Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity
Background Policy is an important element of influencing individual health-related behaviours associated to major risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as smoking, alcohol consumption, unhealthy eating and physical inactivity. However, our understanding of the specific measures rec...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2022-09-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4104_700dfe3d66cfdf693761228583843d7a.pdf |
_version_ | 1811158762251091968 |
---|---|
author | Peter Gelius Sven Messing Antonina Tcymbal Stephen Whiting João Breda Karim Abu-Omar |
author_facet | Peter Gelius Sven Messing Antonina Tcymbal Stephen Whiting João Breda Karim Abu-Omar |
author_sort | Peter Gelius |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background Policy is an important element of influencing individual health-related behaviours associated to major risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as smoking, alcohol consumption, unhealthy eating and physical inactivity. However, our understanding of the specific measures recommended in NCD prevention policy-making remains limited. This study analysed recent World Health Organization (WHO) documents to identify common policy instruments suggested for national NCD prevention policy and to assess similarities and differences between policies targeting different health-related behaviours. Methods Evert Vedung’s typology of policy instruments, which differentiates between regulatory, economic/fiscal and soft instruments, served as a basis for this analysis. A systematic search on WHO websites was conducted to identify documents relating to tobacco, alcohol, nutrition and physical activity. The staff of the respective units at the WHO Regional Office for Europe conducted an expert validation of these documents. The resulting documents were systematically searched for policy instruments. A word frequency analysis was conducted to estimate the use of individual instruments in the different policy fields, followed by an additional in-depth coding and content analysis by two independent reviewers. Results Across all health-related behaviours, the following policy instruments were suggested most frequently in WHO guidance documents: laws, regulations, standards, taxes, prices, campaigns, recommendations, partnerships and coordination. The analysis showed that regulatory and economic/fiscal policy instruments are mainly applied in tobacco and alcohol policy, while soft instruments dominate in the fields of nutrition and especially physical activity. Conclusion The study confirms perceived differences regarding recommended policy instruments in the different policy fields and supports arguments that “harder” instruments still appear to be underutilized in nutrition and physical activity. However, more comprehensive research is needed, especially with respect to actual instrument use and effectiveness in national- level NCD prevention policy. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T05:29:44Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-fa7df022066e46b6bd38b8bdbf3b62c8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2322-5939 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T05:29:44Z |
publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
publisher | Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
spelling | doaj.art-fa7df022066e46b6bd38b8bdbf3b62c82023-03-07T09:11:35ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392022-09-011191863187310.34172/ijhpm.2021.954104Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical ActivityPeter Gelius0Sven Messing1Antonina Tcymbal2Stephen Whiting3João Breda4Karim Abu-Omar5Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, GermanyWHO European Office for Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, RussiaWHO European Office for Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, RussiaDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, GermanyBackground Policy is an important element of influencing individual health-related behaviours associated to major risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as smoking, alcohol consumption, unhealthy eating and physical inactivity. However, our understanding of the specific measures recommended in NCD prevention policy-making remains limited. This study analysed recent World Health Organization (WHO) documents to identify common policy instruments suggested for national NCD prevention policy and to assess similarities and differences between policies targeting different health-related behaviours. Methods Evert Vedung’s typology of policy instruments, which differentiates between regulatory, economic/fiscal and soft instruments, served as a basis for this analysis. A systematic search on WHO websites was conducted to identify documents relating to tobacco, alcohol, nutrition and physical activity. The staff of the respective units at the WHO Regional Office for Europe conducted an expert validation of these documents. The resulting documents were systematically searched for policy instruments. A word frequency analysis was conducted to estimate the use of individual instruments in the different policy fields, followed by an additional in-depth coding and content analysis by two independent reviewers. Results Across all health-related behaviours, the following policy instruments were suggested most frequently in WHO guidance documents: laws, regulations, standards, taxes, prices, campaigns, recommendations, partnerships and coordination. The analysis showed that regulatory and economic/fiscal policy instruments are mainly applied in tobacco and alcohol policy, while soft instruments dominate in the fields of nutrition and especially physical activity. Conclusion The study confirms perceived differences regarding recommended policy instruments in the different policy fields and supports arguments that “harder” instruments still appear to be underutilized in nutrition and physical activity. However, more comprehensive research is needed, especially with respect to actual instrument use and effectiveness in national- level NCD prevention policy.https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4104_700dfe3d66cfdf693761228583843d7a.pdfncdspolicy-makingpolicy documentswho european regioncomparative research |
spellingShingle | Peter Gelius Sven Messing Antonina Tcymbal Stephen Whiting João Breda Karim Abu-Omar Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity International Journal of Health Policy and Management ncds policy-making policy documents who european region comparative research |
title | Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity |
title_full | Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity |
title_fullStr | Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity |
title_full_unstemmed | Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity |
title_short | Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity |
title_sort | policy instruments for health promotion a comparison of who policy guidance for tobacco alcohol nutrition and physical activity |
topic | ncds policy-making policy documents who european region comparative research |
url | https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4104_700dfe3d66cfdf693761228583843d7a.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petergelius policyinstrumentsforhealthpromotionacomparisonofwhopolicyguidancefortobaccoalcoholnutritionandphysicalactivity AT svenmessing policyinstrumentsforhealthpromotionacomparisonofwhopolicyguidancefortobaccoalcoholnutritionandphysicalactivity AT antoninatcymbal policyinstrumentsforhealthpromotionacomparisonofwhopolicyguidancefortobaccoalcoholnutritionandphysicalactivity AT stephenwhiting policyinstrumentsforhealthpromotionacomparisonofwhopolicyguidancefortobaccoalcoholnutritionandphysicalactivity AT joaobreda policyinstrumentsforhealthpromotionacomparisonofwhopolicyguidancefortobaccoalcoholnutritionandphysicalactivity AT karimabuomar policyinstrumentsforhealthpromotionacomparisonofwhopolicyguidancefortobaccoalcoholnutritionandphysicalactivity |