Reviewing Accuracy of First Trimester Screening for Preeclampsia Using Maternal Factors and Biomarkers

Sarah L Malone,1 Rani Haj Yahya,1 Stefan C Kane1,2 1Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, the Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; 2The University of Melbourne, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaCorrespondence: Sarah L Malone, Department of M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Malone SL, Haj Yahya R, Kane SC
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2022-09-01
Series:International Journal of Women's Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/reviewing-accuracy-of-first-trimester-screening-for-preeclampsia-using-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJWH
_version_ 1811272361766289408
author Malone SL
Haj Yahya R
Kane SC
author_facet Malone SL
Haj Yahya R
Kane SC
author_sort Malone SL
collection DOAJ
description Sarah L Malone,1 Rani Haj Yahya,1 Stefan C Kane1,2 1Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, the Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; 2The University of Melbourne, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaCorrespondence: Sarah L Malone, Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, the Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, Tel +61 3 8345 2000, Email Sarah.Malone@thewomens.org.auAbstract: Preeclampsia is a common and important complication of pregnancy, one with potentially significant morbidity and even mortality to both mother and baby. Identifying those at high risk of developing the condition is helpful as there is evidence that the incidence of preeclampsia can be reduced with low dose aspirin taken in pregnancy. Accurately predicting the risk of preeclampsia allows for more targeted aspirin prophylaxis and a greater opportunity for early detection of maternal and/or fetal complications associated with impaired placentation through a schedule of enhanced antenatal surveillance. Traditional preeclampsia prediction models use maternal characteristics and risk factors and have been shown to be of low predictive value. Multiparametric screening tests combine patient characteristics with serum biomarkers and ultrasound Doppler indices and have been shown to be more effective at detecting those at high risk of preeclampsia – more specifically, early-onset preeclampsia (onset of preeclampsia < 34 weeks’ gestation). Multiparametric screening has now been validated in different populations. The true cost effectiveness of a multiparametric screening model for preeclampsia screening is not yet fully known and will vary depending on the clinical setting. Despite the growing body of evidence for its improved detection rates, first trimester preeclampsia screening using multiparametric models is not widely implemented and is not part of the recommendations for antenatal screening from most international bodies. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics has advised universal preeclampsia screening using maternal risk factors and biomarkers and has strongly encouraged its promotion worldwide. Various barriers to implementation must be considered such as the immediate cost of equipment and training, the need for audit and quality control, and the expected benefit to the population. Low to middle income settings may require a pragmatic approach to the implementation of multiparametric screening given limited resources.Keywords: preeclampsia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, screening, first trimester, serum biomarkers, ultrasound
first_indexed 2024-04-12T22:37:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fb94005ba2fa4499a9574934a0fea65c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1179-1411
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T22:37:47Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series International Journal of Women's Health
spelling doaj.art-fb94005ba2fa4499a9574934a0fea65c2022-12-22T03:13:48ZengDove Medical PressInternational Journal of Women's Health1179-14112022-09-01Volume 141371138478328Reviewing Accuracy of First Trimester Screening for Preeclampsia Using Maternal Factors and BiomarkersMalone SLHaj Yahya RKane SCSarah L Malone,1 Rani Haj Yahya,1 Stefan C Kane1,2 1Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, the Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; 2The University of Melbourne, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaCorrespondence: Sarah L Malone, Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, the Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, Tel +61 3 8345 2000, Email Sarah.Malone@thewomens.org.auAbstract: Preeclampsia is a common and important complication of pregnancy, one with potentially significant morbidity and even mortality to both mother and baby. Identifying those at high risk of developing the condition is helpful as there is evidence that the incidence of preeclampsia can be reduced with low dose aspirin taken in pregnancy. Accurately predicting the risk of preeclampsia allows for more targeted aspirin prophylaxis and a greater opportunity for early detection of maternal and/or fetal complications associated with impaired placentation through a schedule of enhanced antenatal surveillance. Traditional preeclampsia prediction models use maternal characteristics and risk factors and have been shown to be of low predictive value. Multiparametric screening tests combine patient characteristics with serum biomarkers and ultrasound Doppler indices and have been shown to be more effective at detecting those at high risk of preeclampsia – more specifically, early-onset preeclampsia (onset of preeclampsia < 34 weeks’ gestation). Multiparametric screening has now been validated in different populations. The true cost effectiveness of a multiparametric screening model for preeclampsia screening is not yet fully known and will vary depending on the clinical setting. Despite the growing body of evidence for its improved detection rates, first trimester preeclampsia screening using multiparametric models is not widely implemented and is not part of the recommendations for antenatal screening from most international bodies. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics has advised universal preeclampsia screening using maternal risk factors and biomarkers and has strongly encouraged its promotion worldwide. Various barriers to implementation must be considered such as the immediate cost of equipment and training, the need for audit and quality control, and the expected benefit to the population. Low to middle income settings may require a pragmatic approach to the implementation of multiparametric screening given limited resources.Keywords: preeclampsia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, screening, first trimester, serum biomarkers, ultrasoundhttps://www.dovepress.com/reviewing-accuracy-of-first-trimester-screening-for-preeclampsia-using-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJWHpreeclampsiahypertensive disorders of pregnancyscreeningfirst trimesterserum biomarkersultrasound
spellingShingle Malone SL
Haj Yahya R
Kane SC
Reviewing Accuracy of First Trimester Screening for Preeclampsia Using Maternal Factors and Biomarkers
International Journal of Women's Health
preeclampsia
hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
screening
first trimester
serum biomarkers
ultrasound
title Reviewing Accuracy of First Trimester Screening for Preeclampsia Using Maternal Factors and Biomarkers
title_full Reviewing Accuracy of First Trimester Screening for Preeclampsia Using Maternal Factors and Biomarkers
title_fullStr Reviewing Accuracy of First Trimester Screening for Preeclampsia Using Maternal Factors and Biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Reviewing Accuracy of First Trimester Screening for Preeclampsia Using Maternal Factors and Biomarkers
title_short Reviewing Accuracy of First Trimester Screening for Preeclampsia Using Maternal Factors and Biomarkers
title_sort reviewing accuracy of first trimester screening for preeclampsia using maternal factors and biomarkers
topic preeclampsia
hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
screening
first trimester
serum biomarkers
ultrasound
url https://www.dovepress.com/reviewing-accuracy-of-first-trimester-screening-for-preeclampsia-using-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJWH
work_keys_str_mv AT malonesl reviewingaccuracyoffirsttrimesterscreeningforpreeclampsiausingmaternalfactorsandbiomarkers
AT hajyahyar reviewingaccuracyoffirsttrimesterscreeningforpreeclampsiausingmaternalfactorsandbiomarkers
AT kanesc reviewingaccuracyoffirsttrimesterscreeningforpreeclampsiausingmaternalfactorsandbiomarkers