Testing a model of resilience for women leaders: a strengths based approach

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the indirect processes through which cognitive, emotional and behavioural assets function to explain resilience amongst women leaders in higher education institutions. Method A quantitative cross-sectional survey design with a sample of N = 255 wome...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daphne Pillay-Naidoo, Petrus Nel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-12-01
Series:Australian Journal of Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2022.2138542
_version_ 1797685812052099072
author Daphne Pillay-Naidoo
Petrus Nel
author_facet Daphne Pillay-Naidoo
Petrus Nel
author_sort Daphne Pillay-Naidoo
collection DOAJ
description Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the indirect processes through which cognitive, emotional and behavioural assets function to explain resilience amongst women leaders in higher education institutions. Method A quantitative cross-sectional survey design with a sample of N = 255 women leaders from higher education institutions was employed. Results All the proposed indirect pathways were found to be statistically significant and explained a fair proportion of the variance in the resilience scores of women leaders. Results revealed that cognitive assets (self-efficacy and mindfulness) were associated with resilience through association with emotional assets (positive affect and self-regulation) and behavioural assets (problem-solving skills and authentic functioning), both individually and in serial. Conclusions This study offers support for the direct and indirect relationships between mindfulness, self-efficacy, self-regulation, positive affect, authentic functioning, problem solving skills and resilience. It further generates new insights into the indirect processes through which cognitive, emotional and behavioural domains of influence may explain resilience amongst women leaders. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Women leaders remain underrepresented in higher education institutions when compared to their male counterparts. Women leaders who possess higher levels of resilience are more likely to overcome the numerous barriers women face in higher education institutions when compared women leaders with lower levels of resilience. There is an established direct relationship between personal strengths such as self-efficacy, self-regulation and problem-solving ability and resilience. What this topic adds: By investigating the proposed indirect pathways and the interaction between cognitive, emotional and behavioural assets, this study offers a more nuanced approach to understanding the processes that lead to resilience. Using the cognitive-behavioural perspective of psychology as the theoretical framework to support the hypotheses proposed, this study expands the application of the cognitive behavioural model to explain resilience in the work context. This study offers support for a newly proposed model of cognitive, emotional and behavioural domains of influence on resilience.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:56:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fae2c6bf487b486c974714ea86f70ee1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0004-9530
1742-9536
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:56:45Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Australian Journal of Psychology
spelling doaj.art-fae2c6bf487b486c974714ea86f70ee12023-09-14T13:24:38ZengTaylor & Francis GroupAustralian Journal of Psychology0004-95301742-95362022-12-0174110.1080/00049530.2022.21385422138542Testing a model of resilience for women leaders: a strengths based approachDaphne Pillay-Naidoo0Petrus Nel1University of PretoriaUniversity of JohannesburgObjective The aim of this study was to investigate the indirect processes through which cognitive, emotional and behavioural assets function to explain resilience amongst women leaders in higher education institutions. Method A quantitative cross-sectional survey design with a sample of N = 255 women leaders from higher education institutions was employed. Results All the proposed indirect pathways were found to be statistically significant and explained a fair proportion of the variance in the resilience scores of women leaders. Results revealed that cognitive assets (self-efficacy and mindfulness) were associated with resilience through association with emotional assets (positive affect and self-regulation) and behavioural assets (problem-solving skills and authentic functioning), both individually and in serial. Conclusions This study offers support for the direct and indirect relationships between mindfulness, self-efficacy, self-regulation, positive affect, authentic functioning, problem solving skills and resilience. It further generates new insights into the indirect processes through which cognitive, emotional and behavioural domains of influence may explain resilience amongst women leaders. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Women leaders remain underrepresented in higher education institutions when compared to their male counterparts. Women leaders who possess higher levels of resilience are more likely to overcome the numerous barriers women face in higher education institutions when compared women leaders with lower levels of resilience. There is an established direct relationship between personal strengths such as self-efficacy, self-regulation and problem-solving ability and resilience. What this topic adds: By investigating the proposed indirect pathways and the interaction between cognitive, emotional and behavioural assets, this study offers a more nuanced approach to understanding the processes that lead to resilience. Using the cognitive-behavioural perspective of psychology as the theoretical framework to support the hypotheses proposed, this study expands the application of the cognitive behavioural model to explain resilience in the work context. This study offers support for a newly proposed model of cognitive, emotional and behavioural domains of influence on resilience.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2022.2138542female leadershigher educationresiliencestrengths-based approachstructural equation modelling
spellingShingle Daphne Pillay-Naidoo
Petrus Nel
Testing a model of resilience for women leaders: a strengths based approach
Australian Journal of Psychology
female leaders
higher education
resilience
strengths-based approach
structural equation modelling
title Testing a model of resilience for women leaders: a strengths based approach
title_full Testing a model of resilience for women leaders: a strengths based approach
title_fullStr Testing a model of resilience for women leaders: a strengths based approach
title_full_unstemmed Testing a model of resilience for women leaders: a strengths based approach
title_short Testing a model of resilience for women leaders: a strengths based approach
title_sort testing a model of resilience for women leaders a strengths based approach
topic female leaders
higher education
resilience
strengths-based approach
structural equation modelling
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2022.2138542
work_keys_str_mv AT daphnepillaynaidoo testingamodelofresilienceforwomenleadersastrengthsbasedapproach
AT petrusnel testingamodelofresilienceforwomenleadersastrengthsbasedapproach