Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity

Background  Policy is an important element of influencing individual health-related behaviours associated to major risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as smoking, alcohol consumption, unhealthy eating and physical inactivity. However, our understanding of the specific measures rec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Gelius, Sven Messing, Antonina Tcymbal, Stephen Whiting, João Breda, Karim Abu-Omar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2022-09-01
Series:International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4104_700dfe3d66cfdf693761228583843d7a.pdf
_version_ 1811158762251091968
author Peter Gelius
Sven Messing
Antonina Tcymbal
Stephen Whiting
João Breda
Karim Abu-Omar
author_facet Peter Gelius
Sven Messing
Antonina Tcymbal
Stephen Whiting
João Breda
Karim Abu-Omar
author_sort Peter Gelius
collection DOAJ
description Background  Policy is an important element of influencing individual health-related behaviours associated to major risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as smoking, alcohol consumption, unhealthy eating and physical inactivity. However, our understanding of the specific measures recommended in NCD prevention policy-making remains limited. This study analysed recent World Health Organization (WHO) documents to identify common policy instruments suggested for national NCD prevention policy and to assess similarities and differences between policies targeting different health-related behaviours. Methods  Evert Vedung’s typology of policy instruments, which differentiates between regulatory, economic/fiscal and soft instruments, served as a basis for this analysis. A systematic search on WHO websites was conducted to identify documents relating to tobacco, alcohol, nutrition and physical activity. The staff of the respective units at the WHO Regional Office for Europe conducted an expert validation of these documents. The resulting documents were systematically searched for policy instruments. A word frequency analysis was conducted to estimate the use of individual instruments in the different policy fields, followed by an additional in-depth coding and content analysis by two independent reviewers. Results  Across all health-related behaviours, the following policy instruments were suggested most frequently in WHO guidance documents: laws, regulations, standards, taxes, prices, campaigns, recommendations, partnerships and coordination. The analysis showed that regulatory and economic/fiscal policy instruments are mainly applied in tobacco and alcohol policy, while soft instruments dominate in the fields of nutrition and especially physical activity. Conclusion  The study confirms perceived differences regarding recommended policy instruments in the different policy fields and supports arguments that “harder” instruments still appear to be underutilized in nutrition and physical activity. However, more comprehensive research is needed, especially with respect to actual instrument use and effectiveness in national- level NCD prevention policy.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:29:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fa7df022066e46b6bd38b8bdbf3b62c8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2322-5939
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:29:44Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series International Journal of Health Policy and Management
spelling doaj.art-fa7df022066e46b6bd38b8bdbf3b62c82023-03-07T09:11:35ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392022-09-011191863187310.34172/ijhpm.2021.954104Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical ActivityPeter Gelius0Sven Messing1Antonina Tcymbal2Stephen Whiting3João Breda4Karim Abu-Omar5Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, GermanyWHO European Office for Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, RussiaWHO European Office for Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, RussiaDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, GermanyBackground  Policy is an important element of influencing individual health-related behaviours associated to major risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as smoking, alcohol consumption, unhealthy eating and physical inactivity. However, our understanding of the specific measures recommended in NCD prevention policy-making remains limited. This study analysed recent World Health Organization (WHO) documents to identify common policy instruments suggested for national NCD prevention policy and to assess similarities and differences between policies targeting different health-related behaviours. Methods  Evert Vedung’s typology of policy instruments, which differentiates between regulatory, economic/fiscal and soft instruments, served as a basis for this analysis. A systematic search on WHO websites was conducted to identify documents relating to tobacco, alcohol, nutrition and physical activity. The staff of the respective units at the WHO Regional Office for Europe conducted an expert validation of these documents. The resulting documents were systematically searched for policy instruments. A word frequency analysis was conducted to estimate the use of individual instruments in the different policy fields, followed by an additional in-depth coding and content analysis by two independent reviewers. Results  Across all health-related behaviours, the following policy instruments were suggested most frequently in WHO guidance documents: laws, regulations, standards, taxes, prices, campaigns, recommendations, partnerships and coordination. The analysis showed that regulatory and economic/fiscal policy instruments are mainly applied in tobacco and alcohol policy, while soft instruments dominate in the fields of nutrition and especially physical activity. Conclusion  The study confirms perceived differences regarding recommended policy instruments in the different policy fields and supports arguments that “harder” instruments still appear to be underutilized in nutrition and physical activity. However, more comprehensive research is needed, especially with respect to actual instrument use and effectiveness in national- level NCD prevention policy.https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4104_700dfe3d66cfdf693761228583843d7a.pdfncdspolicy-makingpolicy documentswho european regioncomparative research
spellingShingle Peter Gelius
Sven Messing
Antonina Tcymbal
Stephen Whiting
João Breda
Karim Abu-Omar
Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
ncds
policy-making
policy documents
who european region
comparative research
title Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity
title_full Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity
title_fullStr Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity
title_full_unstemmed Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity
title_short Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity
title_sort policy instruments for health promotion a comparison of who policy guidance for tobacco alcohol nutrition and physical activity
topic ncds
policy-making
policy documents
who european region
comparative research
url https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4104_700dfe3d66cfdf693761228583843d7a.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT petergelius policyinstrumentsforhealthpromotionacomparisonofwhopolicyguidancefortobaccoalcoholnutritionandphysicalactivity
AT svenmessing policyinstrumentsforhealthpromotionacomparisonofwhopolicyguidancefortobaccoalcoholnutritionandphysicalactivity
AT antoninatcymbal policyinstrumentsforhealthpromotionacomparisonofwhopolicyguidancefortobaccoalcoholnutritionandphysicalactivity
AT stephenwhiting policyinstrumentsforhealthpromotionacomparisonofwhopolicyguidancefortobaccoalcoholnutritionandphysicalactivity
AT joaobreda policyinstrumentsforhealthpromotionacomparisonofwhopolicyguidancefortobaccoalcoholnutritionandphysicalactivity
AT karimabuomar policyinstrumentsforhealthpromotionacomparisonofwhopolicyguidancefortobaccoalcoholnutritionandphysicalactivity