Does a linear position transducer placed on a stick and belt provide sufficient validity and reliability of countermovement jump performance outcomes?

Manufacturers recommend that linear position transducers (LPTs) should be placed on the side of a barbell (or wooden dowel) to measure countermovement jump (CMJ) height, but the validity and reliability of this placement have not been compared to other attachment sites. Since this recommended attach...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vladimír Hojka, Petr Šťastný, James J. Tufano, Dan Omcirk, Martin T. Janikov, Martin Komarc, Radim Jebavý
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Termedia Publishing House 2021-04-01
Series:Biology of Sport
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.termedia.pl/Does-a-linear-position-transducer-placed-on-a-stick-and-belt-r-nprovide-sufficient-validity-and-reliability-of-countermovement-r-njump-performance-outcomes-,78,43690,1,1.html
_version_ 1817998715776925696
author Vladimír Hojka
Petr Šťastný
James J. Tufano
Dan Omcirk
Martin T. Janikov
Martin Komarc
Radim Jebavý
author_facet Vladimír Hojka
Petr Šťastný
James J. Tufano
Dan Omcirk
Martin T. Janikov
Martin Komarc
Radim Jebavý
author_sort Vladimír Hojka
collection DOAJ
description Manufacturers recommend that linear position transducers (LPTs) should be placed on the side of a barbell (or wooden dowel) to measure countermovement jump (CMJ) height, but the validity and reliability of this placement have not been compared to other attachment sites. Since this recommended attachment site is far from the centre of mass, a belt attachment where the LPT is placed between the feet may increase the validity and reliability of CMJ data. Thirty-six physical education students participated in the study (24.6 ± 4.3 years; 177.0 ± 7.7 cm; 77.2 ± 9.0 kg). Parameters from the two LPT attachments (barbell and belt) were simultaneously validated to force plate data, where the nature of bias was analysed (systematic vs random). The within-session and between-session reliability of both attachment sites were compared to force plate data using a test-retest protocol of two sets of 5 CMJs separated by 7 days. The LPT provided highly reliable and valid measures of peak force, mean force, mean power, and jump height, where the bias was mostly systematic (r2 > 0.7; ICC > 0.9). Peak velocity, mean velocity, and peak power were in very good agreement with the force plate and were highly reliable (r2 > 0.5; ICC > 0.7). Therefore, both attachment sites produced similar results with a systematic bias compared to force plate data. Thus, both attachment sites seem to be valid for assessing CMJs when the measuring tool and site remain consistent across measurements. However, if LPT data are to be compared to force plate data, recalculation equations should be used.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T02:57:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fbaa00eb1f9f44518b7bdd31c0165d4d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0860-021X
2083-1862
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T02:57:35Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format Article
series Biology of Sport
spelling doaj.art-fbaa00eb1f9f44518b7bdd31c0165d4d2022-12-22T02:16:03ZengTermedia Publishing HouseBiology of Sport0860-021X2083-18622021-04-0139234134810.5114/biolsport.2022.10491843690Does a linear position transducer placed on a stick and belt provide sufficient validity and reliability of countermovement jump performance outcomes?Vladimír HojkaPetr ŠťastnýJames J. TufanoDan OmcirkMartin T. JanikovMartin KomarcRadim JebavýManufacturers recommend that linear position transducers (LPTs) should be placed on the side of a barbell (or wooden dowel) to measure countermovement jump (CMJ) height, but the validity and reliability of this placement have not been compared to other attachment sites. Since this recommended attachment site is far from the centre of mass, a belt attachment where the LPT is placed between the feet may increase the validity and reliability of CMJ data. Thirty-six physical education students participated in the study (24.6 ± 4.3 years; 177.0 ± 7.7 cm; 77.2 ± 9.0 kg). Parameters from the two LPT attachments (barbell and belt) were simultaneously validated to force plate data, where the nature of bias was analysed (systematic vs random). The within-session and between-session reliability of both attachment sites were compared to force plate data using a test-retest protocol of two sets of 5 CMJs separated by 7 days. The LPT provided highly reliable and valid measures of peak force, mean force, mean power, and jump height, where the bias was mostly systematic (r2 > 0.7; ICC > 0.9). Peak velocity, mean velocity, and peak power were in very good agreement with the force plate and were highly reliable (r2 > 0.5; ICC > 0.7). Therefore, both attachment sites produced similar results with a systematic bias compared to force plate data. Thus, both attachment sites seem to be valid for assessing CMJs when the measuring tool and site remain consistent across measurements. However, if LPT data are to be compared to force plate data, recalculation equations should be used.https://www.termedia.pl/Does-a-linear-position-transducer-placed-on-a-stick-and-belt-r-nprovide-sufficient-validity-and-reliability-of-countermovement-r-njump-performance-outcomes-,78,43690,1,1.htmllinear position transducer force plate explosive strength jump height power
spellingShingle Vladimír Hojka
Petr Šťastný
James J. Tufano
Dan Omcirk
Martin T. Janikov
Martin Komarc
Radim Jebavý
Does a linear position transducer placed on a stick and belt provide sufficient validity and reliability of countermovement jump performance outcomes?
Biology of Sport
linear position transducer
force plate
explosive strength
jump height
power
title Does a linear position transducer placed on a stick and belt provide sufficient validity and reliability of countermovement jump performance outcomes?
title_full Does a linear position transducer placed on a stick and belt provide sufficient validity and reliability of countermovement jump performance outcomes?
title_fullStr Does a linear position transducer placed on a stick and belt provide sufficient validity and reliability of countermovement jump performance outcomes?
title_full_unstemmed Does a linear position transducer placed on a stick and belt provide sufficient validity and reliability of countermovement jump performance outcomes?
title_short Does a linear position transducer placed on a stick and belt provide sufficient validity and reliability of countermovement jump performance outcomes?
title_sort does a linear position transducer placed on a stick and belt provide sufficient validity and reliability of countermovement jump performance outcomes
topic linear position transducer
force plate
explosive strength
jump height
power
url https://www.termedia.pl/Does-a-linear-position-transducer-placed-on-a-stick-and-belt-r-nprovide-sufficient-validity-and-reliability-of-countermovement-r-njump-performance-outcomes-,78,43690,1,1.html
work_keys_str_mv AT vladimirhojka doesalinearpositiontransducerplacedonastickandbeltprovidesufficientvalidityandreliabilityofcountermovementjumpperformanceoutcomes
AT petrstastny doesalinearpositiontransducerplacedonastickandbeltprovidesufficientvalidityandreliabilityofcountermovementjumpperformanceoutcomes
AT jamesjtufano doesalinearpositiontransducerplacedonastickandbeltprovidesufficientvalidityandreliabilityofcountermovementjumpperformanceoutcomes
AT danomcirk doesalinearpositiontransducerplacedonastickandbeltprovidesufficientvalidityandreliabilityofcountermovementjumpperformanceoutcomes
AT martintjanikov doesalinearpositiontransducerplacedonastickandbeltprovidesufficientvalidityandreliabilityofcountermovementjumpperformanceoutcomes
AT martinkomarc doesalinearpositiontransducerplacedonastickandbeltprovidesufficientvalidityandreliabilityofcountermovementjumpperformanceoutcomes
AT radimjebavy doesalinearpositiontransducerplacedonastickandbeltprovidesufficientvalidityandreliabilityofcountermovementjumpperformanceoutcomes