Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods

Background and Objectives: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is the most common chronic metabolic disease, with many complications including renal failure, blindness and non-traumatic amputation, so it is important to monitor and regulate blood glucose. Considering how easy home blood glucose monitoring is, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rasouli R, Mahdavi R., Ostad Rahimi A.R.
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Qom University of Medical Sciences 2012-01-01
Series:Majallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Qum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.muq.ac.ir/library/upload/article/af_2392494443924252922964286995342234433225_jmsWMjf6RYJcQ.pdf
_version_ 1818486385807458304
author Rasouli R
Mahdavi R.
Ostad Rahimi A.R.
author_facet Rasouli R
Mahdavi R.
Ostad Rahimi A.R.
author_sort Rasouli R
collection DOAJ
description Background and Objectives: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is the most common chronic metabolic disease, with many complications including renal failure, blindness and non-traumatic amputation, so it is important to monitor and regulate blood glucose. Considering how easy home blood glucose monitoring is, we decided to evaluate the performance of two available glucometers for detection of blood glucose compared with standard laboratory methods.Methods: In this analytical study, we compared the capillary blood glucose levels of 60 volunteers with mean age of 32.8±9.6 years in Tabriz Mehr Laboratory as determined by test strips (two different Glucometers) with venous blood glucose levels’ measurements by the enzymatic method (the standard laboratory kit). Data were analyzed using one way-ANOVA test, T-test, Pearson correlation and Bland and Altman plot.Results: The mean differences of No: 1 and No: 2 Glucometers with enzymatic laboratory method were 20.78±11.61 and 4.5±3.76mg/dl respectively. The one way ANOVA test indicated significant differences between three methods (p<0.05). Further Duncan's test revealed significant differences between two devices (p=0.001) and device No.1 and laboratory method (p=0.001); however, the differences between device No.2 and laboratory method were not statistically significant (p=0.83). Conclusion: According to the results, calibrating the devices with laboratory instruments in order to make major clinical decisions is recommended.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T16:22:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fa93a5b98d85434084e28b67f408349f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-7799
2008-1375
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-10T16:22:15Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Qom University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Majallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Qum
spelling doaj.art-fa93a5b98d85434084e28b67f408349f2022-12-22T01:41:47ZfasQom University of Medical SciencesMajallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Qum1735-77992008-13752012-01-01549095Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory MethodsRasouli RMahdavi R.Ostad Rahimi A.R.Background and Objectives: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is the most common chronic metabolic disease, with many complications including renal failure, blindness and non-traumatic amputation, so it is important to monitor and regulate blood glucose. Considering how easy home blood glucose monitoring is, we decided to evaluate the performance of two available glucometers for detection of blood glucose compared with standard laboratory methods.Methods: In this analytical study, we compared the capillary blood glucose levels of 60 volunteers with mean age of 32.8±9.6 years in Tabriz Mehr Laboratory as determined by test strips (two different Glucometers) with venous blood glucose levels’ measurements by the enzymatic method (the standard laboratory kit). Data were analyzed using one way-ANOVA test, T-test, Pearson correlation and Bland and Altman plot.Results: The mean differences of No: 1 and No: 2 Glucometers with enzymatic laboratory method were 20.78±11.61 and 4.5±3.76mg/dl respectively. The one way ANOVA test indicated significant differences between three methods (p<0.05). Further Duncan's test revealed significant differences between two devices (p=0.001) and device No.1 and laboratory method (p=0.001); however, the differences between device No.2 and laboratory method were not statistically significant (p=0.83). Conclusion: According to the results, calibrating the devices with laboratory instruments in order to make major clinical decisions is recommended.http://journal.muq.ac.ir/library/upload/article/af_2392494443924252922964286995342234433225_jmsWMjf6RYJcQ.pdfBlood GlucoseGlucometer DevicesDiabetes Mellitus.
spellingShingle Rasouli R
Mahdavi R.
Ostad Rahimi A.R.
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods
Majallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Qum
Blood Glucose
Glucometer Devices
Diabetes Mellitus.
title Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods
title_full Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods
title_short Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods
title_sort evaluation of the efficacy and correlation between blood glucose measured using glucometers and enzymatic laboratory methods
topic Blood Glucose
Glucometer Devices
Diabetes Mellitus.
url http://journal.muq.ac.ir/library/upload/article/af_2392494443924252922964286995342234433225_jmsWMjf6RYJcQ.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rasoulir evaluationoftheefficacyandcorrelationbetweenbloodglucosemeasuredusingglucometersandenzymaticlaboratorymethods
AT mahdavir evaluationoftheefficacyandcorrelationbetweenbloodglucosemeasuredusingglucometersandenzymaticlaboratorymethods
AT ostadrahimiar evaluationoftheefficacyandcorrelationbetweenbloodglucosemeasuredusingglucometersandenzymaticlaboratorymethods