Unipolar versus Bipolar Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Elderly Patients with Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures

Purpose. To compare outcomes of unipolar versus bipolar uncemented hemiarthroplasty and determine factors affecting outcomes. Methods. 433 and 274 elderly patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures underwent uncemented unipolar hemiarthroplasty and uncemented bipolar hydroxyapatite...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bhushan M Sabnis, Ivan J Brenkel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-04-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900103
_version_ 1818510063041511424
author Bhushan M Sabnis
Ivan J Brenkel
author_facet Bhushan M Sabnis
Ivan J Brenkel
author_sort Bhushan M Sabnis
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare outcomes of unipolar versus bipolar uncemented hemiarthroplasty and determine factors affecting outcomes. Methods. 433 and 274 elderly patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures underwent uncemented unipolar hemiarthroplasty and uncemented bipolar hydroxyapatite-coated hemiarthroplasty, respectively. Surgical options were based on the patient's general condition and preinjury mobility status. In the respective groups, the mortality of 377 and 242 patients and the mobility of 270 and 217 patients were reviewed at the 4-month follow-up. Patient age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score, mobility, and mortality of the 2 groups were compared. Results. Patients who underwent unipolar hemiarthroplasty were significantly older, less fit, and less mobile (p<0.001). Patients who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty achieved better outcomes for mortality and mobility (p<0.001). Among patients who were able to walk unaided before injury, more of those having bipolar hemiarthroplasty were able to do so at month 4 than those having unipolar hemiarthroplasty (13% vs. 33%, p<0.001). Mortality within 4 months was associated with age, male gender, and ASA score. When patients were stratified according to age groups, mortality within 4 months was lower in patients having bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Conclusion. In elderly patients with femoral neck fractures who were fit and physiologically young, uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty seemed to achieve better functional outcome.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T22:54:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fa8373f9776b432f9449f882a99b3a1d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2309-4990
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T22:54:04Z
publishDate 2011-04-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-fa8373f9776b432f9449f882a99b3a1d2022-12-22T01:30:20ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902011-04-011910.1177/230949901101900103Unipolar versus Bipolar Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Elderly Patients with Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck FracturesBhushan M SabnisIvan J BrenkelPurpose. To compare outcomes of unipolar versus bipolar uncemented hemiarthroplasty and determine factors affecting outcomes. Methods. 433 and 274 elderly patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures underwent uncemented unipolar hemiarthroplasty and uncemented bipolar hydroxyapatite-coated hemiarthroplasty, respectively. Surgical options were based on the patient's general condition and preinjury mobility status. In the respective groups, the mortality of 377 and 242 patients and the mobility of 270 and 217 patients were reviewed at the 4-month follow-up. Patient age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score, mobility, and mortality of the 2 groups were compared. Results. Patients who underwent unipolar hemiarthroplasty were significantly older, less fit, and less mobile (p<0.001). Patients who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty achieved better outcomes for mortality and mobility (p<0.001). Among patients who were able to walk unaided before injury, more of those having bipolar hemiarthroplasty were able to do so at month 4 than those having unipolar hemiarthroplasty (13% vs. 33%, p<0.001). Mortality within 4 months was associated with age, male gender, and ASA score. When patients were stratified according to age groups, mortality within 4 months was lower in patients having bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Conclusion. In elderly patients with femoral neck fractures who were fit and physiologically young, uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty seemed to achieve better functional outcome.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900103
spellingShingle Bhushan M Sabnis
Ivan J Brenkel
Unipolar versus Bipolar Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Elderly Patients with Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
title Unipolar versus Bipolar Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Elderly Patients with Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures
title_full Unipolar versus Bipolar Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Elderly Patients with Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures
title_fullStr Unipolar versus Bipolar Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Elderly Patients with Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Unipolar versus Bipolar Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Elderly Patients with Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures
title_short Unipolar versus Bipolar Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Elderly Patients with Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures
title_sort unipolar versus bipolar uncemented hemiarthroplasty for elderly patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900103
work_keys_str_mv AT bhushanmsabnis unipolarversusbipolaruncementedhemiarthroplastyforelderlypatientswithdisplacedintracapsularfemoralneckfractures
AT ivanjbrenkel unipolarversusbipolaruncementedhemiarthroplastyforelderlypatientswithdisplacedintracapsularfemoralneckfractures