Sustainable rural renewal in China: archetypical patterns

Against the backdrop of rural deprivation during the rapid urbanization of China since the end of the previous century, rural renewal has been regarded as a vital strategy for facilitating rural sustainability. Rural renewal in contemporary China involves activities that replan, consolidate, and red...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rongyu Wang, Klaus Eisenack, Rong Tan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2019-09-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol24/iss3/art32/
_version_ 1818571528328970240
author Rongyu Wang
Klaus Eisenack
Rong Tan
author_facet Rongyu Wang
Klaus Eisenack
Rong Tan
author_sort Rongyu Wang
collection DOAJ
description Against the backdrop of rural deprivation during the rapid urbanization of China since the end of the previous century, rural renewal has been regarded as a vital strategy for facilitating rural sustainability. Rural renewal in contemporary China involves activities that replan, consolidate, and redevelop the extant and idle rural construction land and then convert such land for alternative uses, including new rural settlement construction and rural industry development. However, given the regionally decentralized authoritarian (RDA) regime of China, i.e., a combination of political centralization and economic regional decentralization, the governance of rural renewal and its performance show great diversity. The objective of this study was to explore and elucidate the underlying patterns of sustainable rural renewal. Thus, from the social-ecological systems (SES) perspective, an archetype analysis was conducted based on primary data from 27 cases from the eastern, central, and western parts of China. In total, eight archetypical patterns were extracted, and the following three overarching implications were observed: (1) a governance system aligning with the attributes of rural land resources, the characteristics of actors, and the properties of interactions is essential for sustainable rural renewal; (2) decentralized or self-organized governance emerges to facilitate sustainable rural renewal; and (3) a long-term perspective of designing and enforcing rural renewal and distinctive land resource endowment contribute to rural sustainability. These findings may benefit China and other regions pursuing rural sustainability.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T13:57:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fb54902c187a40bab589bcdb542be374
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1708-3087
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T13:57:02Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Resilience Alliance
record_format Article
series Ecology and Society
spelling doaj.art-fb54902c187a40bab589bcdb542be3742022-12-21T22:58:49ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872019-09-012433210.5751/ES-11069-24033211069Sustainable rural renewal in China: archetypical patternsRongyu Wang0Klaus Eisenack1Rong Tan2School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaResource Economics Group, Humboldt-Universit&#228School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaAgainst the backdrop of rural deprivation during the rapid urbanization of China since the end of the previous century, rural renewal has been regarded as a vital strategy for facilitating rural sustainability. Rural renewal in contemporary China involves activities that replan, consolidate, and redevelop the extant and idle rural construction land and then convert such land for alternative uses, including new rural settlement construction and rural industry development. However, given the regionally decentralized authoritarian (RDA) regime of China, i.e., a combination of political centralization and economic regional decentralization, the governance of rural renewal and its performance show great diversity. The objective of this study was to explore and elucidate the underlying patterns of sustainable rural renewal. Thus, from the social-ecological systems (SES) perspective, an archetype analysis was conducted based on primary data from 27 cases from the eastern, central, and western parts of China. In total, eight archetypical patterns were extracted, and the following three overarching implications were observed: (1) a governance system aligning with the attributes of rural land resources, the characteristics of actors, and the properties of interactions is essential for sustainable rural renewal; (2) decentralized or self-organized governance emerges to facilitate sustainable rural renewal; and (3) a long-term perspective of designing and enforcing rural renewal and distinctive land resource endowment contribute to rural sustainability. These findings may benefit China and other regions pursuing rural sustainability.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol24/iss3/art32/archetypeschinarural renewalsocial-ecological systemssustainability
spellingShingle Rongyu Wang
Klaus Eisenack
Rong Tan
Sustainable rural renewal in China: archetypical patterns
Ecology and Society
archetypes
china
rural renewal
social-ecological systems
sustainability
title Sustainable rural renewal in China: archetypical patterns
title_full Sustainable rural renewal in China: archetypical patterns
title_fullStr Sustainable rural renewal in China: archetypical patterns
title_full_unstemmed Sustainable rural renewal in China: archetypical patterns
title_short Sustainable rural renewal in China: archetypical patterns
title_sort sustainable rural renewal in china archetypical patterns
topic archetypes
china
rural renewal
social-ecological systems
sustainability
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol24/iss3/art32/
work_keys_str_mv AT rongyuwang sustainableruralrenewalinchinaarchetypicalpatterns
AT klauseisenack sustainableruralrenewalinchinaarchetypicalpatterns
AT rongtan sustainableruralrenewalinchinaarchetypicalpatterns