The Swedish Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study Including Thresholds Levels

BackgroundTo enhance the efficacy of information and communication, health care has increasingly turned to digitalization. Electronic health (eHealth) is an important factor that influences the use and receipt of benefits from Web-based health resources. Consequently, the concept of eHealth literacy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wångdahl, Josefin, Jaensson, Maria, Dahlberg, Karuna, Nilsson, Ulrica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2020-02-01
Series:JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Online Access:https://mhealth.jmir.org/2020/2/e16316
_version_ 1818565390153809920
author Wångdahl, Josefin
Jaensson, Maria
Dahlberg, Karuna
Nilsson, Ulrica
author_facet Wångdahl, Josefin
Jaensson, Maria
Dahlberg, Karuna
Nilsson, Ulrica
author_sort Wångdahl, Josefin
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundTo enhance the efficacy of information and communication, health care has increasingly turned to digitalization. Electronic health (eHealth) is an important factor that influences the use and receipt of benefits from Web-based health resources. Consequently, the concept of eHealth literacy has emerged, and in 2006 Norman and Skinner developed an 8-item self-report instrument to measure these skills: the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS). However, the eHEALS has not been tested for reliability and validity in the general Swedish population and no threshold values have been established. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to translate and adapt eHEALS into a Swedish version; evaluate convergent validity and psychometric properties; and determine threshold levels for inadequate, problematic, and sufficient eHealth literacy. MethodsProspective psychometric evaluation study included 323 participants equally distributed between sexes with a mean age of 49 years recruited from 12 different arenas. ResultsThere were some difficulties translating the English concept health resources. This resulted in this concept being translated as health information (ie, Hälsoinformation in Swedish). The eHEALS total score was 29.3 (SD 6.2), Cronbach alpha .94, Spearman-Brown coefficient .96, and response rate 94.6%. All a priori hypotheses were confirmed, supporting convergent validity. The test-retest reliability indicated an almost perfect agreement, .86 (P<.001). An exploratory factor analysis found one component explaining 64% of the total variance. No floor or ceiling effect was noted. Thresholds levels were set at 8 to 20 = inadequate, 21 to 26 = problematic, and 27 to 40 = sufficient, and there were no significant differences in distribution of the three levels between the Swedish version of eHEALS and the HLS-EU-Q16. ConclusionsThe Swedish version of eHEALS was assessed as being unidimensional with high internal consistency of the instrument, making the reliability adequate. Adapted threshold levels for inadequate, problematic, and sufficient levels of eHealth literacy seem to be relevant. However, there are some linguistic issues relating to the concept of health resources.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T01:40:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fb132b2df7c64130ab944285f11adc78
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2291-5222
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T01:40:38Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR mHealth and uHealth
spelling doaj.art-fb132b2df7c64130ab944285f11adc782022-12-21T23:21:45ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR mHealth and uHealth2291-52222020-02-0182e1631610.2196/16316The Swedish Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study Including Thresholds LevelsWångdahl, JosefinJaensson, MariaDahlberg, KarunaNilsson, UlricaBackgroundTo enhance the efficacy of information and communication, health care has increasingly turned to digitalization. Electronic health (eHealth) is an important factor that influences the use and receipt of benefits from Web-based health resources. Consequently, the concept of eHealth literacy has emerged, and in 2006 Norman and Skinner developed an 8-item self-report instrument to measure these skills: the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS). However, the eHEALS has not been tested for reliability and validity in the general Swedish population and no threshold values have been established. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to translate and adapt eHEALS into a Swedish version; evaluate convergent validity and psychometric properties; and determine threshold levels for inadequate, problematic, and sufficient eHealth literacy. MethodsProspective psychometric evaluation study included 323 participants equally distributed between sexes with a mean age of 49 years recruited from 12 different arenas. ResultsThere were some difficulties translating the English concept health resources. This resulted in this concept being translated as health information (ie, Hälsoinformation in Swedish). The eHEALS total score was 29.3 (SD 6.2), Cronbach alpha .94, Spearman-Brown coefficient .96, and response rate 94.6%. All a priori hypotheses were confirmed, supporting convergent validity. The test-retest reliability indicated an almost perfect agreement, .86 (P<.001). An exploratory factor analysis found one component explaining 64% of the total variance. No floor or ceiling effect was noted. Thresholds levels were set at 8 to 20 = inadequate, 21 to 26 = problematic, and 27 to 40 = sufficient, and there were no significant differences in distribution of the three levels between the Swedish version of eHEALS and the HLS-EU-Q16. ConclusionsThe Swedish version of eHEALS was assessed as being unidimensional with high internal consistency of the instrument, making the reliability adequate. Adapted threshold levels for inadequate, problematic, and sufficient levels of eHealth literacy seem to be relevant. However, there are some linguistic issues relating to the concept of health resources.https://mhealth.jmir.org/2020/2/e16316
spellingShingle Wångdahl, Josefin
Jaensson, Maria
Dahlberg, Karuna
Nilsson, Ulrica
The Swedish Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study Including Thresholds Levels
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
title The Swedish Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study Including Thresholds Levels
title_full The Swedish Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study Including Thresholds Levels
title_fullStr The Swedish Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study Including Thresholds Levels
title_full_unstemmed The Swedish Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study Including Thresholds Levels
title_short The Swedish Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study Including Thresholds Levels
title_sort swedish version of the electronic health literacy scale prospective psychometric evaluation study including thresholds levels
url https://mhealth.jmir.org/2020/2/e16316
work_keys_str_mv AT wangdahljosefin theswedishversionoftheelectronichealthliteracyscaleprospectivepsychometricevaluationstudyincludingthresholdslevels
AT jaenssonmaria theswedishversionoftheelectronichealthliteracyscaleprospectivepsychometricevaluationstudyincludingthresholdslevels
AT dahlbergkaruna theswedishversionoftheelectronichealthliteracyscaleprospectivepsychometricevaluationstudyincludingthresholdslevels
AT nilssonulrica theswedishversionoftheelectronichealthliteracyscaleprospectivepsychometricevaluationstudyincludingthresholdslevels
AT wangdahljosefin swedishversionoftheelectronichealthliteracyscaleprospectivepsychometricevaluationstudyincludingthresholdslevels
AT jaenssonmaria swedishversionoftheelectronichealthliteracyscaleprospectivepsychometricevaluationstudyincludingthresholdslevels
AT dahlbergkaruna swedishversionoftheelectronichealthliteracyscaleprospectivepsychometricevaluationstudyincludingthresholdslevels
AT nilssonulrica swedishversionoftheelectronichealthliteracyscaleprospectivepsychometricevaluationstudyincludingthresholdslevels