted, analysed separately for each group. Free-text responses (Round 1) were collated into items within themes and rated for importance on a 9-point Likert scale (Rounds 2–3). Items meeting a priori criteria from each group were retained for rating by all groups in Round 4. Items and themes achieving a median Likert score of ≥7 and an interquartile range of ≤2 across all groups at Round 4 were judged important. Analysis of variance with Tukey’s post-hoc tested for statistical differences between groups for importance ratings. Results Seventy-three participants consented to participate in this study, of which 62 (85%) completed Round 4. In Round 4, 81 items (PA n = 54; SB n = 24; sleep n = 3) and 18 themes (PA n = 9; SB n = 7; sleep n = 2) were considered important across all groups concerning: (1) symptom/disease management, (2) targeting behavioural factors, and (3) less commonly, adapting the social/physical environments. There were few areas of dissonance between groups. Conclusion Our Delphi participants considered a multifactorial approach to be important to improve PA, SB and sleep. Recognising and addressing factors considered important to recipients and providers of health care may provide a basis for developing behaviour-specific interventions leading to long-term behaviour change in people with COPD. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T06:54:42Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-fa6fef67b4bc4f4a99dc9537b5caf09d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2167-8359 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T06:54:42Z |
publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | Article |
series | PeerJ |
spelling | doaj.art-fa6fef67b4bc4f4a99dc9537b5caf09d2023-12-03T10:14:00ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592018-04-016e460410.7717/peerj.4604Improving physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in COPD: perspectives of people with COPD and experts via a Delphi approachHayley Lewthwaite0Tanja W. Effing1Anke Lenferink2Tim Olds3Marie T. Williams4Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaCollege of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, NetherlandsAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaBackground Little is known about how to achieve enduring improvements in physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB) and sleep for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to: (1) identify what people with COPD from South Australia and the Netherlands, and experts from COPD- and non-COPD-specific backgrounds considered important to improve behaviours; and (2) identify areas of dissonance between these different participant groups. Methods A four-round Delphi study was conducted, analysed separately for each group. Free-text responses (Round 1) were collated into items within themes and rated for importance on a 9-point Likert scale (Rounds 2–3). Items meeting a priori criteria from each group were retained for rating by all groups in Round 4. Items and themes achieving a median Likert score of ≥7 and an interquartile range of ≤2 across all groups at Round 4 were judged important. Analysis of variance with Tukey’s post-hoc tested for statistical differences between groups for importance ratings. Results Seventy-three participants consented to participate in this study, of which 62 (85%) completed Round 4. In Round 4, 81 items (PA n = 54; SB n = 24; sleep n = 3) and 18 themes (PA n = 9; SB n = 7; sleep n = 2) were considered important across all groups concerning: (1) symptom/disease management, (2) targeting behavioural factors, and (3) less commonly, adapting the social/physical environments. There were few areas of dissonance between groups. Conclusion Our Delphi participants considered a multifactorial approach to be important to improve PA, SB and sleep. Recognising and addressing factors considered important to recipients and providers of health care may provide a basis for developing behaviour-specific interventions leading to long-term behaviour change in people with COPD.https://peerj.com/articles/4604.pdfChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseHealth behaviourHabitual behavioursDisease managementPatient preferenceBehaviour change |
spellingShingle | Hayley Lewthwaite Tanja W. Effing Anke Lenferink Tim Olds Marie T. Williams Improving physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in COPD: perspectives of people with COPD and experts via a Delphi approach PeerJ Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Health behaviour Habitual behaviours Disease management Patient preference Behaviour change |
title | Improving physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in COPD: perspectives of people with COPD and experts via a Delphi approach |
title_full | Improving physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in COPD: perspectives of people with COPD and experts via a Delphi approach |
title_fullStr | Improving physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in COPD: perspectives of people with COPD and experts via a Delphi approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in COPD: perspectives of people with COPD and experts via a Delphi approach |
title_short | Improving physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in COPD: perspectives of people with COPD and experts via a Delphi approach |
title_sort | improving physical activity sedentary behaviour and sleep in copd perspectives of people with copd and experts via a delphi approach |
topic | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Health behaviour Habitual behaviours Disease management Patient preference Behaviour change |
url | https://peerj.com/articles/4604.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hayleylewthwaite improvingphysicalactivitysedentarybehaviourandsleepincopdperspectivesofpeoplewithcopdandexpertsviaadelphiapproach AT tanjaweffing improvingphysicalactivitysedentarybehaviourandsleepincopdperspectivesofpeoplewithcopdandexpertsviaadelphiapproach AT ankelenferink improvingphysicalactivitysedentarybehaviourandsleepincopdperspectivesofpeoplewithcopdandexpertsviaadelphiapproach AT timolds improvingphysicalactivitysedentarybehaviourandsleepincopdperspectivesofpeoplewithcopdandexpertsviaadelphiapproach AT marietwilliams improvingphysicalactivitysedentarybehaviourandsleepincopdperspectivesofpeoplewithcopdandexpertsviaadelphiapproach |