TUNEL labeling with BrdUTP/anti-BrdUTP greatly underestimates the level of sperm DNA fragmentation in semen evaluation.

Many studies have now confirmed that sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is associated with a poorer outcome of some forms of assisted reproduction technology. For this reason, SDF is an important parameter to evaluate in male fertility assessment. TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick en...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sofia C Ribeiro, Monica Muratori, Maria De Geyter, Christian De Geyter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5546573?pdf=render
_version_ 1819048511300173824
author Sofia C Ribeiro
Monica Muratori
Maria De Geyter
Christian De Geyter
author_facet Sofia C Ribeiro
Monica Muratori
Maria De Geyter
Christian De Geyter
author_sort Sofia C Ribeiro
collection DOAJ
description Many studies have now confirmed that sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is associated with a poorer outcome of some forms of assisted reproduction technology. For this reason, SDF is an important parameter to evaluate in male fertility assessment. TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling) assay coupled to flow cytometry is one of the most promising methods for SDF quantification. Several kits for the detection of DNA fragmentation are currently available on the market and all are recommended as equally appropriate to quantify SDF. In this work we compared for the first time the efficacy of two different types of TUNEL kits for SDF quantification: one using an indirect antibody-based labeling system (BrdUTP/fluorescein-anti-BrdUTP) and another using a direct labeling system (fluorescein-dUTP). We demonstrated that TUNEL indirect labeling system largely underestimates SDF when compared with the direct labeling, the differences ranging from 19.2% to 85.3% (p<0.05, n = 22). We observed that these differences were most pronounced among dead spermatozoa where indirect labeling stained 40.1% [23.6%, 58.2%] and the direct system 65.7% [36.5%, 90.9%] (n = 10, p<0.05). Interestingly, we found that both systems stained the living spermatozoa with the same efficiency. We showed that the differences are due to the steric hindrance of the antibody during its binding to the BrdUTP. Indeed, after sperm DNA decondensation, the percentages of TUNEL positivity increased significantly from 46.3% [31.8%, 61.7%] to 97.5% [96.1%, 98.8%] (p<0.05, n = 5). Our results are important for future use of TUNEL in clinical practice. Laboratories relying on the use of an antibody-based system heavily underestimate SDF, most particularly in infertile patients with reduced sperm motility. As a consequence, the kit using BrdUTP/fluorescein-anti-BrdUTP should not be recommended as a method to assay DNA damage in semen. This study represents one further step in the standardization of TUNEL among laboratories.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T11:17:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fb03dd28522e4d6ba8914c3a594f48f7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T11:17:25Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-fb03dd28522e4d6ba8914c3a594f48f72022-12-21T19:05:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01128e018180210.1371/journal.pone.0181802TUNEL labeling with BrdUTP/anti-BrdUTP greatly underestimates the level of sperm DNA fragmentation in semen evaluation.Sofia C RibeiroMonica MuratoriMaria De GeyterChristian De GeyterMany studies have now confirmed that sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is associated with a poorer outcome of some forms of assisted reproduction technology. For this reason, SDF is an important parameter to evaluate in male fertility assessment. TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling) assay coupled to flow cytometry is one of the most promising methods for SDF quantification. Several kits for the detection of DNA fragmentation are currently available on the market and all are recommended as equally appropriate to quantify SDF. In this work we compared for the first time the efficacy of two different types of TUNEL kits for SDF quantification: one using an indirect antibody-based labeling system (BrdUTP/fluorescein-anti-BrdUTP) and another using a direct labeling system (fluorescein-dUTP). We demonstrated that TUNEL indirect labeling system largely underestimates SDF when compared with the direct labeling, the differences ranging from 19.2% to 85.3% (p<0.05, n = 22). We observed that these differences were most pronounced among dead spermatozoa where indirect labeling stained 40.1% [23.6%, 58.2%] and the direct system 65.7% [36.5%, 90.9%] (n = 10, p<0.05). Interestingly, we found that both systems stained the living spermatozoa with the same efficiency. We showed that the differences are due to the steric hindrance of the antibody during its binding to the BrdUTP. Indeed, after sperm DNA decondensation, the percentages of TUNEL positivity increased significantly from 46.3% [31.8%, 61.7%] to 97.5% [96.1%, 98.8%] (p<0.05, n = 5). Our results are important for future use of TUNEL in clinical practice. Laboratories relying on the use of an antibody-based system heavily underestimate SDF, most particularly in infertile patients with reduced sperm motility. As a consequence, the kit using BrdUTP/fluorescein-anti-BrdUTP should not be recommended as a method to assay DNA damage in semen. This study represents one further step in the standardization of TUNEL among laboratories.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5546573?pdf=render
spellingShingle Sofia C Ribeiro
Monica Muratori
Maria De Geyter
Christian De Geyter
TUNEL labeling with BrdUTP/anti-BrdUTP greatly underestimates the level of sperm DNA fragmentation in semen evaluation.
PLoS ONE
title TUNEL labeling with BrdUTP/anti-BrdUTP greatly underestimates the level of sperm DNA fragmentation in semen evaluation.
title_full TUNEL labeling with BrdUTP/anti-BrdUTP greatly underestimates the level of sperm DNA fragmentation in semen evaluation.
title_fullStr TUNEL labeling with BrdUTP/anti-BrdUTP greatly underestimates the level of sperm DNA fragmentation in semen evaluation.
title_full_unstemmed TUNEL labeling with BrdUTP/anti-BrdUTP greatly underestimates the level of sperm DNA fragmentation in semen evaluation.
title_short TUNEL labeling with BrdUTP/anti-BrdUTP greatly underestimates the level of sperm DNA fragmentation in semen evaluation.
title_sort tunel labeling with brdutp anti brdutp greatly underestimates the level of sperm dna fragmentation in semen evaluation
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5546573?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sofiacribeiro tunellabelingwithbrdutpantibrdutpgreatlyunderestimatesthelevelofspermdnafragmentationinsemenevaluation
AT monicamuratori tunellabelingwithbrdutpantibrdutpgreatlyunderestimatesthelevelofspermdnafragmentationinsemenevaluation
AT mariadegeyter tunellabelingwithbrdutpantibrdutpgreatlyunderestimatesthelevelofspermdnafragmentationinsemenevaluation
AT christiandegeyter tunellabelingwithbrdutpantibrdutpgreatlyunderestimatesthelevelofspermdnafragmentationinsemenevaluation