A comparison of BeadChip and WGS genotyping outputs using partial validation by sanger sequencing
Abstract Background Head-to-head comparison of BeadChip and WGS/WES genotyping techniques for their precision is far from straightforward. A tool for validation of high-throughput genotyping calls such as Sanger sequencing is neither scalable nor practical for large-scale DNA processing. Here we rep...
Main Authors: | Kirill A. Danilov, Dimitri A. Nikogosov, Sergey V. Musienko, Ancha V. Baranova |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Genomics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12864-020-06919-x |
Similar Items
-
GenESysV: a fast, intuitive and scalable genome exploration open source tool for variants generated from high-throughput sequencing projects
by: Mohammad Zia, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Comparing BeadChip and WGS Genotyping: Non-Technical Failed Calling Is Attributable to Additional Variation within the Probe Target Sequence
by: Moran Gershoni, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
A Python script to merge Sanger sequences
by: Cen Chen, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Double Nobel prize winner: Frederick Sanger – the father of genomics
by: T. V. Danylova, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Whole exome sequencing reveals two novel compound heterozygous mutations in TWNK as a cause of the hepatocerebral form of mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome: a case report
by: Xianghong Li, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)