Organizing for social sustainability: governance through bureaucratization in meta-organizations

The difficulties nation states face when attempting to use traditional legal means to cope with transnational phenomena such as environmental degradation, international labor conditions, and global trade have created an opportunity for the emergence of new types of regulations. These rules are often...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Åsa Casula Vifell, Renita Thedvall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2012-03-01
Series:Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://sspp.proquest.com/archives/vol8iss1/1008-036.thedvall.html
_version_ 1819204670469439488
author Åsa Casula Vifell
Renita Thedvall
author_facet Åsa Casula Vifell
Renita Thedvall
author_sort Åsa Casula Vifell
collection DOAJ
description The difficulties nation states face when attempting to use traditional legal means to cope with transnational phenomena such as environmental degradation, international labor conditions, and global trade have created an opportunity for the emergence of new types of regulations. These rules are often issued by organizations that produce voluntary measures such as standards and action plans to influence the behavior of individuals and institutions. These are in many cases meta-organizations that have other organizations rather than individuals as members. They are important links in the process of creating and diffusing dominant definitions in the “ideoscape” of influential policy concepts such as sustainable development. This article explores how two meta-organizations, Fairtrade International (FLO) and Organic Forum, shape the concepts of fair trade and organic food by providing ideas and content to the ideoscape of sustainable development. We argue that this process takes place by governance through bureaucratization in which fair trade and organic food become formalized, precisely defined, and made visible. This in turn determines how—or even if—the social dimension of sustainability can be made into policy. Furthermore, we find explanations in these processes as to why the social dimension of sustainability tends to be the most underdeveloped. We conclude that bureaucratization is also a form of politics, although not one that is as easily recognizable as an open power struggle.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T04:39:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fb3d389030364c27a8a9f0aaf072ccbf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1548-7733
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T04:39:30Z
publishDate 2012-03-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy
spelling doaj.art-fb3d389030364c27a8a9f0aaf072ccbf2022-12-21T17:59:49ZengTaylor & Francis GroupSustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy1548-77332012-03-01815058Organizing for social sustainability: governance through bureaucratization in meta-organizationsÅsa Casula VifellRenita ThedvallThe difficulties nation states face when attempting to use traditional legal means to cope with transnational phenomena such as environmental degradation, international labor conditions, and global trade have created an opportunity for the emergence of new types of regulations. These rules are often issued by organizations that produce voluntary measures such as standards and action plans to influence the behavior of individuals and institutions. These are in many cases meta-organizations that have other organizations rather than individuals as members. They are important links in the process of creating and diffusing dominant definitions in the “ideoscape” of influential policy concepts such as sustainable development. This article explores how two meta-organizations, Fairtrade International (FLO) and Organic Forum, shape the concepts of fair trade and organic food by providing ideas and content to the ideoscape of sustainable development. We argue that this process takes place by governance through bureaucratization in which fair trade and organic food become formalized, precisely defined, and made visible. This in turn determines how—or even if—the social dimension of sustainability can be made into policy. Furthermore, we find explanations in these processes as to why the social dimension of sustainability tends to be the most underdeveloped. We conclude that bureaucratization is also a form of politics, although not one that is as easily recognizable as an open power struggle.http://sspp.proquest.com/archives/vol8iss1/1008-036.thedvall.htmlsustainable developmentglobalizationstandardizationorganizationsfood industrybureaucracysocial conditions
spellingShingle Åsa Casula Vifell
Renita Thedvall
Organizing for social sustainability: governance through bureaucratization in meta-organizations
Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy
sustainable development
globalization
standardization
organizations
food industry
bureaucracy
social conditions
title Organizing for social sustainability: governance through bureaucratization in meta-organizations
title_full Organizing for social sustainability: governance through bureaucratization in meta-organizations
title_fullStr Organizing for social sustainability: governance through bureaucratization in meta-organizations
title_full_unstemmed Organizing for social sustainability: governance through bureaucratization in meta-organizations
title_short Organizing for social sustainability: governance through bureaucratization in meta-organizations
title_sort organizing for social sustainability governance through bureaucratization in meta organizations
topic sustainable development
globalization
standardization
organizations
food industry
bureaucracy
social conditions
url http://sspp.proquest.com/archives/vol8iss1/1008-036.thedvall.html
work_keys_str_mv AT asacasulavifell organizingforsocialsustainabilitygovernancethroughbureaucratizationinmetaorganizations
AT renitathedvall organizingforsocialsustainabilitygovernancethroughbureaucratizationinmetaorganizations