What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents
Life-history traits are directly linked to fitness, and therefore, can be highly adaptive. Livebearers have been used as models for understanding the evolution of life histories due to their wide diversity in these traits. Several different selective pressures, including population density, predatio...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2020.608046/full |
_version_ | 1818591045466718208 |
---|---|
author | Andrea J. Roth-Monzón Mark C. Belk J. Jaime Zúñiga-Vega Jerald B. Johnson Jerald B. Johnson |
author_facet | Andrea J. Roth-Monzón Mark C. Belk J. Jaime Zúñiga-Vega Jerald B. Johnson Jerald B. Johnson |
author_sort | Andrea J. Roth-Monzón |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Life-history traits are directly linked to fitness, and therefore, can be highly adaptive. Livebearers have been used as models for understanding the evolution of life histories due to their wide diversity in these traits. Several different selective pressures, including population density, predation, and resource levels, can shape life-history traits. However, these selective pressures are usually considered independently in livebearers and we lack a clear understanding of how they interact in shaping life-history evolution. Furthermore, selective pressures such as interspecific competition are rarely considered as drivers of life-history evolution in poeciliids. Here we test the simultaneous effects of several potential selective pressures on life-history traits in the livebearing fish Poeciliopsis prolifica. We employ a multi-model inference approach. We focus on four known agents of selection: resource availability, stream velocity, population density, and interspecific competition, and their effect on four life-history traits: reproductive allocation, superfetation, number of embryos, and individual embryo size. We found that models with population density and interspecific competition alone were strongly supported in our data and, hence, indicated that these two factors are the most important selective agents for most life-history traits, except for embryo size. When population density and interspecific competition increase there is an increase in each of the three life-history traits (reproductive allocation, superfetation, and number of embryos). For individual embryo size, we found that all single-agent models were equivalent and it was unclear which selective agent best explained variation. We also found that models that included population density and interspecific competition as direct effects were better supported than those that included them as indirect effects through their influence on resource availability. Our study underscores the importance of interspecific competitive interactions on shaping life-history traits and suggests that these interactions should be considered in future life-history studies. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-16T10:06:12Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-face9c378174492b96d9a8ebc9563568 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2296-701X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-16T10:06:12Z |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution |
spelling | doaj.art-face9c378174492b96d9a8ebc95635682022-12-21T22:35:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution2296-701X2021-01-01810.3389/fevo.2020.608046608046What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective AgentsAndrea J. Roth-Monzón0Mark C. Belk1J. Jaime Zúñiga-Vega2Jerald B. Johnson3Jerald B. Johnson4Evolutionary Ecology Laboratories, Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United StatesEvolutionary Ecology Laboratories, Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United StatesDepartamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México, MexicoEvolutionary Ecology Laboratories, Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United StatesMonte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United StatesLife-history traits are directly linked to fitness, and therefore, can be highly adaptive. Livebearers have been used as models for understanding the evolution of life histories due to their wide diversity in these traits. Several different selective pressures, including population density, predation, and resource levels, can shape life-history traits. However, these selective pressures are usually considered independently in livebearers and we lack a clear understanding of how they interact in shaping life-history evolution. Furthermore, selective pressures such as interspecific competition are rarely considered as drivers of life-history evolution in poeciliids. Here we test the simultaneous effects of several potential selective pressures on life-history traits in the livebearing fish Poeciliopsis prolifica. We employ a multi-model inference approach. We focus on four known agents of selection: resource availability, stream velocity, population density, and interspecific competition, and their effect on four life-history traits: reproductive allocation, superfetation, number of embryos, and individual embryo size. We found that models with population density and interspecific competition alone were strongly supported in our data and, hence, indicated that these two factors are the most important selective agents for most life-history traits, except for embryo size. When population density and interspecific competition increase there is an increase in each of the three life-history traits (reproductive allocation, superfetation, and number of embryos). For individual embryo size, we found that all single-agent models were equivalent and it was unclear which selective agent best explained variation. We also found that models that included population density and interspecific competition as direct effects were better supported than those that included them as indirect effects through their influence on resource availability. Our study underscores the importance of interspecific competitive interactions on shaping life-history traits and suggests that these interactions should be considered in future life-history studies.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2020.608046/fullresource availabilityinterspecific competitiondensitylife historypoeciliidsstream velocity |
spellingShingle | Andrea J. Roth-Monzón Mark C. Belk J. Jaime Zúñiga-Vega Jerald B. Johnson Jerald B. Johnson What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution resource availability interspecific competition density life history poeciliids stream velocity |
title | What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents |
title_full | What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents |
title_fullStr | What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents |
title_full_unstemmed | What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents |
title_short | What Drives Life-History Variation in the Livebearing Fish Poeciliopsis prolifica? An Assessment of Multiple Putative Selective Agents |
title_sort | what drives life history variation in the livebearing fish poeciliopsis prolifica an assessment of multiple putative selective agents |
topic | resource availability interspecific competition density life history poeciliids stream velocity |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2020.608046/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andreajrothmonzon whatdriveslifehistoryvariationinthelivebearingfishpoeciliopsisprolificaanassessmentofmultipleputativeselectiveagents AT markcbelk whatdriveslifehistoryvariationinthelivebearingfishpoeciliopsisprolificaanassessmentofmultipleputativeselectiveagents AT jjaimezunigavega whatdriveslifehistoryvariationinthelivebearingfishpoeciliopsisprolificaanassessmentofmultipleputativeselectiveagents AT jeraldbjohnson whatdriveslifehistoryvariationinthelivebearingfishpoeciliopsisprolificaanassessmentofmultipleputativeselectiveagents AT jeraldbjohnson whatdriveslifehistoryvariationinthelivebearingfishpoeciliopsisprolificaanassessmentofmultipleputativeselectiveagents |