Extraction of mesioangularly impacted third molar: Dental drill versus crane pick elevator on treatment outcome

BACKGROUND: The use of dental drill during extraction of impacted mandibular third molars lead to production of aerosol, fear in some patients and this necessitates the need for an alternative instrument. OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment outcome in two cohorts of patients after surgical extractio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Charles E Anyanechi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Nigerian Journal of Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.njmonline.org/article.asp?issn=1115-2613;year=2018;volume=27;issue=1;spage=52;epage=58;aulast=Anyanechi;type=0
_version_ 1818607786144038912
author Charles E Anyanechi
author_facet Charles E Anyanechi
author_sort Charles E Anyanechi
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: The use of dental drill during extraction of impacted mandibular third molars lead to production of aerosol, fear in some patients and this necessitates the need for an alternative instrument. OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment outcome in two cohorts of patients after surgical extraction of symptomatic mesio-angularly impacted mandibular third molars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Apparently healthy subjects who presented to the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic of our institution, with an indication for surgical extraction of symptomatic mesio-angularly impacted mandibular third molar were assessed. Those classified as Pell and Gregory class 2 ramus relationship, class A and B depth, with favourable root morphology were uniformly randomized into dental drill and Crane pick elevator groups. Information on demographics, reasons for extraction, trismus, swelling, pain and complaints during follow-up were obtained and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Overall 86 subjects, evenly distributed between the two groups were studied. Post-operative mean for trismus, swelling and pain were lower on the 3rd day in those treated with Crane pick elevator than dental drill. However, by the 7th day, the results were the same as the trismus, swelling and pain resolved clinically, without complication. CONCLUSION: Crane pick dental elevator could serve as a useful substitute to dental drill in the extraction of mild mesioangularly impacted mandibular third molars.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T14:32:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fae7ce699cb64c90b1bb06fda41db7ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1115-2613
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T14:32:17Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Nigerian Journal of Medicine
spelling doaj.art-fae7ce699cb64c90b1bb06fda41db7ef2022-12-21T22:28:13ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsNigerian Journal of Medicine1115-26132018-01-01271525810.4103/1115-2613.278230Extraction of mesioangularly impacted third molar: Dental drill versus crane pick elevator on treatment outcomeCharles E AnyanechiBACKGROUND: The use of dental drill during extraction of impacted mandibular third molars lead to production of aerosol, fear in some patients and this necessitates the need for an alternative instrument. OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment outcome in two cohorts of patients after surgical extraction of symptomatic mesio-angularly impacted mandibular third molars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Apparently healthy subjects who presented to the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic of our institution, with an indication for surgical extraction of symptomatic mesio-angularly impacted mandibular third molar were assessed. Those classified as Pell and Gregory class 2 ramus relationship, class A and B depth, with favourable root morphology were uniformly randomized into dental drill and Crane pick elevator groups. Information on demographics, reasons for extraction, trismus, swelling, pain and complaints during follow-up were obtained and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Overall 86 subjects, evenly distributed between the two groups were studied. Post-operative mean for trismus, swelling and pain were lower on the 3rd day in those treated with Crane pick elevator than dental drill. However, by the 7th day, the results were the same as the trismus, swelling and pain resolved clinically, without complication. CONCLUSION: Crane pick dental elevator could serve as a useful substitute to dental drill in the extraction of mild mesioangularly impacted mandibular third molars.http://www.njmonline.org/article.asp?issn=1115-2613;year=2018;volume=27;issue=1;spage=52;epage=58;aulast=Anyanechi;type=0crane pick elevatordental drillmesio-angular impactionosteotomy
spellingShingle Charles E Anyanechi
Extraction of mesioangularly impacted third molar: Dental drill versus crane pick elevator on treatment outcome
Nigerian Journal of Medicine
crane pick elevator
dental drill
mesio-angular impaction
osteotomy
title Extraction of mesioangularly impacted third molar: Dental drill versus crane pick elevator on treatment outcome
title_full Extraction of mesioangularly impacted third molar: Dental drill versus crane pick elevator on treatment outcome
title_fullStr Extraction of mesioangularly impacted third molar: Dental drill versus crane pick elevator on treatment outcome
title_full_unstemmed Extraction of mesioangularly impacted third molar: Dental drill versus crane pick elevator on treatment outcome
title_short Extraction of mesioangularly impacted third molar: Dental drill versus crane pick elevator on treatment outcome
title_sort extraction of mesioangularly impacted third molar dental drill versus crane pick elevator on treatment outcome
topic crane pick elevator
dental drill
mesio-angular impaction
osteotomy
url http://www.njmonline.org/article.asp?issn=1115-2613;year=2018;volume=27;issue=1;spage=52;epage=58;aulast=Anyanechi;type=0
work_keys_str_mv AT charleseanyanechi extractionofmesioangularlyimpactedthirdmolardentaldrillversuscranepickelevatorontreatmentoutcome