Voting under time pressure

In a controlled laboratory experiment we investigate whether time pressure influences voting decisions, and in particular the degree of strategic (insincere) voting. We find that participants under time constraints are more sincere when using the widely-employed Plurality Voting method. That is, tim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos Alós-Ferrer, Michele Garagnani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022-09-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500009335/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797701706241277952
author Carlos Alós-Ferrer
Michele Garagnani
author_facet Carlos Alós-Ferrer
Michele Garagnani
author_sort Carlos Alós-Ferrer
collection DOAJ
description In a controlled laboratory experiment we investigate whether time pressure influences voting decisions, and in particular the degree of strategic (insincere) voting. We find that participants under time constraints are more sincere when using the widely-employed Plurality Voting method. That is, time pressure might reduce strategic voting and hence misrepresentation of preferences. However, there are no effects for Approval Voting, in line with arguments that this method provides no incentives for strategic voting.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T04:39:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fb4a47837b224e388506db257b9c6c5e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T04:39:36Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-fb4a47837b224e388506db257b9c6c5e2023-09-03T09:45:59ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752022-09-01171072109310.1017/S1930297500009335Voting under time pressureCarlos Alós-FerrerMichele Garagnani0Zurich Center for Neuroeconomics (ZNE), Department of Economics, University of ZurichIn a controlled laboratory experiment we investigate whether time pressure influences voting decisions, and in particular the degree of strategic (insincere) voting. We find that participants under time constraints are more sincere when using the widely-employed Plurality Voting method. That is, time pressure might reduce strategic voting and hence misrepresentation of preferences. However, there are no effects for Approval Voting, in line with arguments that this method provides no incentives for strategic voting.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500009335/type/journal_articlevotingtime pressuresincerityapproval voting
spellingShingle Carlos Alós-Ferrer
Michele Garagnani
Voting under time pressure
Judgment and Decision Making
voting
time pressure
sincerity
approval voting
title Voting under time pressure
title_full Voting under time pressure
title_fullStr Voting under time pressure
title_full_unstemmed Voting under time pressure
title_short Voting under time pressure
title_sort voting under time pressure
topic voting
time pressure
sincerity
approval voting
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500009335/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT carlosalosferrer votingundertimepressure
AT michelegaragnani votingundertimepressure