Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft

Background: Posterior glenohumeral instability is much less common than anterior instability, and there is a paucity of studies looking at glenoid bone loss as it relates to posterior instability. However, while the data are not as robust, posterior glenoid bone loss can lead to recurrent instabilit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert S. Dean MD, Eric J. Dennis MD, LeeAnne F. Torres MD, Danielle E. Rider BA, Nicholas A. Trasolini MD, Max D. Gehrman MD, Brian R. Waterman MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-05-01
Series:Video Journal of Sports Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254221086294
_version_ 1818491178381737984
author Robert S. Dean MD
Eric J. Dennis MD
LeeAnne F. Torres MD
Danielle E. Rider BA
Nicholas A. Trasolini MD
Max D. Gehrman MD
Brian R. Waterman MD
author_facet Robert S. Dean MD
Eric J. Dennis MD
LeeAnne F. Torres MD
Danielle E. Rider BA
Nicholas A. Trasolini MD
Max D. Gehrman MD
Brian R. Waterman MD
author_sort Robert S. Dean MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Posterior glenohumeral instability is much less common than anterior instability, and there is a paucity of studies looking at glenoid bone loss as it relates to posterior instability. However, while the data are not as robust, posterior glenoid bone loss can lead to recurrent instability and failed soft tissue procedures. Arthroscopic posterior glenoid augmentation with distal tibial allograft (DTA) is a minimally invasive option to restore stability and preserve function. Indications: The primary indication for posterior glenoid augmentation is posterior instability with >20% to 25% posterior glenoid bone loss or recurrent posterior instability after prior stabilization procedure. In this case, the patient is a 21-year-old man with recurrent instability after 2 prior soft tissue stabilization procedures. Technique Description: The patient was positioned in lateral decubitus, and portals were established. Arthroscopic evaluation was performed to assess the labrum, biceps, rotator cuff, glenoid, and humeral head. Glenoid mobilization was performed, and an incision was made for introduction of the bone block. The glenoid was prepared, and a trial was used to guide preparation of the graft, which was harvested from the articular cartilage of the distal tibia. The graft was irrigated and bathed in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and then introduced and positioned for maximal coverage of the defect. Screw fixation was performed with two 3.75-mm screws. The posterior capsule was reapproximated, and a layered closure was performed. Results: Previous studies have reported significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes, high rates of healing, and no cases of recurrent instability after DTA for anterior glenoid bone loss. Additional studies have reported few patients with recurrent instability and no instances of partial or non-union. Significant loss of range of motion has not been reported in the most recent case series. One previous study reported significantly improved patient-reported outcomes and near-complete osseous reabsorption with DTA after failed Latarjet procedure. Discussion/Conclusion: Arthroscopic posterior glenoid augmentation with DTA is a viable treatment option for patients with shoulder pain and instability with >20% to 25% posterior glenoid bone loss and/or following prior stabilization procedures.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T17:27:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fbbce2540a0a45e48a07c61f52d1e984
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2635-0254
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T17:27:17Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Video Journal of Sports Medicine
spelling doaj.art-fbbce2540a0a45e48a07c61f52d1e9842022-12-22T01:39:49ZengSAGE PublishingVideo Journal of Sports Medicine2635-02542022-05-01210.1177/26350254221086294Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial AllograftRobert S. Dean MD0Eric J. Dennis MD1LeeAnne F. Torres MD2Danielle E. Rider BA3Nicholas A. Trasolini MD4Max D. Gehrman MD5Brian R. Waterman MD6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USAWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USADivision of Sports Medicine, Wake Forest University Athletics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USABackground: Posterior glenohumeral instability is much less common than anterior instability, and there is a paucity of studies looking at glenoid bone loss as it relates to posterior instability. However, while the data are not as robust, posterior glenoid bone loss can lead to recurrent instability and failed soft tissue procedures. Arthroscopic posterior glenoid augmentation with distal tibial allograft (DTA) is a minimally invasive option to restore stability and preserve function. Indications: The primary indication for posterior glenoid augmentation is posterior instability with >20% to 25% posterior glenoid bone loss or recurrent posterior instability after prior stabilization procedure. In this case, the patient is a 21-year-old man with recurrent instability after 2 prior soft tissue stabilization procedures. Technique Description: The patient was positioned in lateral decubitus, and portals were established. Arthroscopic evaluation was performed to assess the labrum, biceps, rotator cuff, glenoid, and humeral head. Glenoid mobilization was performed, and an incision was made for introduction of the bone block. The glenoid was prepared, and a trial was used to guide preparation of the graft, which was harvested from the articular cartilage of the distal tibia. The graft was irrigated and bathed in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and then introduced and positioned for maximal coverage of the defect. Screw fixation was performed with two 3.75-mm screws. The posterior capsule was reapproximated, and a layered closure was performed. Results: Previous studies have reported significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes, high rates of healing, and no cases of recurrent instability after DTA for anterior glenoid bone loss. Additional studies have reported few patients with recurrent instability and no instances of partial or non-union. Significant loss of range of motion has not been reported in the most recent case series. One previous study reported significantly improved patient-reported outcomes and near-complete osseous reabsorption with DTA after failed Latarjet procedure. Discussion/Conclusion: Arthroscopic posterior glenoid augmentation with DTA is a viable treatment option for patients with shoulder pain and instability with >20% to 25% posterior glenoid bone loss and/or following prior stabilization procedures.https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254221086294
spellingShingle Robert S. Dean MD
Eric J. Dennis MD
LeeAnne F. Torres MD
Danielle E. Rider BA
Nicholas A. Trasolini MD
Max D. Gehrman MD
Brian R. Waterman MD
Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft
Video Journal of Sports Medicine
title Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft
title_full Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft
title_fullStr Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft
title_short Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft
title_sort arthroscopic posterior glenoid augmentation with distal tibial allograft
url https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254221086294
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsdeanmd arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft
AT ericjdennismd arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft
AT leeanneftorresmd arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft
AT danielleeriderba arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft
AT nicholasatrasolinimd arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft
AT maxdgehrmanmd arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft
AT brianrwatermanmd arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft