| Summary: | Background: Boxing, a globally popular combat sport, demands technical precision and powerful strikes at the same time. The kinetic assessment of straight punches, specifically the rear cross and lead jab, is crucial for understanding the biomechanical factors influencing punch effectiveness. This study aims to explore the kinetic properties of these punches in trained boxers, focusing on punch force, acceleration, and the concept of a proximal-to-distal pattern. Methods: Thirteen advanced-level male boxers (body weight 90.6 ± 19.2 kg, height 184.0 ± 7.4 cm, experience 9.5 ± 6.5 y) from local clubs participated in this study. Using a force plate and wireless IMU sensors, we recorded punch force and limb acceleration during the execution of rear-cross and lead-jab punches. Data analysis involved statistical tests to compare the kinetic differences (Mann–Whitney U-test) between the two punch types and assessment of the influence of body mass and training tenure on punch effectiveness (multiple regression analysis). Significant differences were observed between the rear cross and lead jab in terms of total ground reaction force (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mover accent="false"><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mo>¯</mo></mover></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 1709.28 N vs. <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mover accent="false"><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mo>¯</mo></mover></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 1176.55 N), acceleration of the fist (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mover accent="false"><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mo>¯</mo></mover></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 94.33 m/s<sup>2</sup> vs. <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mover accent="false"><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mo>¯</mo></mover></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 66.07 m/s<sup>2</sup>), forearm (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mover accent="false"><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mo>¯</mo></mover></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 67.11 m/s<sup>2</sup> vs. <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mover accent="false"><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mo>¯</mo></mover></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 41.62 m/s<sup>2</sup>) and arm (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mover accent="false"><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mo>¯</mo></mover></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 88.40 m/s<sup>2</sup> vs. <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mover accent="false"><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mo>¯</mo></mover></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 81.36 m/s<sup>2</sup>), and target contact time (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mover accent="false"><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mo>¯</mo></mover></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 0.03 s vs. 0.02 s). The rear-cross punch exhibited higher kinetic values, indicating greater effectiveness. Additionally, body mass and training tenure were identified as significant factors influencing punch force (R<sup>2</sup> score = 0.640). Conclusions: This study confirmed the biomechanical superiority of the rear cross over the lead jab in terms of generated force among trained boxers. The findings highlight the importance of coordination between each segment’s acceleration to generate a powerful strike. These insights are valuable for coaches and athletes in optimizing training strategies for boxing.
|
|---|