COMPARATIVE GEOMETRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF HAND-HELD SCANNING SYSTEMS

An increasing number of hand-held scanning systems by different manufacturers are becoming available on the market. However, their geometrical performance is little-known to many users. Therefore the Laboratory for Photogrammetry & Laser Scanning of the HafenCity University Hamburg has carried...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. P. Kersten, H.-J. Przybilla, M. Lindstaedt, F. Tschirschwitz, M. Misgaiski-Hass
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-06-01
Series:The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Online Access:https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLI-B5/507/2016/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-507-2016.pdf
_version_ 1811221382063718400
author T. P. Kersten
H.-J. Przybilla
M. Lindstaedt
F. Tschirschwitz
M. Misgaiski-Hass
author_facet T. P. Kersten
H.-J. Przybilla
M. Lindstaedt
F. Tschirschwitz
M. Misgaiski-Hass
author_sort T. P. Kersten
collection DOAJ
description An increasing number of hand-held scanning systems by different manufacturers are becoming available on the market. However, their geometrical performance is little-known to many users. Therefore the Laboratory for Photogrammetry & Laser Scanning of the HafenCity University Hamburg has carried out geometrical accuracy tests with the following systems in co-operation with the Bochum University of Applied Sciences (Laboratory for Photogrammetry) as well as the Humboldt University in Berlin (Institute for Computer Science): DOTProduct DPI-7, Artec Spider, Mantis Vision F5 SR, Kinect v1 + v2, Structure Sensor and Google’s Project Tango. In the framework of these comparative investigations geometrically stable reference bodies were used. The appropriate reference data were acquired by measurement with two structured light projection systems (AICON smartSCAN and GOM ATOS I 2M). The comprehensive test results of the different test scenarios are presented and critically discussed in this contribution.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:58:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fb7405a61f59420989e0a3a2d7cea8c8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1682-1750
2194-9034
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:58:19Z
publishDate 2016-06-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
spelling doaj.art-fb7405a61f59420989e0a3a2d7cea8c82022-12-22T03:41:25ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences1682-17502194-90342016-06-01XLI-B550751410.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-507-2016COMPARATIVE GEOMETRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF HAND-HELD SCANNING SYSTEMST. P. Kersten0H.-J. Przybilla1M. Lindstaedt2F. Tschirschwitz3M. Misgaiski-Hass4HafenCity University Hamburg, Photogrammetry & Laser Scanning Lab, Überseeallee 16, D-20457 Hamburg, GermanyBochum University of Applied Sciences, Department of Geodesy, Lennershofstraße 140, D-44801 Bochum, GermanyHafenCity University Hamburg, Photogrammetry & Laser Scanning Lab, Überseeallee 16, D-20457 Hamburg, GermanyHafenCity University Hamburg, Photogrammetry & Laser Scanning Lab, Überseeallee 16, D-20457 Hamburg, GermanyHumboldt-University Berlin, Department of Computer Science, Rudower Chaussee 25, D-12489 Berlin-Adlershof, GermanyAn increasing number of hand-held scanning systems by different manufacturers are becoming available on the market. However, their geometrical performance is little-known to many users. Therefore the Laboratory for Photogrammetry & Laser Scanning of the HafenCity University Hamburg has carried out geometrical accuracy tests with the following systems in co-operation with the Bochum University of Applied Sciences (Laboratory for Photogrammetry) as well as the Humboldt University in Berlin (Institute for Computer Science): DOTProduct DPI-7, Artec Spider, Mantis Vision F5 SR, Kinect v1 + v2, Structure Sensor and Google’s Project Tango. In the framework of these comparative investigations geometrically stable reference bodies were used. The appropriate reference data were acquired by measurement with two structured light projection systems (AICON smartSCAN and GOM ATOS I 2M). The comprehensive test results of the different test scenarios are presented and critically discussed in this contribution.https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLI-B5/507/2016/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-507-2016.pdf
spellingShingle T. P. Kersten
H.-J. Przybilla
M. Lindstaedt
F. Tschirschwitz
M. Misgaiski-Hass
COMPARATIVE GEOMETRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF HAND-HELD SCANNING SYSTEMS
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
title COMPARATIVE GEOMETRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF HAND-HELD SCANNING SYSTEMS
title_full COMPARATIVE GEOMETRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF HAND-HELD SCANNING SYSTEMS
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE GEOMETRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF HAND-HELD SCANNING SYSTEMS
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE GEOMETRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF HAND-HELD SCANNING SYSTEMS
title_short COMPARATIVE GEOMETRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF HAND-HELD SCANNING SYSTEMS
title_sort comparative geometrical investigations of hand held scanning systems
url https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLI-B5/507/2016/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-507-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tpkersten comparativegeometricalinvestigationsofhandheldscanningsystems
AT hjprzybilla comparativegeometricalinvestigationsofhandheldscanningsystems
AT mlindstaedt comparativegeometricalinvestigationsofhandheldscanningsystems
AT ftschirschwitz comparativegeometricalinvestigationsofhandheldscanningsystems
AT mmisgaiskihass comparativegeometricalinvestigationsofhandheldscanningsystems