The Effect of Mouthwashes on Surface Hardness of Dental Ceramics
Statement of problem: The effect of different mouthrinses on the surface characteristics of ceramic materials is not documented. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of three mouthrinses, containing either alcohol, hydrogen peroxide or fluoride, on microhardness of two d...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
2014-09-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Dental Biomaterial |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://jdb.sums.ac.ir/index.php/jdb/article/viewFile/10/6 |
| _version_ | 1811198208954597376 |
|---|---|
| author | Jafari K Hekmatfar S Badakhsh S |
| author_facet | Jafari K Hekmatfar S Badakhsh S |
| author_sort | Jafari K |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Statement of problem: The effect of different mouthrinses on the surface characteristics
of ceramic materials is not documented.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of three mouthrinses,
containing either alcohol, hydrogen peroxide or fluoride, on microhardness of two
dental ceramics, (Duceram love, IPS e.max Ceram).
Materials and Methods: Eighty cylindrical disks were prepared and divided into
eight experimental groups (n=10 for each group) according to the ceramic material
and storage solutions. The microhardness of each sample in all groups was recorded
prior to testing. For each ceramic, three groups were immersed in one of the three
mouthrinses for a total of 24 and 96 hours. The fourth group was immersed in distilled
water as the control. At the end the specimens were taken out, rinsed, dried and tested
using microhardness tester.
Results: The results of the two-way ANOVA indicated that there was no interaction
between media, time and materials (P>0.05). Microhardness of the ceramics was not
adversely affected by immersion in the studied mouthrinses.
Conclusions: The patients with porcelain restorations should be assured that using
mouthrinses containing hydrogen peroxide, alcohol or fluoride do not damage the
surface hardness of the porcelain. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T01:26:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-fb2110f0e90d4931aae1d3e9eca79195 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2383-3971 2383-398X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T01:26:58Z |
| publishDate | 2014-09-01 |
| publisher | Shiraz University of Medical Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Dental Biomaterial |
| spelling | doaj.art-fb2110f0e90d4931aae1d3e9eca791952022-12-22T03:53:37ZengShiraz University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Biomaterial2383-39712383-398X2014-09-0111The Effect of Mouthwashes on Surface Hardness of Dental CeramicsJafari K0Hekmatfar S1Badakhsh S2Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, IranDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, IranDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, IranStatement of problem: The effect of different mouthrinses on the surface characteristics of ceramic materials is not documented. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of three mouthrinses, containing either alcohol, hydrogen peroxide or fluoride, on microhardness of two dental ceramics, (Duceram love, IPS e.max Ceram). Materials and Methods: Eighty cylindrical disks were prepared and divided into eight experimental groups (n=10 for each group) according to the ceramic material and storage solutions. The microhardness of each sample in all groups was recorded prior to testing. For each ceramic, three groups were immersed in one of the three mouthrinses for a total of 24 and 96 hours. The fourth group was immersed in distilled water as the control. At the end the specimens were taken out, rinsed, dried and tested using microhardness tester. Results: The results of the two-way ANOVA indicated that there was no interaction between media, time and materials (P>0.05). Microhardness of the ceramics was not adversely affected by immersion in the studied mouthrinses. Conclusions: The patients with porcelain restorations should be assured that using mouthrinses containing hydrogen peroxide, alcohol or fluoride do not damage the surface hardness of the porcelain.http://jdb.sums.ac.ir/index.php/jdb/article/viewFile/10/6HardnessMouthrinseDental Ceramics |
| spellingShingle | Jafari K Hekmatfar S Badakhsh S The Effect of Mouthwashes on Surface Hardness of Dental Ceramics Journal of Dental Biomaterial Hardness Mouthrinse Dental Ceramics |
| title | The Effect of Mouthwashes on Surface Hardness of Dental Ceramics |
| title_full | The Effect of Mouthwashes on Surface Hardness of Dental Ceramics |
| title_fullStr | The Effect of Mouthwashes on Surface Hardness of Dental Ceramics |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Mouthwashes on Surface Hardness of Dental Ceramics |
| title_short | The Effect of Mouthwashes on Surface Hardness of Dental Ceramics |
| title_sort | effect of mouthwashes on surface hardness of dental ceramics |
| topic | Hardness Mouthrinse Dental Ceramics |
| url | http://jdb.sums.ac.ir/index.php/jdb/article/viewFile/10/6 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jafarik theeffectofmouthwashesonsurfacehardnessofdentalceramics AT hekmatfars theeffectofmouthwashesonsurfacehardnessofdentalceramics AT badakhshs theeffectofmouthwashesonsurfacehardnessofdentalceramics AT jafarik effectofmouthwashesonsurfacehardnessofdentalceramics AT hekmatfars effectofmouthwashesonsurfacehardnessofdentalceramics AT badakhshs effectofmouthwashesonsurfacehardnessofdentalceramics |