Single‐dose NEPA versus an aprepitant regimen for prevention of chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy
Abstract Introduction Non‐inferiority of NEPA (fixed combination of NK1 receptor antagonist (RA), netupitant, and 5‐HT3RA, palonosetron) versus an aprepitant regimen was previously shown in a pragmatic study in patients receiving anthracycline cyclophosphamide (AC) and non‐AC moderately emetogenic c...
Main Authors: | Laurent Zelek, Rudolph Navari, Matti Aapro, Florian Scotté |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2023-08-01
|
Series: | Cancer Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6121 |
Similar Items
-
Efficacy of NEPA, a fixed antiemetic combination of netupitant and palonosetron, vs a 3‐day aprepitant regimen for prevention of chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in Chinese patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) in a randomized Phase 3 study
by: Jianhua Chang, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Identification of optimal contemporary antiemetic prophylaxis for doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in Chinese cancer patients: post-hoc analysis of 3 prospective studies
by: Winnie Yeo, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Fixed combination of oral NEPA (netupitant‐palonosetron) for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy: Efficacy data from 2 randomized, double‐blind phase III studies
by: Lee Schwartzberg, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01) -
Management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting by risk profile: role of netupitant/palonosetron
by: Lorusso V
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Efficacy of the combination use of aprepitant and palonosetron for improving nausea in various moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens
by: Naohisa Yoshida, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)