What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents

Life-history traits are directly linked to fitness, and therefore, can be highly adaptive. Livebearers have been used as models for understanding the evolution of life histories due to their wide diversity in these traits. Several different selective pressures, including population density, predatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea J. Roth-Monzón, Mark C. Belk, J. Jaime Zúñiga-Vega, Jerald B. Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2020.608046/full
_version_ 1818591045466718208
author Andrea J. Roth-Monzón
Mark C. Belk
J. Jaime Zúñiga-Vega
Jerald B. Johnson
Jerald B. Johnson
author_facet Andrea J. Roth-Monzón
Mark C. Belk
J. Jaime Zúñiga-Vega
Jerald B. Johnson
Jerald B. Johnson
author_sort Andrea J. Roth-Monzón
collection DOAJ
description Life-history traits are directly linked to fitness, and therefore, can be highly adaptive. Livebearers have been used as models for understanding the evolution of life histories due to their wide diversity in these traits. Several different selective pressures, including population density, predation, and resource levels, can shape life-history traits. However, these selective pressures are usually considered independently in livebearers and we lack a clear understanding of how they interact in shaping life-history evolution. Furthermore, selective pressures such as interspecific competition are rarely considered as drivers of life-history evolution in poeciliids. Here we test the simultaneous effects of several potential selective pressures on life-history traits in the livebearing fish Poeciliopsis prolifica. We employ a multi-model inference approach. We focus on four known agents of selection: resource availability, stream velocity, population density, and interspecific competition, and their effect on four life-history traits: reproductive allocation, superfetation, number of embryos, and individual embryo size. We found that models with population density and interspecific competition alone were strongly supported in our data and, hence, indicated that these two factors are the most important selective agents for most life-history traits, except for embryo size. When population density and interspecific competition increase there is an increase in each of the three life-history traits (reproductive allocation, superfetation, and number of embryos). For individual embryo size, we found that all single-agent models were equivalent and it was unclear which selective agent best explained variation. We also found that models that included population density and interspecific competition as direct effects were better supported than those that included them as indirect effects through their influence on resource availability. Our study underscores the importance of interspecific competitive interactions on shaping life-history traits and suggests that these interactions should be considered in future life-history studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T10:06:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-face9c378174492b96d9a8ebc9563568
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-701X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T10:06:12Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-face9c378174492b96d9a8ebc95635682022-12-21T22:35:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution2296-701X2021-01-01810.3389/fevo.2020.608046608046What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective AgentsAndrea J. Roth-Monzón0Mark C. Belk1J. Jaime Zúñiga-Vega2Jerald B. Johnson3Jerald B. Johnson4Evolutionary Ecology Laboratories, Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United StatesEvolutionary Ecology Laboratories, Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United StatesDepartamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México, MexicoEvolutionary Ecology Laboratories, Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United StatesMonte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United StatesLife-history traits are directly linked to fitness, and therefore, can be highly adaptive. Livebearers have been used as models for understanding the evolution of life histories due to their wide diversity in these traits. Several different selective pressures, including population density, predation, and resource levels, can shape life-history traits. However, these selective pressures are usually considered independently in livebearers and we lack a clear understanding of how they interact in shaping life-history evolution. Furthermore, selective pressures such as interspecific competition are rarely considered as drivers of life-history evolution in poeciliids. Here we test the simultaneous effects of several potential selective pressures on life-history traits in the livebearing fish Poeciliopsis prolifica. We employ a multi-model inference approach. We focus on four known agents of selection: resource availability, stream velocity, population density, and interspecific competition, and their effect on four life-history traits: reproductive allocation, superfetation, number of embryos, and individual embryo size. We found that models with population density and interspecific competition alone were strongly supported in our data and, hence, indicated that these two factors are the most important selective agents for most life-history traits, except for embryo size. When population density and interspecific competition increase there is an increase in each of the three life-history traits (reproductive allocation, superfetation, and number of embryos). For individual embryo size, we found that all single-agent models were equivalent and it was unclear which selective agent best explained variation. We also found that models that included population density and interspecific competition as direct effects were better supported than those that included them as indirect effects through their influence on resource availability. Our study underscores the importance of interspecific competitive interactions on shaping life-history traits and suggests that these interactions should be considered in future life-history studies.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2020.608046/fullresource availabilityinterspecific competitiondensitylife historypoeciliidsstream velocity
spellingShingle Andrea J. Roth-Monzón
Mark C. Belk
J. Jaime Zúñiga-Vega
Jerald B. Johnson
Jerald B. Johnson
What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
resource availability
interspecific competition
density
life history
poeciliids
stream velocity
title What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents
title_full What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents
title_fullStr What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents
title_full_unstemmed What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents
title_short What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents
title_sort what drives life history variation in the livebearing fish poeciliopsis prolifica an assessment of multiple putative selective agents
topic resource availability
interspecific competition
density
life history
poeciliids
stream velocity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2020.608046/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andreajrothmonzon whatdriveslifehistoryvariationinthelivebearingfishpoeciliopsisprolificaanassessmentofmultipleputativeselectiveagents
AT markcbelk whatdriveslifehistoryvariationinthelivebearingfishpoeciliopsisprolificaanassessmentofmultipleputativeselectiveagents
AT jjaimezunigavega whatdriveslifehistoryvariationinthelivebearingfishpoeciliopsisprolificaanassessmentofmultipleputativeselectiveagents
AT jeraldbjohnson whatdriveslifehistoryvariationinthelivebearingfishpoeciliopsisprolificaanassessmentofmultipleputativeselectiveagents
AT jeraldbjohnson whatdriveslifehistoryvariationinthelivebearingfishpoeciliopsisprolificaanassessmentofmultipleputativeselectiveagents