Difference between clinical and ultrasound screening of developmental hip abnormalities in neonatal period

The development disorder of the hip (DDH) is the most common anomaly of the locomotors’ system and a permanently present problem in pediatric and orthopedic practice, because of its numerous consequences. Despite of all research efforts, the ethiopathogenesis of the illness remains unknown and that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. Brčić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton 2007-08-01
Series:Medicinski Glasnik
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ljkzedo.com.ba/medglasnik/vol42/M_7_5.pdf
_version_ 1818807493364547584
author A. Brčić
author_facet A. Brčić
author_sort A. Brčić
collection DOAJ
description The development disorder of the hip (DDH) is the most common anomaly of the locomotors’ system and a permanently present problem in pediatric and orthopedic practice, because of its numerous consequences. Despite of all research efforts, the ethiopathogenesis of the illness remains unknown and that is the reason why the present efforts in prevention are directed mainly to the secondary prevention. As the incidence of DDH in Bosnia and Herzegovina is the one of the greatest in Europe, this research had a goal to analyze the value of the screening methods which are used in the early detection of the DDH in the neonatal period. The research has been carried out in the counseling service of the Children’s Dispensary of the Health Center and the Private Specialistic Ambulance “Dr Aida” in Zavidovići. In the two years period, 449 newborns (898 hips) had been examined clinically and with the ultrasound. DDH incidence was 6.01%. Sixteen patients with positive ultrasound finding have shown negative clinical finding. Positive findings were found in eleven patients. Positive clinical findings and negative ultrasound findings were found in 32 examined patients. The diagnostic specificity of the clinical examination is relatively low (25.58%); that is, the doctor can only rely on positive tests with 25.58% probability. If we were to make a decision on treatment based on the positive clinical findings, most of the patients would be treated unjustifiably. Although the diagnostic sensitivity was high (96.06%), there were 3.94 % of the false negative findings (a number of newborn with DDH would have remained unrecognized if ultrasound examination had not been performed). In conclusion, clinical examination is obligatory in the counseling offices but we emphasize the need of ultrasound examination in the neonatal period in order to reveal and monitor all suspicious cases.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T19:26:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fadb1af14a4b49dbb87fdda7da053ea0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1840-0132
1840-2445
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T19:26:32Z
publishDate 2007-08-01
publisher Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton
record_format Article
series Medicinski Glasnik
spelling doaj.art-fadb1af14a4b49dbb87fdda7da053ea02022-12-21T20:55:52ZengMedical Association of Zenica-Doboj CantonMedicinski Glasnik1840-01321840-24452007-08-01427983Difference between clinical and ultrasound screening of developmental hip abnormalities in neonatal periodA. BrčićThe development disorder of the hip (DDH) is the most common anomaly of the locomotors’ system and a permanently present problem in pediatric and orthopedic practice, because of its numerous consequences. Despite of all research efforts, the ethiopathogenesis of the illness remains unknown and that is the reason why the present efforts in prevention are directed mainly to the secondary prevention. As the incidence of DDH in Bosnia and Herzegovina is the one of the greatest in Europe, this research had a goal to analyze the value of the screening methods which are used in the early detection of the DDH in the neonatal period. The research has been carried out in the counseling service of the Children’s Dispensary of the Health Center and the Private Specialistic Ambulance “Dr Aida” in Zavidovići. In the two years period, 449 newborns (898 hips) had been examined clinically and with the ultrasound. DDH incidence was 6.01%. Sixteen patients with positive ultrasound finding have shown negative clinical finding. Positive findings were found in eleven patients. Positive clinical findings and negative ultrasound findings were found in 32 examined patients. The diagnostic specificity of the clinical examination is relatively low (25.58%); that is, the doctor can only rely on positive tests with 25.58% probability. If we were to make a decision on treatment based on the positive clinical findings, most of the patients would be treated unjustifiably. Although the diagnostic sensitivity was high (96.06%), there were 3.94 % of the false negative findings (a number of newborn with DDH would have remained unrecognized if ultrasound examination had not been performed). In conclusion, clinical examination is obligatory in the counseling offices but we emphasize the need of ultrasound examination in the neonatal period in order to reveal and monitor all suspicious cases.http://www.ljkzedo.com.ba/medglasnik/vol42/M_7_5.pdfscreeninghipdysplasiaultrasound
spellingShingle A. Brčić
Difference between clinical and ultrasound screening of developmental hip abnormalities in neonatal period
Medicinski Glasnik
screening
hip
dysplasia
ultrasound
title Difference between clinical and ultrasound screening of developmental hip abnormalities in neonatal period
title_full Difference between clinical and ultrasound screening of developmental hip abnormalities in neonatal period
title_fullStr Difference between clinical and ultrasound screening of developmental hip abnormalities in neonatal period
title_full_unstemmed Difference between clinical and ultrasound screening of developmental hip abnormalities in neonatal period
title_short Difference between clinical and ultrasound screening of developmental hip abnormalities in neonatal period
title_sort difference between clinical and ultrasound screening of developmental hip abnormalities in neonatal period
topic screening
hip
dysplasia
ultrasound
url http://www.ljkzedo.com.ba/medglasnik/vol42/M_7_5.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abrcic differencebetweenclinicalandultrasoundscreeningofdevelopmentalhipabnormalitiesinneonatalperiod