Methodological notes on model comparisons and strategy classification: A falsificationist proposition
Taking a falsificationist perspective, the present paper identifies two major shortcomings of existing approaches to comparative model evaluations in general and strategy classifications in particular. These are (1) failure to consider systematic error and (2) neglect of global model fit. Using adhe...
Main Authors: | Morten Moshagen, Benjamin E. Hilbig, Andreas Glöckner |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2011-12-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S193029750000423X/type/journal_article |
Similar Items
-
Methodological notes on model comparisons and strategy classification: A falsificationist proposition
by: Morten Moshagen, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01) -
The empirical content of theories in judgment and decision making: Shortcomings and remedies
by: Andreas Glöckner, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01) -
A shift in strategy or “error”? Strategy classification over multiple stochastic specifications
by: Clintin P. Davis-Stober, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01) -
Diagnostic Task Selection for Strategy Classification in Judgment and Decision Making: Theory, Validation, and Implementation in R
by: Marc Jekel, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01) -
Pair-wise comparisons of multiple models
by: Stephen B. Broomell, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01)