Age score for assessing motor function in Chinese older men

Background and objective: Motor performance plays an important role in daily activities for older adults. The purpose of the study was to construct a method for measuring physical fitness age that can be used to assess motor performance in elderly men and to verify its validity. Methods: Four it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao-Guang Zhao, Hui-Ming Huang, Yao-Dong Gu, Zhe-Xiao Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MRE Press 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Men's Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oss.jomh.org/jomh/article/20210108-170/pdf/37-43%20JOMH302.pdf
_version_ 1797328013458669568
author Xiao-Guang Zhao
Hui-Ming Huang
Yao-Dong Gu
Zhe-Xiao Zhou
author_facet Xiao-Guang Zhao
Hui-Ming Huang
Yao-Dong Gu
Zhe-Xiao Zhou
author_sort Xiao-Guang Zhao
collection DOAJ
description Background and objective: Motor performance plays an important role in daily activities for older adults. The purpose of the study was to construct a method for measuring physical fitness age that can be used to assess motor performance in elderly men and to verify its validity. Methods: Four items of physical fitness including grip strength, balancing on one leg with eyes open, 30 s chair stand test and 6 min walk test were selected and measured in a random order. Principal component analysis was employed to build physical fitness age based on motor performance variables from 94 elderly men with a mean age of 71.20 ± 5.05 years. Physical fitness age = 115.516-0.652 × grip strength - 0.142 × balancing on one leg with eyes open - 0.839 × 30 s chair stand - 0.061 × 6 min walk distance + 0.541 × chronological age. Results: Validation test from 13 men with exercise habit and 12 men without exercise habit showed that the physical fitness age in the exercised adults was significantly lower than its chronological age (63.91 ± 5.40 vs. 70.92 ± 4.17, P < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed between physical fitness age and chronological age in the elderly without exercise habits (71.23 ± 7.49 vs. 70.83 ± 5.19, P = 0.646). Conclusion: Physical fitness age is a valid indicator to evaluate and monitor motor performance. Participation in physical exercise may lower the physical fitness age by improving motor performance.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T06:45:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fb7b6075f79d4ca787feb12b0dd9aa9b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1875-6859
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T06:45:48Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher MRE Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Men's Health
spelling doaj.art-fb7b6075f79d4ca787feb12b0dd9aa9b2024-02-03T08:08:48ZengMRE PressJournal of Men's Health1875-68592021-01-01171374310.31083/jomh.v17i1.302S1875-6867(21)00294-3Age score for assessing motor function in Chinese older menXiao-Guang Zhao0Hui-Ming Huang1Yao-Dong Gu2Zhe-Xiao Zhou3Research Academy of Grand Health, Ningbo University, Zhejiang, P. R. ChinaResearch Academy of Grand Health, Ningbo University, Zhejiang, P. R. ChinaFaculty of Sport Science, Ningbo University, Zhejiang, P. R. ChinaFaculty of Sport Science, Ningbo University, Zhejiang, P. R. ChinaBackground and objective: Motor performance plays an important role in daily activities for older adults. The purpose of the study was to construct a method for measuring physical fitness age that can be used to assess motor performance in elderly men and to verify its validity. Methods: Four items of physical fitness including grip strength, balancing on one leg with eyes open, 30 s chair stand test and 6 min walk test were selected and measured in a random order. Principal component analysis was employed to build physical fitness age based on motor performance variables from 94 elderly men with a mean age of 71.20 ± 5.05 years. Physical fitness age = 115.516-0.652 × grip strength - 0.142 × balancing on one leg with eyes open - 0.839 × 30 s chair stand - 0.061 × 6 min walk distance + 0.541 × chronological age. Results: Validation test from 13 men with exercise habit and 12 men without exercise habit showed that the physical fitness age in the exercised adults was significantly lower than its chronological age (63.91 ± 5.40 vs. 70.92 ± 4.17, P < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed between physical fitness age and chronological age in the elderly without exercise habits (71.23 ± 7.49 vs. 70.83 ± 5.19, P = 0.646). Conclusion: Physical fitness age is a valid indicator to evaluate and monitor motor performance. Participation in physical exercise may lower the physical fitness age by improving motor performance.https://oss.jomh.org/jomh/article/20210108-170/pdf/37-43%20JOMH302.pdfagingphysical fitnessmotor functionexercise
spellingShingle Xiao-Guang Zhao
Hui-Ming Huang
Yao-Dong Gu
Zhe-Xiao Zhou
Age score for assessing motor function in Chinese older men
Journal of Men's Health
aging
physical fitness
motor function
exercise
title Age score for assessing motor function in Chinese older men
title_full Age score for assessing motor function in Chinese older men
title_fullStr Age score for assessing motor function in Chinese older men
title_full_unstemmed Age score for assessing motor function in Chinese older men
title_short Age score for assessing motor function in Chinese older men
title_sort age score for assessing motor function in chinese older men
topic aging
physical fitness
motor function
exercise
url https://oss.jomh.org/jomh/article/20210108-170/pdf/37-43%20JOMH302.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoguangzhao agescoreforassessingmotorfunctioninchineseoldermen
AT huiminghuang agescoreforassessingmotorfunctioninchineseoldermen
AT yaodonggu agescoreforassessingmotorfunctioninchineseoldermen
AT zhexiaozhou agescoreforassessingmotorfunctioninchineseoldermen