Infection risk by oral contamination does not induce immune priming in the mealworm beetle (Tenebrio molitor) but triggers behavioral and physiological responses

In invertebrates, immune priming is the ability of individuals to enhance their immune response based on prior immunological experiences. This adaptive-like immunity likely evolved due to the risk of repeated infections by parasites in the host’s natural habitat. The expression of immune priming var...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandre Goerlinger, Charlène Develay, Aude Balourdet, Thierry Rigaud, Yannick Moret
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1354046/full
_version_ 1797321066686709760
author Alexandre Goerlinger
Charlène Develay
Aude Balourdet
Thierry Rigaud
Yannick Moret
author_facet Alexandre Goerlinger
Charlène Develay
Aude Balourdet
Thierry Rigaud
Yannick Moret
author_sort Alexandre Goerlinger
collection DOAJ
description In invertebrates, immune priming is the ability of individuals to enhance their immune response based on prior immunological experiences. This adaptive-like immunity likely evolved due to the risk of repeated infections by parasites in the host’s natural habitat. The expression of immune priming varies across host and pathogen species, as well as infection routes (oral or wounds), reflecting finely tuned evolutionary adjustments. Evidence from the mealworm beetle (Tenebrio molitor) suggests that Gram-positive bacterial pathogens play a significant role in immune priming after systemic infection. Despite the likelihood of oral infections by natural bacterial pathogens in T. molitor, it remains debated whether ingestion of contaminated food leads to systemic infection, and whether oral immune priming is possible is currently unknown. We first attempted to induce immune priming in both T. molitor larvae and adults by exposing them to food contaminated with living or dead Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. We found that oral ingestion of living bacteria did not kill them, but septic wounds caused rapid mortality. Intriguingly, the consumption of either dead or living bacteria did not protect against reinfection, contrasting with injury-induced priming. We further examined the effects of infecting food with various living bacterial pathogens on variables such as food consumption, mass gain, and feces production in larvae. We found that larvae exposed to Gram-positive bacteria in their food ingested less food, gained less mass and/or produced more feces than larvae exposed to contaminated food with Gram-negative bacteria or control food. This suggests that oral contamination with Gram-positive bacteria induced both behavioral responses and peristalsis defense mechanisms, even though no immune priming was observed here. Considering that the oral route of infection neither caused the death of the insects nor induced priming, we propose that immune priming in T. molitor may have primarily evolved as a response to the infection risk associated with wounds rather than oral ingestion.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:52:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fb3577d01a3f4d639c9203b01a8e810a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-3224
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T04:52:11Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj.art-fb3577d01a3f4d639c9203b01a8e810a2024-02-08T04:59:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242024-02-011510.3389/fimmu.2024.13540461354046Infection risk by oral contamination does not induce immune priming in the mealworm beetle (Tenebrio molitor) but triggers behavioral and physiological responsesAlexandre GoerlingerCharlène DevelayAude BalourdetThierry RigaudYannick MoretIn invertebrates, immune priming is the ability of individuals to enhance their immune response based on prior immunological experiences. This adaptive-like immunity likely evolved due to the risk of repeated infections by parasites in the host’s natural habitat. The expression of immune priming varies across host and pathogen species, as well as infection routes (oral or wounds), reflecting finely tuned evolutionary adjustments. Evidence from the mealworm beetle (Tenebrio molitor) suggests that Gram-positive bacterial pathogens play a significant role in immune priming after systemic infection. Despite the likelihood of oral infections by natural bacterial pathogens in T. molitor, it remains debated whether ingestion of contaminated food leads to systemic infection, and whether oral immune priming is possible is currently unknown. We first attempted to induce immune priming in both T. molitor larvae and adults by exposing them to food contaminated with living or dead Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. We found that oral ingestion of living bacteria did not kill them, but septic wounds caused rapid mortality. Intriguingly, the consumption of either dead or living bacteria did not protect against reinfection, contrasting with injury-induced priming. We further examined the effects of infecting food with various living bacterial pathogens on variables such as food consumption, mass gain, and feces production in larvae. We found that larvae exposed to Gram-positive bacteria in their food ingested less food, gained less mass and/or produced more feces than larvae exposed to contaminated food with Gram-negative bacteria or control food. This suggests that oral contamination with Gram-positive bacteria induced both behavioral responses and peristalsis defense mechanisms, even though no immune priming was observed here. Considering that the oral route of infection neither caused the death of the insects nor induced priming, we propose that immune priming in T. molitor may have primarily evolved as a response to the infection risk associated with wounds rather than oral ingestion.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1354046/fullTenebrio molitorevolution of immune primingoral infectionbehavioral defensegut immunityentomopathogen
spellingShingle Alexandre Goerlinger
Charlène Develay
Aude Balourdet
Thierry Rigaud
Yannick Moret
Infection risk by oral contamination does not induce immune priming in the mealworm beetle (Tenebrio molitor) but triggers behavioral and physiological responses
Frontiers in Immunology
Tenebrio molitor
evolution of immune priming
oral infection
behavioral defense
gut immunity
entomopathogen
title Infection risk by oral contamination does not induce immune priming in the mealworm beetle (Tenebrio molitor) but triggers behavioral and physiological responses
title_full Infection risk by oral contamination does not induce immune priming in the mealworm beetle (Tenebrio molitor) but triggers behavioral and physiological responses
title_fullStr Infection risk by oral contamination does not induce immune priming in the mealworm beetle (Tenebrio molitor) but triggers behavioral and physiological responses
title_full_unstemmed Infection risk by oral contamination does not induce immune priming in the mealworm beetle (Tenebrio molitor) but triggers behavioral and physiological responses
title_short Infection risk by oral contamination does not induce immune priming in the mealworm beetle (Tenebrio molitor) but triggers behavioral and physiological responses
title_sort infection risk by oral contamination does not induce immune priming in the mealworm beetle tenebrio molitor but triggers behavioral and physiological responses
topic Tenebrio molitor
evolution of immune priming
oral infection
behavioral defense
gut immunity
entomopathogen
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1354046/full
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandregoerlinger infectionriskbyoralcontaminationdoesnotinduceimmunepriminginthemealwormbeetletenebriomolitorbuttriggersbehavioralandphysiologicalresponses
AT charlenedevelay infectionriskbyoralcontaminationdoesnotinduceimmunepriminginthemealwormbeetletenebriomolitorbuttriggersbehavioralandphysiologicalresponses
AT audebalourdet infectionriskbyoralcontaminationdoesnotinduceimmunepriminginthemealwormbeetletenebriomolitorbuttriggersbehavioralandphysiologicalresponses
AT thierryrigaud infectionriskbyoralcontaminationdoesnotinduceimmunepriminginthemealwormbeetletenebriomolitorbuttriggersbehavioralandphysiologicalresponses
AT yannickmoret infectionriskbyoralcontaminationdoesnotinduceimmunepriminginthemealwormbeetletenebriomolitorbuttriggersbehavioralandphysiologicalresponses