Burned Area Classification Based on Extreme Learning Machine and Sentinel-2 Images

Sentinel-2 satellite images allow high separability for mapping burned and unburned areas. This problem has been extensively addressed using machine-learning algorithms. However, these need a suitable dataset and entail considerable training time. Recently, extreme learning machines (ELM) have prese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Gajardo, Marco Mora, Guillermo Valdés-Nicolao, Marcos Carrasco-Benavides
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/1/9
_version_ 1797499742707515392
author John Gajardo
Marco Mora
Guillermo Valdés-Nicolao
Marcos Carrasco-Benavides
author_facet John Gajardo
Marco Mora
Guillermo Valdés-Nicolao
Marcos Carrasco-Benavides
author_sort John Gajardo
collection DOAJ
description Sentinel-2 satellite images allow high separability for mapping burned and unburned areas. This problem has been extensively addressed using machine-learning algorithms. However, these need a suitable dataset and entail considerable training time. Recently, extreme learning machines (ELM) have presented high precision in classification and regression problems but with low computational cost. This paper proposes evaluating ELM to map burned areas and compare them with other machine-learning algorithms broadly used. Several indices, metrics and training times were used to assess the performance of the algorithms. Considering the average of datasets, the best performance was obtained by random forest (DICE = 0.93; omission and commission = 0.08) and ELM (DICE = 0.90; omission and commission = 0.07). The training time for the best model was from ELM (1.45 s) and logistic regression (1.85 s). According to results, ELM was the best burned-area classification algorithm, considering precision and training time, evidencing great potential to map burned areas at global scales with medium-high spatial resolution images. This information is essential to fire-risk systems and burned-area records used to design prevention and fire-combat strategies, and it provides valuable knowledge on the effect of fires on the landscape and atmosphere.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:51:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fa8671cca4424853a5a04123dfdbfe07
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:51:47Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-fa8671cca4424853a5a04123dfdbfe072023-11-23T11:06:15ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-12-01121910.3390/app12010009Burned Area Classification Based on Extreme Learning Machine and Sentinel-2 ImagesJohn Gajardo0Marco Mora1Guillermo Valdés-Nicolao2Marcos Carrasco-Benavides3Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, ChileLaboratorio de Investigaciones Tecnológicas en Reconocimiento de Patrones, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3480112, ChileLaboratorio de Investigaciones Tecnológicas en Reconocimiento de Patrones, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3480112, ChileDepartamento de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Católica del Maule, Curico 3340000, ChileSentinel-2 satellite images allow high separability for mapping burned and unburned areas. This problem has been extensively addressed using machine-learning algorithms. However, these need a suitable dataset and entail considerable training time. Recently, extreme learning machines (ELM) have presented high precision in classification and regression problems but with low computational cost. This paper proposes evaluating ELM to map burned areas and compare them with other machine-learning algorithms broadly used. Several indices, metrics and training times were used to assess the performance of the algorithms. Considering the average of datasets, the best performance was obtained by random forest (DICE = 0.93; omission and commission = 0.08) and ELM (DICE = 0.90; omission and commission = 0.07). The training time for the best model was from ELM (1.45 s) and logistic regression (1.85 s). According to results, ELM was the best burned-area classification algorithm, considering precision and training time, evidencing great potential to map burned areas at global scales with medium-high spatial resolution images. This information is essential to fire-risk systems and burned-area records used to design prevention and fire-combat strategies, and it provides valuable knowledge on the effect of fires on the landscape and atmosphere.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/1/9remote sensingburned area classificationextreme learning machinesentinel-2 images
spellingShingle John Gajardo
Marco Mora
Guillermo Valdés-Nicolao
Marcos Carrasco-Benavides
Burned Area Classification Based on Extreme Learning Machine and Sentinel-2 Images
Applied Sciences
remote sensing
burned area classification
extreme learning machine
sentinel-2 images
title Burned Area Classification Based on Extreme Learning Machine and Sentinel-2 Images
title_full Burned Area Classification Based on Extreme Learning Machine and Sentinel-2 Images
title_fullStr Burned Area Classification Based on Extreme Learning Machine and Sentinel-2 Images
title_full_unstemmed Burned Area Classification Based on Extreme Learning Machine and Sentinel-2 Images
title_short Burned Area Classification Based on Extreme Learning Machine and Sentinel-2 Images
title_sort burned area classification based on extreme learning machine and sentinel 2 images
topic remote sensing
burned area classification
extreme learning machine
sentinel-2 images
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/1/9
work_keys_str_mv AT johngajardo burnedareaclassificationbasedonextremelearningmachineandsentinel2images
AT marcomora burnedareaclassificationbasedonextremelearningmachineandsentinel2images
AT guillermovaldesnicolao burnedareaclassificationbasedonextremelearningmachineandsentinel2images
AT marcoscarrascobenavides burnedareaclassificationbasedonextremelearningmachineandsentinel2images