Directors’ Duties and Corporate Social Responsibility under German Law – Is Tort Law Litigation Changing the Picture?

This article discusses the right and a potential duty of directors to pursue CSR policies under German law. It first explains the two main duties of directors: to make sure that the company complies with its legal obligations, which has been broadly interpreted in Germany to include the duty to exte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peter Rott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aalborg University Open Publishing 2017-09-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
Online Access:https://somaesthetics.aau.dk/index.php/NJCL/article/view/1979
_version_ 1797230092543328256
author Peter Rott
author_facet Peter Rott
author_sort Peter Rott
collection DOAJ
description This article discusses the right and a potential duty of directors to pursue CSR policies under German law. It first explains the two main duties of directors: to make sure that the company complies with its legal obligations, which has been broadly interpreted in Germany to include the duty to extend to domestic and foreign subsidiaries’ compliance with the law, and to act for the (economic) benefit of the company. CSR policies will often only come under the second duty, which means that they can be pursued if they are economically beneficial. However, acting in order to benefit the company also means the avoidance of unnecessary risk, including the risk of tort law liability. This article discusses how recent tort law development towards a duty of care of parent companies for employees of their subsidiaries, and perhaps even victims of their subsidiaries’ operations, as triggered by the English landmark case of Chandler v Cape, has created risks for parent companies that affect the duty of their directors to establish a corporation-wide system of prevention. It is argued that those liability risks are substantive in amount but uncertain due to the early state of case law, with a number of relevant cases pending at this moment; which allows directors a certain margin of appreciation. The article concludes that the tort law development has certainly strengthened the right of directors to pursue a CSR policy that avoids liability, while a corresponding duty of directors may arise and intensify with the influx of more transnational tort law cases and, in particular, with judgments in favour of victims of torts committed in the course of operations of transnational corporations in developing countries.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T15:22:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fadd69c2177e408a92bfa66a529eb2b7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1459-9686
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:22:59Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher Aalborg University Open Publishing
record_format Article
series Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
spelling doaj.art-fadd69c2177e408a92bfa66a529eb2b72024-04-02T07:29:08ZengAalborg University Open PublishingNordic Journal of Commercial Law1459-96862017-09-01110.5278/ojs.njcl.v0i1.1979Directors’ Duties and Corporate Social Responsibility under German Law – Is Tort Law Litigation Changing the Picture?Peter RottThis article discusses the right and a potential duty of directors to pursue CSR policies under German law. It first explains the two main duties of directors: to make sure that the company complies with its legal obligations, which has been broadly interpreted in Germany to include the duty to extend to domestic and foreign subsidiaries’ compliance with the law, and to act for the (economic) benefit of the company. CSR policies will often only come under the second duty, which means that they can be pursued if they are economically beneficial. However, acting in order to benefit the company also means the avoidance of unnecessary risk, including the risk of tort law liability. This article discusses how recent tort law development towards a duty of care of parent companies for employees of their subsidiaries, and perhaps even victims of their subsidiaries’ operations, as triggered by the English landmark case of Chandler v Cape, has created risks for parent companies that affect the duty of their directors to establish a corporation-wide system of prevention. It is argued that those liability risks are substantive in amount but uncertain due to the early state of case law, with a number of relevant cases pending at this moment; which allows directors a certain margin of appreciation. The article concludes that the tort law development has certainly strengthened the right of directors to pursue a CSR policy that avoids liability, while a corresponding duty of directors may arise and intensify with the influx of more transnational tort law cases and, in particular, with judgments in favour of victims of torts committed in the course of operations of transnational corporations in developing countries.https://somaesthetics.aau.dk/index.php/NJCL/article/view/1979
spellingShingle Peter Rott
Directors’ Duties and Corporate Social Responsibility under German Law – Is Tort Law Litigation Changing the Picture?
Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
title Directors’ Duties and Corporate Social Responsibility under German Law – Is Tort Law Litigation Changing the Picture?
title_full Directors’ Duties and Corporate Social Responsibility under German Law – Is Tort Law Litigation Changing the Picture?
title_fullStr Directors’ Duties and Corporate Social Responsibility under German Law – Is Tort Law Litigation Changing the Picture?
title_full_unstemmed Directors’ Duties and Corporate Social Responsibility under German Law – Is Tort Law Litigation Changing the Picture?
title_short Directors’ Duties and Corporate Social Responsibility under German Law – Is Tort Law Litigation Changing the Picture?
title_sort directors duties and corporate social responsibility under german law is tort law litigation changing the picture
url https://somaesthetics.aau.dk/index.php/NJCL/article/view/1979
work_keys_str_mv AT peterrott directorsdutiesandcorporatesocialresponsibilityundergermanlawistortlawlitigationchangingthepicture