Damage evolution of rock-encased-backfill structure under stepwise cyclic triaxial loading

Rock-encased-backfill (RB) structures are common in underground mining, for example in the cut-and-fill and stoping methods. To understand the effects of cyclic excavation and blasting activities on the damage of these RB structures, a series of triaxial stepwise-increasing-amplitude cyclic loading...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xin Yu, Yuye Tan, Weidong Song, John Kemeny, Shengwen Qi, Bowen Zheng, Songfeng Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-02-01
Series:Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167477552300358X
_version_ 1797322461068394496
author Xin Yu
Yuye Tan
Weidong Song
John Kemeny
Shengwen Qi
Bowen Zheng
Songfeng Guo
author_facet Xin Yu
Yuye Tan
Weidong Song
John Kemeny
Shengwen Qi
Bowen Zheng
Songfeng Guo
author_sort Xin Yu
collection DOAJ
description Rock-encased-backfill (RB) structures are common in underground mining, for example in the cut-and-fill and stoping methods. To understand the effects of cyclic excavation and blasting activities on the damage of these RB structures, a series of triaxial stepwise-increasing-amplitude cyclic loading experiments was conducted with cylindrical RB specimens (rock on outside, backfill on inside) with different volume fractions of rock (VF = 0.48, 0.61, 0.73, and 0.84), confining pressures (0, 6, 9, and 12 MPa), and cyclic loading rates (200, 300, 400, and 500 N/s). The damage evolution and meso-crack formation during the cyclic tests were analyzed with results from stress-strain hysteresis loops, acoustic emission events, and post-failure X-ray 3D fracture morphology. The results showed significant differences between cyclic and monotonic loadings of RB specimens, particularly with regard to the generation of shear microcracks, the development of stress memory and strain hardening, and the contact forces and associated friction that develops along the rock-backfill interface. One important finding is that as a function of the number of cycles, the elastic strain increases linearly and the dissipated energy increases exponentially. Also, compared with monotonic loading, the cyclic strain hardening characteristics are more sensitive to rising confining pressures during the initial compaction stage. Another finding is that compared with monotonic loading, more shear microcracks are generated during every reloading stage, but these microcracks tend to be dispersed and lessen the likelihood of large shear fracture formation. The transition from elastic to plastic behavior varies depending on the parameters of each test (confinement, volume fraction, and cyclic rate), and an interesting finding was that the transformation to plastic behavior is significantly lower under the conditions of 0.73 rock volume fraction, 400 N/s cyclic loading rate, and 9 MPa confinement. All the findings have important practical implications on the ability of backfill to support underground excavations.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T05:14:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fbdb533cb8004418905e20eb5be60f16
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1674-7755
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T05:14:40Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
spelling doaj.art-fbdb533cb8004418905e20eb5be60f162024-02-07T04:44:22ZengElsevierJournal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering1674-77552024-02-01162597615Damage evolution of rock-encased-backfill structure under stepwise cyclic triaxial loadingXin Yu0Yuye Tan1Weidong Song2John Kemeny3Shengwen Qi4Bowen Zheng5Songfeng Guo6Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100089, China; Innovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100089, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China; Key Laboratory of High-Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines (Ministry of Education of China), University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China; Department of Mining and Geological Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 86721, USASchool of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China; Key Laboratory of High-Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines (Ministry of Education of China), University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China; Corresponding author. School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China; Key Laboratory of High-Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines (Ministry of Education of China), University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, ChinaDepartment of Mining and Geological Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 86721, USA; Corresponding author.Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100089, China; Innovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100089, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, ChinaKey Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100089, China; Innovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100089, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, ChinaKey Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100089, China; Innovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100089, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, ChinaRock-encased-backfill (RB) structures are common in underground mining, for example in the cut-and-fill and stoping methods. To understand the effects of cyclic excavation and blasting activities on the damage of these RB structures, a series of triaxial stepwise-increasing-amplitude cyclic loading experiments was conducted with cylindrical RB specimens (rock on outside, backfill on inside) with different volume fractions of rock (VF = 0.48, 0.61, 0.73, and 0.84), confining pressures (0, 6, 9, and 12 MPa), and cyclic loading rates (200, 300, 400, and 500 N/s). The damage evolution and meso-crack formation during the cyclic tests were analyzed with results from stress-strain hysteresis loops, acoustic emission events, and post-failure X-ray 3D fracture morphology. The results showed significant differences between cyclic and monotonic loadings of RB specimens, particularly with regard to the generation of shear microcracks, the development of stress memory and strain hardening, and the contact forces and associated friction that develops along the rock-backfill interface. One important finding is that as a function of the number of cycles, the elastic strain increases linearly and the dissipated energy increases exponentially. Also, compared with monotonic loading, the cyclic strain hardening characteristics are more sensitive to rising confining pressures during the initial compaction stage. Another finding is that compared with monotonic loading, more shear microcracks are generated during every reloading stage, but these microcracks tend to be dispersed and lessen the likelihood of large shear fracture formation. The transition from elastic to plastic behavior varies depending on the parameters of each test (confinement, volume fraction, and cyclic rate), and an interesting finding was that the transformation to plastic behavior is significantly lower under the conditions of 0.73 rock volume fraction, 400 N/s cyclic loading rate, and 9 MPa confinement. All the findings have important practical implications on the ability of backfill to support underground excavations.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167477552300358XRock and backfillTriaxial cyclic loadingVolume fractionDamage evolution3D visualization
spellingShingle Xin Yu
Yuye Tan
Weidong Song
John Kemeny
Shengwen Qi
Bowen Zheng
Songfeng Guo
Damage evolution of rock-encased-backfill structure under stepwise cyclic triaxial loading
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Rock and backfill
Triaxial cyclic loading
Volume fraction
Damage evolution
3D visualization
title Damage evolution of rock-encased-backfill structure under stepwise cyclic triaxial loading
title_full Damage evolution of rock-encased-backfill structure under stepwise cyclic triaxial loading
title_fullStr Damage evolution of rock-encased-backfill structure under stepwise cyclic triaxial loading
title_full_unstemmed Damage evolution of rock-encased-backfill structure under stepwise cyclic triaxial loading
title_short Damage evolution of rock-encased-backfill structure under stepwise cyclic triaxial loading
title_sort damage evolution of rock encased backfill structure under stepwise cyclic triaxial loading
topic Rock and backfill
Triaxial cyclic loading
Volume fraction
Damage evolution
3D visualization
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167477552300358X
work_keys_str_mv AT xinyu damageevolutionofrockencasedbackfillstructureunderstepwisecyclictriaxialloading
AT yuyetan damageevolutionofrockencasedbackfillstructureunderstepwisecyclictriaxialloading
AT weidongsong damageevolutionofrockencasedbackfillstructureunderstepwisecyclictriaxialloading
AT johnkemeny damageevolutionofrockencasedbackfillstructureunderstepwisecyclictriaxialloading
AT shengwenqi damageevolutionofrockencasedbackfillstructureunderstepwisecyclictriaxialloading
AT bowenzheng damageevolutionofrockencasedbackfillstructureunderstepwisecyclictriaxialloading
AT songfengguo damageevolutionofrockencasedbackfillstructureunderstepwisecyclictriaxialloading