Patient safety in Dutch primary care: a study protocol

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Insight into the frequency and seriousness of potentially unsafe situations may be the first step towards improving patient safety. Most patient safety attention has been paid to patient safety in hospitals. However, in many countrie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mettes Theodorus, Martijn Lucie, Jacobs Annelies, Giesen Paul, de Feijter Eimert, van Dulmen Simone, Gaal Sander, Harmsen Mirjam, Verstappen Wim, Nijhuis-van der Sanden Ria, Wensing Michel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-06-01
Series:Implementation Science
Online Access:http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/50
_version_ 1819121588034863104
author Mettes Theodorus
Martijn Lucie
Jacobs Annelies
Giesen Paul
de Feijter Eimert
van Dulmen Simone
Gaal Sander
Harmsen Mirjam
Verstappen Wim
Nijhuis-van der Sanden Ria
Wensing Michel
author_facet Mettes Theodorus
Martijn Lucie
Jacobs Annelies
Giesen Paul
de Feijter Eimert
van Dulmen Simone
Gaal Sander
Harmsen Mirjam
Verstappen Wim
Nijhuis-van der Sanden Ria
Wensing Michel
author_sort Mettes Theodorus
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Insight into the frequency and seriousness of potentially unsafe situations may be the first step towards improving patient safety. Most patient safety attention has been paid to patient safety in hospitals. However, in many countries, patients receive most of their healthcare in primary care settings. There is little concrete information about patient safety in primary care in the Netherlands. The overall aim of this study was to provide insight into the current patient safety issues in Dutch general practices, out-of-hours primary care centres, general dental practices, midwifery practices, and allied healthcare practices. The objectives of this study are: to determine the frequency, type, impact, and causes of incidents found in the records of primary care patients; to determine the type, impact, and causes of incidents reported by Dutch healthcare professionals; and to provide insight into patient safety management in primary care practices.</p> <p>Design and methods</p> <p>The study consists of three parts: a retrospective patient record study of 1,000 records per practice type was conducted to determine the frequency, type, impact, and causes of incidents found in the records of primary care patients (objective one); a prospective component concerns an incident-reporting study in each of the participating practices, during two successive weeks, to determine the type, impact, and causes of incidents reported by Dutch healthcare professionals (objective two); to provide insight into patient safety management in Dutch primary care practices (objective three), we surveyed organizational and cultural items relating to patient safety. We analysed the incidents found in the retrospective patient record study and the prospective incident-reporting study by type of incident, causes (Eindhoven Classification Model), actual harm (severity-of-outcome domain of the International Taxonomy of Medical Errors in Primary Care), and probability of severe harm or death.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>To estimate the frequency of incidents was difficult. Much depended on the accuracy of the patient records and the professionals' consensus about which types of adverse events have to be recognized as incidents.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-22T06:38:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fa83d12df69b44868ac483186a9b440f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-5908
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T06:38:56Z
publishDate 2010-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Implementation Science
spelling doaj.art-fa83d12df69b44868ac483186a9b440f2022-12-21T18:35:30ZengBMCImplementation Science1748-59082010-06-01515010.1186/1748-5908-5-50Patient safety in Dutch primary care: a study protocolMettes TheodorusMartijn LucieJacobs AnneliesGiesen Paulde Feijter Eimertvan Dulmen SimoneGaal SanderHarmsen MirjamVerstappen WimNijhuis-van der Sanden RiaWensing Michel<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Insight into the frequency and seriousness of potentially unsafe situations may be the first step towards improving patient safety. Most patient safety attention has been paid to patient safety in hospitals. However, in many countries, patients receive most of their healthcare in primary care settings. There is little concrete information about patient safety in primary care in the Netherlands. The overall aim of this study was to provide insight into the current patient safety issues in Dutch general practices, out-of-hours primary care centres, general dental practices, midwifery practices, and allied healthcare practices. The objectives of this study are: to determine the frequency, type, impact, and causes of incidents found in the records of primary care patients; to determine the type, impact, and causes of incidents reported by Dutch healthcare professionals; and to provide insight into patient safety management in primary care practices.</p> <p>Design and methods</p> <p>The study consists of three parts: a retrospective patient record study of 1,000 records per practice type was conducted to determine the frequency, type, impact, and causes of incidents found in the records of primary care patients (objective one); a prospective component concerns an incident-reporting study in each of the participating practices, during two successive weeks, to determine the type, impact, and causes of incidents reported by Dutch healthcare professionals (objective two); to provide insight into patient safety management in Dutch primary care practices (objective three), we surveyed organizational and cultural items relating to patient safety. We analysed the incidents found in the retrospective patient record study and the prospective incident-reporting study by type of incident, causes (Eindhoven Classification Model), actual harm (severity-of-outcome domain of the International Taxonomy of Medical Errors in Primary Care), and probability of severe harm or death.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>To estimate the frequency of incidents was difficult. Much depended on the accuracy of the patient records and the professionals' consensus about which types of adverse events have to be recognized as incidents.</p>http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/50
spellingShingle Mettes Theodorus
Martijn Lucie
Jacobs Annelies
Giesen Paul
de Feijter Eimert
van Dulmen Simone
Gaal Sander
Harmsen Mirjam
Verstappen Wim
Nijhuis-van der Sanden Ria
Wensing Michel
Patient safety in Dutch primary care: a study protocol
Implementation Science
title Patient safety in Dutch primary care: a study protocol
title_full Patient safety in Dutch primary care: a study protocol
title_fullStr Patient safety in Dutch primary care: a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Patient safety in Dutch primary care: a study protocol
title_short Patient safety in Dutch primary care: a study protocol
title_sort patient safety in dutch primary care a study protocol
url http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/50
work_keys_str_mv AT mettestheodorus patientsafetyindutchprimarycareastudyprotocol
AT martijnlucie patientsafetyindutchprimarycareastudyprotocol
AT jacobsannelies patientsafetyindutchprimarycareastudyprotocol
AT giesenpaul patientsafetyindutchprimarycareastudyprotocol
AT defeijtereimert patientsafetyindutchprimarycareastudyprotocol
AT vandulmensimone patientsafetyindutchprimarycareastudyprotocol
AT gaalsander patientsafetyindutchprimarycareastudyprotocol
AT harmsenmirjam patientsafetyindutchprimarycareastudyprotocol
AT verstappenwim patientsafetyindutchprimarycareastudyprotocol
AT nijhuisvandersandenria patientsafetyindutchprimarycareastudyprotocol
AT wensingmichel patientsafetyindutchprimarycareastudyprotocol