Outreach screening to address demographic and economic barriers to diabetic retinopathy care in rural China.

<h4>Importance</h4>Poor access to existing care for diabetic retinopathy (DR) limits effectiveness of proven treatments.<h4>Objectives</h4>We examined whether outreach screening in rural China improves equity of access.<h4>Design, setting and participants</h4>We c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baixiang Xiao, Gareth D Mercer, Ling Jin, Han Lin Lee, Tingting Chen, Yanfang Wang, Yuanping Liu, Alastair K Denniston, Catherine A Egan, Jia Li, Qing Lu, Ping Xu, Nathan Congdon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266380
Description
Summary:<h4>Importance</h4>Poor access to existing care for diabetic retinopathy (DR) limits effectiveness of proven treatments.<h4>Objectives</h4>We examined whether outreach screening in rural China improves equity of access.<h4>Design, setting and participants</h4>We compared prevalence of female sex, age > = 65 years, primary education or below, and requiring referral care for DR between three cohorts with diabetes examined for DR in neighboring areas of Guangdong, China: passive case detection at secondary-level hospitals (n = 193); persons screened during primary-level DR outreach (n = 182); and individuals with newly- or previously-diagnosed diabetes in a population survey (n = 579). The latter reflected the "ideal" reach of a screening program.<h4>Results</h4>Compared to the population cohort, passive case detection reached fewer women (50·8% vs. 62·3%, p = 0·006), older adults (37·8% vs. 51·3%, p < 0·001), and less-educated persons (39·9% vs. 89·6%, p < 0·001). Outreach screening, compared to passive case detection, improved representation of the elderly (49·5% vs. 37·8%, p = 0·03) and less-educated (70·3% vs. 39·9%, p<0·001). The proportion of women (59.8% vs 62.3%, P>0.300) and persons aged > = 65 years (49.5% vs 51.3%, p = 0.723) in the outreach screening and population cohorts did not differ significantly. Prevalence of requiring referral care for DR was significantly higher in the outreach screening cohort (28·0%) than the population (14·0%) and passive case detection cohorts (7·3%, p<0·001 for both).<h4>Conclusions and relevance</h4>Primary-level outreach screening improves access for the poorly-educated and elderly, and removes gender inequity in access to DR care in this setting, while also identifying more severely-affected patients than case finding in hospital.
ISSN:1932-6203