Systematic review of statistical approaches to quantify, or correct for, measurement error in a continuous exposure in nutritional epidemiology
Abstract Background Several statistical approaches have been proposed to assess and correct for exposure measurement error. We aimed to provide a critical overview of the most common approaches used in nutritional epidemiology. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS and CINAHL were searched for reports pub...
Main Authors: | Derrick A. Bennett, Denise Landry, Julian Little, Cosetta Minelli |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0421-6 |
Similar Items
-
Systematic review of statistical approaches to quantify, or correct for, measurement error in a continuous exposure in nutritional epidemiology
by: Bennett, D, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Occupational epidemiologist's quest to tame measurement error in exposure
by: Igor Burstyn
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Study protocol: the empirical investigation of methods to correct for measurement error in biobanks with dietary assessment
by: Masson Lindsey F, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01) -
Some Progress on Quantum Error Correction for Discrete and Continuous Error Models
by: Jincao Li
Published: (2020-01-01) -
On the problem of non-zero word error rates for fixed-rate error correction codes in continuous variable quantum key distribution
by: Sarah J Johnson, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)