The Sense and Non-Sense of PEDs—Feeding Back Practical Experiences of Positive Energy District Demonstrators into the European PED Framework Definition Development Process

This article discusses early developments of the Positive Energy District (PED) concept, both in terms of its definition and of its implementation in real world demonstrators. Based on the specific challenges for creating an operational definition for the European +CityxChange project, the feasibili...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Han Vandevyvere, Dirk Ahlers, Annemie Wyckmans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4491
_version_ 1797487747699572736
author Han Vandevyvere
Dirk Ahlers
Annemie Wyckmans
author_facet Han Vandevyvere
Dirk Ahlers
Annemie Wyckmans
author_sort Han Vandevyvere
collection DOAJ
description This article discusses early developments of the Positive Energy District (PED) concept, both in terms of its definition and of its implementation in real world demonstrators. Based on the specific challenges for creating an operational definition for the European +CityxChange project, the feasibility of creating a PED was practically explored by identifying 4 possible subtypes that respond to varying constraints regarding the energy balance of the PED. This article provides the context and describes these 4 ambitions levels: PED<sub>autonomous</sub>, PED<sub>dynamic</sub>, PED<sub>virtual</sub>, and <sub>Pre</sub>PED; and the 3 boundary modes: geographical, functional, and virtual. The work thus expands on the first general PED definitions as they were put forward in the SET-plan and by the European Commission, while allowing a better response to the specific boundary conditions of PEDs’ physical context. As such, it provides an operational, city-focused, bottom-up PED definition. The present study analyses how these efforts connect to current work being performed on the development of a European PED Framework Definition. In the latter, new elements such as context factors are introduced in order to account for the varying boundary conditions that PEDs must address, and in particular the difficulties of realising PEDs in existing and densely built-up urban areas. Hereby it can be argued that the approach with 4 subtypes is a bottom-up method of addressing the same challenges as a context factor based approach operating in a top-down manner, this time starting from the regional or national renewable energy potentials. Both approaches indeed strive towards an optimum setup of PEDs both within their geographical boundaries and in their interactions with the surrounding energy infrastructures and cities. These efforts are instrumental in helping to prevent that a PED is being regarded as a goal in se, functionally disconnected from its surroundings. There are strong arguments in favour of handling PEDs as building blocks for the broader realisation of carbon neutral cities and regions, thus contributing to the systemic change that is needed to futureproof the built environment as a whole. Without applying this integrating perspective, PEDs risk creating a sub-optimal lock-in within their sites and thus remain one-off experiments, lacking connection to the wider urban sustainability strategies that are needed to properly address today’s energy and climate emergencies. This holds even more when considering the quality-related requirements that come with sustainable urban design and governance. Therefore, this study further explores how PEDs can fully support such a deep urban sustainability transition, and what could consequently be the next steps towards successful and upscaled PED deployment.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:52:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fbb415a5b7ab4e3e83cc420b250dea2b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:52:11Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-fbb415a5b7ab4e3e83cc420b250dea2b2023-11-23T16:32:07ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732022-06-011512449110.3390/en15124491The Sense and Non-Sense of PEDs—Feeding Back Practical Experiences of Positive Energy District Demonstrators into the European PED Framework Definition Development ProcessHan Vandevyvere0Dirk Ahlers1Annemie Wyckmans2Department of Architecture and Planning, NTNU—Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Architecture and Planning, NTNU—Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Architecture and Planning, NTNU—Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayThis article discusses early developments of the Positive Energy District (PED) concept, both in terms of its definition and of its implementation in real world demonstrators. Based on the specific challenges for creating an operational definition for the European +CityxChange project, the feasibility of creating a PED was practically explored by identifying 4 possible subtypes that respond to varying constraints regarding the energy balance of the PED. This article provides the context and describes these 4 ambitions levels: PED<sub>autonomous</sub>, PED<sub>dynamic</sub>, PED<sub>virtual</sub>, and <sub>Pre</sub>PED; and the 3 boundary modes: geographical, functional, and virtual. The work thus expands on the first general PED definitions as they were put forward in the SET-plan and by the European Commission, while allowing a better response to the specific boundary conditions of PEDs’ physical context. As such, it provides an operational, city-focused, bottom-up PED definition. The present study analyses how these efforts connect to current work being performed on the development of a European PED Framework Definition. In the latter, new elements such as context factors are introduced in order to account for the varying boundary conditions that PEDs must address, and in particular the difficulties of realising PEDs in existing and densely built-up urban areas. Hereby it can be argued that the approach with 4 subtypes is a bottom-up method of addressing the same challenges as a context factor based approach operating in a top-down manner, this time starting from the regional or national renewable energy potentials. Both approaches indeed strive towards an optimum setup of PEDs both within their geographical boundaries and in their interactions with the surrounding energy infrastructures and cities. These efforts are instrumental in helping to prevent that a PED is being regarded as a goal in se, functionally disconnected from its surroundings. There are strong arguments in favour of handling PEDs as building blocks for the broader realisation of carbon neutral cities and regions, thus contributing to the systemic change that is needed to futureproof the built environment as a whole. Without applying this integrating perspective, PEDs risk creating a sub-optimal lock-in within their sites and thus remain one-off experiments, lacking connection to the wider urban sustainability strategies that are needed to properly address today’s energy and climate emergencies. This holds even more when considering the quality-related requirements that come with sustainable urban design and governance. Therefore, this study further explores how PEDs can fully support such a deep urban sustainability transition, and what could consequently be the next steps towards successful and upscaled PED deployment.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4491positive energy districtspositive energy blocksPED conceptenergy transitionclimate neutralitysmart sustainable cities
spellingShingle Han Vandevyvere
Dirk Ahlers
Annemie Wyckmans
The Sense and Non-Sense of PEDs—Feeding Back Practical Experiences of Positive Energy District Demonstrators into the European PED Framework Definition Development Process
Energies
positive energy districts
positive energy blocks
PED concept
energy transition
climate neutrality
smart sustainable cities
title The Sense and Non-Sense of PEDs—Feeding Back Practical Experiences of Positive Energy District Demonstrators into the European PED Framework Definition Development Process
title_full The Sense and Non-Sense of PEDs—Feeding Back Practical Experiences of Positive Energy District Demonstrators into the European PED Framework Definition Development Process
title_fullStr The Sense and Non-Sense of PEDs—Feeding Back Practical Experiences of Positive Energy District Demonstrators into the European PED Framework Definition Development Process
title_full_unstemmed The Sense and Non-Sense of PEDs—Feeding Back Practical Experiences of Positive Energy District Demonstrators into the European PED Framework Definition Development Process
title_short The Sense and Non-Sense of PEDs—Feeding Back Practical Experiences of Positive Energy District Demonstrators into the European PED Framework Definition Development Process
title_sort sense and non sense of peds feeding back practical experiences of positive energy district demonstrators into the european ped framework definition development process
topic positive energy districts
positive energy blocks
PED concept
energy transition
climate neutrality
smart sustainable cities
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4491
work_keys_str_mv AT hanvandevyvere thesenseandnonsenseofpedsfeedingbackpracticalexperiencesofpositiveenergydistrictdemonstratorsintotheeuropeanpedframeworkdefinitiondevelopmentprocess
AT dirkahlers thesenseandnonsenseofpedsfeedingbackpracticalexperiencesofpositiveenergydistrictdemonstratorsintotheeuropeanpedframeworkdefinitiondevelopmentprocess
AT annemiewyckmans thesenseandnonsenseofpedsfeedingbackpracticalexperiencesofpositiveenergydistrictdemonstratorsintotheeuropeanpedframeworkdefinitiondevelopmentprocess
AT hanvandevyvere senseandnonsenseofpedsfeedingbackpracticalexperiencesofpositiveenergydistrictdemonstratorsintotheeuropeanpedframeworkdefinitiondevelopmentprocess
AT dirkahlers senseandnonsenseofpedsfeedingbackpracticalexperiencesofpositiveenergydistrictdemonstratorsintotheeuropeanpedframeworkdefinitiondevelopmentprocess
AT annemiewyckmans senseandnonsenseofpedsfeedingbackpracticalexperiencesofpositiveenergydistrictdemonstratorsintotheeuropeanpedframeworkdefinitiondevelopmentprocess