Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction

Mandible defects are conventionally reconstructed using titanium plates. However, titanium causes metallic artifacts which impair radiological imaging. This study aims at evaluating mechanical fatigue of radiolucent fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (f-PEEK), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyeth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julian Lommen, Lara Schorn, Christoph Sproll, Norbert R. Kübler, Luis Fernando Nicolini, Ricarda Merfort, Ayimire Dilimulati, Frank Hildebrand, Majeed Rana, Johannes Greven
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/12/3308
_version_ 1797486131496878080
author Julian Lommen
Lara Schorn
Christoph Sproll
Norbert R. Kübler
Luis Fernando Nicolini
Ricarda Merfort
Ayimire Dilimulati
Frank Hildebrand
Majeed Rana
Johannes Greven
author_facet Julian Lommen
Lara Schorn
Christoph Sproll
Norbert R. Kübler
Luis Fernando Nicolini
Ricarda Merfort
Ayimire Dilimulati
Frank Hildebrand
Majeed Rana
Johannes Greven
author_sort Julian Lommen
collection DOAJ
description Mandible defects are conventionally reconstructed using titanium plates. However, titanium causes metallic artifacts which impair radiological imaging. This study aims at evaluating mechanical fatigue of radiolucent fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (f-PEEK), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), and polyphenylsulfone (PPSU) polymer plates for mandible reconstruction. A total of 30 plates (titanium [n = 6], f-PEEK [n = 6], PEEK [n = 6], PEKK [n = 6], PPSU [n = 6]) were implanted in synthetic mandibulectomized polyurethane mandibles. Servo-pneumatic mechanical testing with cyclic application of 30–300 N at 3 Hz was conducted. Bite forces were 70% on the unresected and 30% on the resected side. Total number of cycles was set to 250,000. Testing was aborted in case of plate or screw failure. Axial load to failure was tested with a speed of 1 mm/s. Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc tests were used. Titanium, f-PEEK, and PEEK showed no failure in fatigue testing and PPSU (<i>p</i> < 0.001) failed against titanium, f-PEEK, PEEK, and PEKK. Titanium allowed the highest load to failure compared to f-PEEK (<i>p</i> = 0.049), PEEK (<i>p</i> = 0.008), PEKK (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and PPSU (<i>p</i> = 0.007). f-PEEK, PEEK, and PEKK withstood expected physiological bite force. Although titanium plates provided the highest fatigue strength, f-PEEK and PEEK plates showed no failure over 250,000 chewing cycles indicating sufficient mechanical strength for mandible reconstruction.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:28:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fb255e0992c8455fb620043b0e1eb345
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:28:50Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-fb255e0992c8455fb620043b0e1eb3452023-11-23T17:13:51ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-06-011112330810.3390/jcm11123308Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible ReconstructionJulian Lommen0Lara Schorn1Christoph Sproll2Norbert R. Kübler3Luis Fernando Nicolini4Ricarda Merfort5Ayimire Dilimulati6Frank Hildebrand7Majeed Rana8Johannes Greven9Department of Oral-, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Dusseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Oral-, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Dusseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Oral-, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Dusseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Oral-, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Dusseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstreet 30, 52074 Aachen, GermanyDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstreet 30, 52074 Aachen, GermanyDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstreet 30, 52074 Aachen, GermanyDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstreet 30, 52074 Aachen, GermanyDepartment of Oral-, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Dusseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstreet 30, 52074 Aachen, GermanyMandible defects are conventionally reconstructed using titanium plates. However, titanium causes metallic artifacts which impair radiological imaging. This study aims at evaluating mechanical fatigue of radiolucent fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (f-PEEK), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), and polyphenylsulfone (PPSU) polymer plates for mandible reconstruction. A total of 30 plates (titanium [n = 6], f-PEEK [n = 6], PEEK [n = 6], PEKK [n = 6], PPSU [n = 6]) were implanted in synthetic mandibulectomized polyurethane mandibles. Servo-pneumatic mechanical testing with cyclic application of 30–300 N at 3 Hz was conducted. Bite forces were 70% on the unresected and 30% on the resected side. Total number of cycles was set to 250,000. Testing was aborted in case of plate or screw failure. Axial load to failure was tested with a speed of 1 mm/s. Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc tests were used. Titanium, f-PEEK, and PEEK showed no failure in fatigue testing and PPSU (<i>p</i> < 0.001) failed against titanium, f-PEEK, PEEK, and PEKK. Titanium allowed the highest load to failure compared to f-PEEK (<i>p</i> = 0.049), PEEK (<i>p</i> = 0.008), PEKK (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and PPSU (<i>p</i> = 0.007). f-PEEK, PEEK, and PEKK withstood expected physiological bite force. Although titanium plates provided the highest fatigue strength, f-PEEK and PEEK plates showed no failure over 250,000 chewing cycles indicating sufficient mechanical strength for mandible reconstruction.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/12/3308reconstruction platesegmental mandibulectomypolymer platemechanical propertiespolyetheretherketonepolyetherketoneketone
spellingShingle Julian Lommen
Lara Schorn
Christoph Sproll
Norbert R. Kübler
Luis Fernando Nicolini
Ricarda Merfort
Ayimire Dilimulati
Frank Hildebrand
Majeed Rana
Johannes Greven
Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction
Journal of Clinical Medicine
reconstruction plate
segmental mandibulectomy
polymer plate
mechanical properties
polyetheretherketone
polyetherketoneketone
title Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction
title_full Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction
title_fullStr Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction
title_short Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction
title_sort mechanical fatigue performance of patient specific polymer plates in oncologic mandible reconstruction
topic reconstruction plate
segmental mandibulectomy
polymer plate
mechanical properties
polyetheretherketone
polyetherketoneketone
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/12/3308
work_keys_str_mv AT julianlommen mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction
AT laraschorn mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction
AT christophsproll mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction
AT norbertrkubler mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction
AT luisfernandonicolini mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction
AT ricardamerfort mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction
AT ayimiredilimulati mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction
AT frankhildebrand mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction
AT majeedrana mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction
AT johannesgreven mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction