Similarities, Differences, and Missed Connections between Thomas S. Kuhn, Gaston Bachelard and the Continental Historiography of Science
According to the American philosopher, Michael Friedman, while triggering the so-called “historical turn,” Kuhn reinstated the history of science as perhaps the most important object for the philosophy of science. In this paper, I show that this reinstatement is rather a rehabilitation of the philos...
Main Author: | Fragio Alberto |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2020-12-01
|
Series: | HoST |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/host-2020-0016 |
Similar Items
-
Philosophical Elements in Thomas Kuhn's Historiography of Science
by: Paul Hoyningen-Huene
Published: (2012-10-01) -
The basic concepts of F. A. Stepun's philosophy of history
by: Povilaitis V. J.
Published: (2011-04-01) -
Post-Neo-Kantianism. What is this?
by: Andrzej Jan Noras
Published: (2020-12-01) -
On the Subject of Cognition at Historiography of Philosophy
by: Iryna Bondarevska
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Russian Kantianism and Neo-Kantianism of the beginning of the 20th century in the unpublished memoirs of A. A. Borovoi
by: Ryabov P. V.
Published: (2010-12-01)