Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as a Useful Prognostic Indicator

ObjectivePrognostic nutritional index (PNI), calculated as serum albumin (ALB) (g/L) + 5 × total lymphocyte count (109/L), is initially used to evaluate nutritional status in patients undergoing surgery and may evaluate the therapeutic effects and predict the survival of various solid tumors. The pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li Chen, Ping Bai, Xiangyi Kong, Shaolong Huang, Zhongzhao Wang, Xiangyu Wang, Yi Fang, Jing Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.656741/full
_version_ 1818617051709702144
author Li Chen
Ping Bai
Xiangyi Kong
Shaolong Huang
Zhongzhao Wang
Xiangyu Wang
Yi Fang
Jing Wang
author_facet Li Chen
Ping Bai
Xiangyi Kong
Shaolong Huang
Zhongzhao Wang
Xiangyu Wang
Yi Fang
Jing Wang
author_sort Li Chen
collection DOAJ
description ObjectivePrognostic nutritional index (PNI), calculated as serum albumin (ALB) (g/L) + 5 × total lymphocyte count (109/L), is initially used to evaluate nutritional status in patients undergoing surgery and may evaluate the therapeutic effects and predict the survival of various solid tumors. The present study aimed to evaluate the potential prognostic significance of PNI in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).MethodsA total of 785 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in this retrospective study. The optimal cutoff value of PNI by receiver operating characteristic curve stratified patients into a low-PNI group (<51) and a high PNI group (≥51). The associations between breast cancer and clinicopathological variables by PNI were determined by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Kaplan–Meier plots and log-rank test were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The prognostic value of PNI was analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. The toxicity of NACT was accessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC).ResultsThe results indicated that PNI had prognostic significance by an optimal cutoff value of 51 on DFS and OS in univariate and multivariate Cox regression survival analyses. Breast cancer patients with a high PNI value had longer DFS and OS than those with a low PNI value [47.64 vs. 36.60 months, P < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.264, 95%CI = 0.160–0.435; 73.61 vs. 64.97 months, P < 0.0001, HR = 0.319, 95%CI = 0.207–0.491, respectively]. Furthermore, the results indicated that patients with high PNI had longer DFS and OS than those with low PNI in early stage and advanced breast cancer, especially in advanced breast cancer. The mean DFS and OS times for breast cancer patients with high PNI by the log-rank test were longer than in those with low PNI in different molecular subtypes. Moreover, the mean DFS and OS times in patients with high PNI by the log-rank test were longer than in those patients with low PNI without or with lymph vessel invasion. The common toxicities after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were hematologic and gastrointestinal reaction, and the PNI had no significance on the toxicities of all enrolled patients, except in anemia, leukopenia, and myelosuppression.ConclusionPretreatment PNI with the advantages of being convenient, noninvasive, and reproducible was a useful prognostic indicator for breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and is a promising biomarker for breast cancer on treatment strategy decisions.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T16:59:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fae207c2a07f4acf8658e92d1a870c27
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-634X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T16:59:33Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
spelling doaj.art-fae207c2a07f4acf8658e92d1a870c272022-12-21T22:23:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology2296-634X2021-03-01910.3389/fcell.2021.656741656741Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as a Useful Prognostic IndicatorLi Chen0Ping Bai1Xiangyi Kong2Shaolong Huang3Zhongzhao Wang4Xiangyu Wang5Yi Fang6Jing Wang7Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Operation Room, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Breast and Thyroid, Traumatic and Plastic Surgery, Tongren Municipal People’s Hospital, Guizhou, ChinaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaObjectivePrognostic nutritional index (PNI), calculated as serum albumin (ALB) (g/L) + 5 × total lymphocyte count (109/L), is initially used to evaluate nutritional status in patients undergoing surgery and may evaluate the therapeutic effects and predict the survival of various solid tumors. The present study aimed to evaluate the potential prognostic significance of PNI in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).MethodsA total of 785 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in this retrospective study. The optimal cutoff value of PNI by receiver operating characteristic curve stratified patients into a low-PNI group (<51) and a high PNI group (≥51). The associations between breast cancer and clinicopathological variables by PNI were determined by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Kaplan–Meier plots and log-rank test were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The prognostic value of PNI was analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. The toxicity of NACT was accessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC).ResultsThe results indicated that PNI had prognostic significance by an optimal cutoff value of 51 on DFS and OS in univariate and multivariate Cox regression survival analyses. Breast cancer patients with a high PNI value had longer DFS and OS than those with a low PNI value [47.64 vs. 36.60 months, P < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.264, 95%CI = 0.160–0.435; 73.61 vs. 64.97 months, P < 0.0001, HR = 0.319, 95%CI = 0.207–0.491, respectively]. Furthermore, the results indicated that patients with high PNI had longer DFS and OS than those with low PNI in early stage and advanced breast cancer, especially in advanced breast cancer. The mean DFS and OS times for breast cancer patients with high PNI by the log-rank test were longer than in those with low PNI in different molecular subtypes. Moreover, the mean DFS and OS times in patients with high PNI by the log-rank test were longer than in those patients with low PNI without or with lymph vessel invasion. The common toxicities after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were hematologic and gastrointestinal reaction, and the PNI had no significance on the toxicities of all enrolled patients, except in anemia, leukopenia, and myelosuppression.ConclusionPretreatment PNI with the advantages of being convenient, noninvasive, and reproducible was a useful prognostic indicator for breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and is a promising biomarker for breast cancer on treatment strategy decisions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.656741/fullprognostic nutritional indexbreast cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapysurvivalbiomarker
spellingShingle Li Chen
Ping Bai
Xiangyi Kong
Shaolong Huang
Zhongzhao Wang
Xiangyu Wang
Yi Fang
Jing Wang
Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as a Useful Prognostic Indicator
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
prognostic nutritional index
breast cancer
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
survival
biomarker
title Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as a Useful Prognostic Indicator
title_full Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as a Useful Prognostic Indicator
title_fullStr Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as a Useful Prognostic Indicator
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as a Useful Prognostic Indicator
title_short Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as a Useful Prognostic Indicator
title_sort prognostic nutritional index pni in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a useful prognostic indicator
topic prognostic nutritional index
breast cancer
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
survival
biomarker
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.656741/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lichen prognosticnutritionalindexpniinpatientswithbreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyasausefulprognosticindicator
AT pingbai prognosticnutritionalindexpniinpatientswithbreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyasausefulprognosticindicator
AT xiangyikong prognosticnutritionalindexpniinpatientswithbreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyasausefulprognosticindicator
AT shaolonghuang prognosticnutritionalindexpniinpatientswithbreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyasausefulprognosticindicator
AT zhongzhaowang prognosticnutritionalindexpniinpatientswithbreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyasausefulprognosticindicator
AT xiangyuwang prognosticnutritionalindexpniinpatientswithbreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyasausefulprognosticindicator
AT yifang prognosticnutritionalindexpniinpatientswithbreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyasausefulprognosticindicator
AT jingwang prognosticnutritionalindexpniinpatientswithbreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyasausefulprognosticindicator