Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft
Background: Posterior glenohumeral instability is much less common than anterior instability, and there is a paucity of studies looking at glenoid bone loss as it relates to posterior instability. However, while the data are not as robust, posterior glenoid bone loss can lead to recurrent instabilit...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2022-05-01
|
Series: | Video Journal of Sports Medicine |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254221086294 |
_version_ | 1818491178381737984 |
---|---|
author | Robert S. Dean MD Eric J. Dennis MD LeeAnne F. Torres MD Danielle E. Rider BA Nicholas A. Trasolini MD Max D. Gehrman MD Brian R. Waterman MD |
author_facet | Robert S. Dean MD Eric J. Dennis MD LeeAnne F. Torres MD Danielle E. Rider BA Nicholas A. Trasolini MD Max D. Gehrman MD Brian R. Waterman MD |
author_sort | Robert S. Dean MD |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Posterior glenohumeral instability is much less common than anterior instability, and there is a paucity of studies looking at glenoid bone loss as it relates to posterior instability. However, while the data are not as robust, posterior glenoid bone loss can lead to recurrent instability and failed soft tissue procedures. Arthroscopic posterior glenoid augmentation with distal tibial allograft (DTA) is a minimally invasive option to restore stability and preserve function. Indications: The primary indication for posterior glenoid augmentation is posterior instability with >20% to 25% posterior glenoid bone loss or recurrent posterior instability after prior stabilization procedure. In this case, the patient is a 21-year-old man with recurrent instability after 2 prior soft tissue stabilization procedures. Technique Description: The patient was positioned in lateral decubitus, and portals were established. Arthroscopic evaluation was performed to assess the labrum, biceps, rotator cuff, glenoid, and humeral head. Glenoid mobilization was performed, and an incision was made for introduction of the bone block. The glenoid was prepared, and a trial was used to guide preparation of the graft, which was harvested from the articular cartilage of the distal tibia. The graft was irrigated and bathed in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and then introduced and positioned for maximal coverage of the defect. Screw fixation was performed with two 3.75-mm screws. The posterior capsule was reapproximated, and a layered closure was performed. Results: Previous studies have reported significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes, high rates of healing, and no cases of recurrent instability after DTA for anterior glenoid bone loss. Additional studies have reported few patients with recurrent instability and no instances of partial or non-union. Significant loss of range of motion has not been reported in the most recent case series. One previous study reported significantly improved patient-reported outcomes and near-complete osseous reabsorption with DTA after failed Latarjet procedure. Discussion/Conclusion: Arthroscopic posterior glenoid augmentation with DTA is a viable treatment option for patients with shoulder pain and instability with >20% to 25% posterior glenoid bone loss and/or following prior stabilization procedures. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T17:27:17Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-fbbce2540a0a45e48a07c61f52d1e984 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2635-0254 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T17:27:17Z |
publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
publisher | SAGE Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | Video Journal of Sports Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-fbbce2540a0a45e48a07c61f52d1e9842022-12-22T01:39:49ZengSAGE PublishingVideo Journal of Sports Medicine2635-02542022-05-01210.1177/26350254221086294Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial AllograftRobert S. Dean MD0Eric J. Dennis MD1LeeAnne F. Torres MD2Danielle E. Rider BA3Nicholas A. Trasolini MD4Max D. Gehrman MD5Brian R. Waterman MD6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USAWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USADivision of Sports Medicine, Wake Forest University Athletics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USABackground: Posterior glenohumeral instability is much less common than anterior instability, and there is a paucity of studies looking at glenoid bone loss as it relates to posterior instability. However, while the data are not as robust, posterior glenoid bone loss can lead to recurrent instability and failed soft tissue procedures. Arthroscopic posterior glenoid augmentation with distal tibial allograft (DTA) is a minimally invasive option to restore stability and preserve function. Indications: The primary indication for posterior glenoid augmentation is posterior instability with >20% to 25% posterior glenoid bone loss or recurrent posterior instability after prior stabilization procedure. In this case, the patient is a 21-year-old man with recurrent instability after 2 prior soft tissue stabilization procedures. Technique Description: The patient was positioned in lateral decubitus, and portals were established. Arthroscopic evaluation was performed to assess the labrum, biceps, rotator cuff, glenoid, and humeral head. Glenoid mobilization was performed, and an incision was made for introduction of the bone block. The glenoid was prepared, and a trial was used to guide preparation of the graft, which was harvested from the articular cartilage of the distal tibia. The graft was irrigated and bathed in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and then introduced and positioned for maximal coverage of the defect. Screw fixation was performed with two 3.75-mm screws. The posterior capsule was reapproximated, and a layered closure was performed. Results: Previous studies have reported significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes, high rates of healing, and no cases of recurrent instability after DTA for anterior glenoid bone loss. Additional studies have reported few patients with recurrent instability and no instances of partial or non-union. Significant loss of range of motion has not been reported in the most recent case series. One previous study reported significantly improved patient-reported outcomes and near-complete osseous reabsorption with DTA after failed Latarjet procedure. Discussion/Conclusion: Arthroscopic posterior glenoid augmentation with DTA is a viable treatment option for patients with shoulder pain and instability with >20% to 25% posterior glenoid bone loss and/or following prior stabilization procedures.https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254221086294 |
spellingShingle | Robert S. Dean MD Eric J. Dennis MD LeeAnne F. Torres MD Danielle E. Rider BA Nicholas A. Trasolini MD Max D. Gehrman MD Brian R. Waterman MD Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft Video Journal of Sports Medicine |
title | Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft |
title_full | Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft |
title_fullStr | Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft |
title_full_unstemmed | Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft |
title_short | Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Augmentation With Distal Tibial Allograft |
title_sort | arthroscopic posterior glenoid augmentation with distal tibial allograft |
url | https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254221086294 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsdeanmd arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft AT ericjdennismd arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft AT leeanneftorresmd arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft AT danielleeriderba arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft AT nicholasatrasolinimd arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft AT maxdgehrmanmd arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft AT brianrwatermanmd arthroscopicposteriorglenoidaugmentationwithdistaltibialallograft |