The Effect of a Higher Bias Gas Flow on Imposed T-Piece Resistance and Breathing in Preterm Infants at Birth

ObjectiveThe resistance created by the PEEP-valve of a T-piece resuscitator is bias gas flow dependent and might affect breathing in preterm infants. In this study we investigated the effect of a higher bias gas flow on the imposed inspiratory and expiratory T-piece resistance and expiratory breakin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristel L. A. M. Kuypers, Lieve A. Willemsen, Sophie J. E. Cramer, Aidan J. Kashyap, Thomas Drevhammar, Stuart B. Hooper, Arjan B. te Pas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.817010/full
_version_ 1818289778869665792
author Kristel L. A. M. Kuypers
Lieve A. Willemsen
Sophie J. E. Cramer
Aidan J. Kashyap
Aidan J. Kashyap
Thomas Drevhammar
Thomas Drevhammar
Stuart B. Hooper
Stuart B. Hooper
Arjan B. te Pas
author_facet Kristel L. A. M. Kuypers
Lieve A. Willemsen
Sophie J. E. Cramer
Aidan J. Kashyap
Aidan J. Kashyap
Thomas Drevhammar
Thomas Drevhammar
Stuart B. Hooper
Stuart B. Hooper
Arjan B. te Pas
author_sort Kristel L. A. M. Kuypers
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveThe resistance created by the PEEP-valve of a T-piece resuscitator is bias gas flow dependent and might affect breathing in preterm infants. In this study we investigated the effect of a higher bias gas flow on the imposed inspiratory and expiratory T-piece resistance and expiratory breaking manoeuvres (EBM) in preterm infants during spontaneous breathing on CPAP at birth.MethodsIn a retrospective pre-post implementation study of preterm infants <32 weeks gestation, who were stabilised with a T-piece resuscitator, a bias gas flow of 12 L/min was compared to 8 L/min. All spontaneous breaths on CPAP within the first 10 min of starting respiratory support were analysed on a breath-by-breath basis to determine the breathing pattern of each breath and to calculate the imposed inspiratory and expiratory T-piece resistance (Ri, Re), flow rates and tidal volume.ResultsIn total, 54 infants were included (bias gas flow 12 L/min: n = 27, 8 L/min: n = 27) with a median GA of 29+6 (28+4–30+3) and 28+5 (25+6–30+3), respectively (p = 0.182). Ri and Re were significantly lower in the 12 L/min compared to 8 L/min bias flow group [Ri: 29.6 (26.1–33.6) vs. 46.4 (43.0–54.1) cm H2O/L/s, p < 0.001; Re: 32.0 (30.0–35.1) vs. 48.0 (46.3–53.9) cm H2O/L/s, p < 0.001], while the incidence of EBM [77% (53–88) vs. 77% (58–90), p = 0.586] was similar.ConclusionDuring stabilisation of preterm infants at birth with a T-piece resuscitator, the use of a higher bias gas flow reduced both the imposed inspiratory and expiratory T-piece resistance for the infant, but this did not influence the incidence of EBMs.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T02:17:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fb20b028ef8444cb9204b8d61f9f9f70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2360
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T02:17:41Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-fb20b028ef8444cb9204b8d61f9f9f702022-12-22T00:02:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602022-03-011010.3389/fped.2022.817010817010The Effect of a Higher Bias Gas Flow on Imposed T-Piece Resistance and Breathing in Preterm Infants at BirthKristel L. A. M. Kuypers0Lieve A. Willemsen1Sophie J. E. Cramer2Aidan J. Kashyap3Aidan J. Kashyap4Thomas Drevhammar5Thomas Drevhammar6Stuart B. Hooper7Stuart B. Hooper8Arjan B. te Pas9Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Willem-Alexander Children’s Hospital, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, NetherlandsDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Willem-Alexander Children’s Hospital, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, NetherlandsDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Willem-Alexander Children’s Hospital, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, NetherlandsThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Östersund Hospital, Östersund, SwedenThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Willem-Alexander Children’s Hospital, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, NetherlandsObjectiveThe resistance created by the PEEP-valve of a T-piece resuscitator is bias gas flow dependent and might affect breathing in preterm infants. In this study we investigated the effect of a higher bias gas flow on the imposed inspiratory and expiratory T-piece resistance and expiratory breaking manoeuvres (EBM) in preterm infants during spontaneous breathing on CPAP at birth.MethodsIn a retrospective pre-post implementation study of preterm infants <32 weeks gestation, who were stabilised with a T-piece resuscitator, a bias gas flow of 12 L/min was compared to 8 L/min. All spontaneous breaths on CPAP within the first 10 min of starting respiratory support were analysed on a breath-by-breath basis to determine the breathing pattern of each breath and to calculate the imposed inspiratory and expiratory T-piece resistance (Ri, Re), flow rates and tidal volume.ResultsIn total, 54 infants were included (bias gas flow 12 L/min: n = 27, 8 L/min: n = 27) with a median GA of 29+6 (28+4–30+3) and 28+5 (25+6–30+3), respectively (p = 0.182). Ri and Re were significantly lower in the 12 L/min compared to 8 L/min bias flow group [Ri: 29.6 (26.1–33.6) vs. 46.4 (43.0–54.1) cm H2O/L/s, p < 0.001; Re: 32.0 (30.0–35.1) vs. 48.0 (46.3–53.9) cm H2O/L/s, p < 0.001], while the incidence of EBM [77% (53–88) vs. 77% (58–90), p = 0.586] was similar.ConclusionDuring stabilisation of preterm infants at birth with a T-piece resuscitator, the use of a higher bias gas flow reduced both the imposed inspiratory and expiratory T-piece resistance for the infant, but this did not influence the incidence of EBMs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.817010/fullneonatal resuscitationpreterm infantsimposed resistanceT-piecebias gas flowbreathing
spellingShingle Kristel L. A. M. Kuypers
Lieve A. Willemsen
Sophie J. E. Cramer
Aidan J. Kashyap
Aidan J. Kashyap
Thomas Drevhammar
Thomas Drevhammar
Stuart B. Hooper
Stuart B. Hooper
Arjan B. te Pas
The Effect of a Higher Bias Gas Flow on Imposed T-Piece Resistance and Breathing in Preterm Infants at Birth
Frontiers in Pediatrics
neonatal resuscitation
preterm infants
imposed resistance
T-piece
bias gas flow
breathing
title The Effect of a Higher Bias Gas Flow on Imposed T-Piece Resistance and Breathing in Preterm Infants at Birth
title_full The Effect of a Higher Bias Gas Flow on Imposed T-Piece Resistance and Breathing in Preterm Infants at Birth
title_fullStr The Effect of a Higher Bias Gas Flow on Imposed T-Piece Resistance and Breathing in Preterm Infants at Birth
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of a Higher Bias Gas Flow on Imposed T-Piece Resistance and Breathing in Preterm Infants at Birth
title_short The Effect of a Higher Bias Gas Flow on Imposed T-Piece Resistance and Breathing in Preterm Infants at Birth
title_sort effect of a higher bias gas flow on imposed t piece resistance and breathing in preterm infants at birth
topic neonatal resuscitation
preterm infants
imposed resistance
T-piece
bias gas flow
breathing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.817010/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kristellamkuypers theeffectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT lieveawillemsen theeffectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT sophiejecramer theeffectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT aidanjkashyap theeffectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT aidanjkashyap theeffectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT thomasdrevhammar theeffectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT thomasdrevhammar theeffectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT stuartbhooper theeffectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT stuartbhooper theeffectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT arjanbtepas theeffectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT kristellamkuypers effectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT lieveawillemsen effectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT sophiejecramer effectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT aidanjkashyap effectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT aidanjkashyap effectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT thomasdrevhammar effectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT thomasdrevhammar effectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT stuartbhooper effectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT stuartbhooper effectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth
AT arjanbtepas effectofahigherbiasgasflowonimposedtpieceresistanceandbreathinginpreterminfantsatbirth