Disaggregating geodetic glacier mass balance to annual scale using remote-sensing proxies

Decadal-scale, high-resolution geodetic measurements of glacier thinning have transformed our understanding of glacier response to climate change. Annual glacier mass balance can be estimated using remote-sensing proxies like snow-line altitude. These methods require field data for calibration, whic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Argha Banerjee, Ujjwal Singh, Chintan Sheth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2023-08-01
Series:Journal of Glaciology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143022000892/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797770580091469824
author Argha Banerjee
Ujjwal Singh
Chintan Sheth
author_facet Argha Banerjee
Ujjwal Singh
Chintan Sheth
author_sort Argha Banerjee
collection DOAJ
description Decadal-scale, high-resolution geodetic measurements of glacier thinning have transformed our understanding of glacier response to climate change. Annual glacier mass balance can be estimated using remote-sensing proxies like snow-line altitude. These methods require field data for calibration, which are not available for most glaciers. Here we propose a method that combines multiple remotely-sensed proxies to obtain robust estimates of the annual glacier-wide balance using only remotely-sensed decadal-scale geodetic mass balance for calibration. The method is tested on Chhota Shigri, Argentière and Saint-Sorlin glaciers in the Himalaya and the Alps between 2001 and 2020, using four remotely-sensed proxies – the snow-line altitude, the minimum summer albedo over the glacier and two statistics of normalised difference snow index over the off-glacier area around the ablation zone. The reconstructed mass balance compares favourably with the corresponding glaciological field data (correlation coefficient 0.81 − 0.90, p < 0.001; root mean squared error 0.38 − 0.43 m w.e. a−1). The method presented may be useful to study interannual variability in mass balance on glaciers where no field data are available.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T21:24:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fad94ff6afdc44ca8302c5c088b1e227
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0022-1430
1727-5652
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T21:24:15Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Glaciology
spelling doaj.art-fad94ff6afdc44ca8302c5c088b1e2272023-07-28T10:47:45ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Glaciology0022-14301727-56522023-08-016968369210.1017/jog.2022.89Disaggregating geodetic glacier mass balance to annual scale using remote-sensing proxiesArgha Banerjee0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6007-0719Ujjwal Singh1Chintan Sheth2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2411-9850Earth and Climate Science, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Pune, Dr Homi Bhabha Road, Pune 411008, Maharashtra, IndiaFaculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Praha-Suchdol 16500, Czech RepublicEarth and Climate Science, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Pune, Dr Homi Bhabha Road, Pune 411008, Maharashtra, IndiaDecadal-scale, high-resolution geodetic measurements of glacier thinning have transformed our understanding of glacier response to climate change. Annual glacier mass balance can be estimated using remote-sensing proxies like snow-line altitude. These methods require field data for calibration, which are not available for most glaciers. Here we propose a method that combines multiple remotely-sensed proxies to obtain robust estimates of the annual glacier-wide balance using only remotely-sensed decadal-scale geodetic mass balance for calibration. The method is tested on Chhota Shigri, Argentière and Saint-Sorlin glaciers in the Himalaya and the Alps between 2001 and 2020, using four remotely-sensed proxies – the snow-line altitude, the minimum summer albedo over the glacier and two statistics of normalised difference snow index over the off-glacier area around the ablation zone. The reconstructed mass balance compares favourably with the corresponding glaciological field data (correlation coefficient 0.81 − 0.90, p < 0.001; root mean squared error 0.38 − 0.43 m w.e. a−1). The method presented may be useful to study interannual variability in mass balance on glaciers where no field data are available.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143022000892/type/journal_articleGlacier mass balancemass-balance reconstructionmountain glaciers
spellingShingle Argha Banerjee
Ujjwal Singh
Chintan Sheth
Disaggregating geodetic glacier mass balance to annual scale using remote-sensing proxies
Journal of Glaciology
Glacier mass balance
mass-balance reconstruction
mountain glaciers
title Disaggregating geodetic glacier mass balance to annual scale using remote-sensing proxies
title_full Disaggregating geodetic glacier mass balance to annual scale using remote-sensing proxies
title_fullStr Disaggregating geodetic glacier mass balance to annual scale using remote-sensing proxies
title_full_unstemmed Disaggregating geodetic glacier mass balance to annual scale using remote-sensing proxies
title_short Disaggregating geodetic glacier mass balance to annual scale using remote-sensing proxies
title_sort disaggregating geodetic glacier mass balance to annual scale using remote sensing proxies
topic Glacier mass balance
mass-balance reconstruction
mountain glaciers
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143022000892/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT arghabanerjee disaggregatinggeodeticglaciermassbalancetoannualscaleusingremotesensingproxies
AT ujjwalsingh disaggregatinggeodeticglaciermassbalancetoannualscaleusingremotesensingproxies
AT chintansheth disaggregatinggeodeticglaciermassbalancetoannualscaleusingremotesensingproxies