Measuring pulmonary arterial compliance: mission impossible? Insights from a novel in vivo continuous-flow based experimental model

Arterial compliance (C) is related to the elasticity, size, and geometrical distribution of arteries. Compliance is a determinant of the load that impedes ventricular ejection. Measuring compliance is difficult, particularly in the pulmonary circulation in which resistive and compliant vessels overl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frédéric Vanden Eynden, Thierry Bové, Marie-Luce Chirade, Guido Van Nooten, Patrick Segers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-05-01
Series:Pulmonary Circulation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2045894018776882
_version_ 1811223684859297792
author Frédéric Vanden Eynden
Thierry Bové
Marie-Luce Chirade
Guido Van Nooten
Patrick Segers
author_facet Frédéric Vanden Eynden
Thierry Bové
Marie-Luce Chirade
Guido Van Nooten
Patrick Segers
author_sort Frédéric Vanden Eynden
collection DOAJ
description Arterial compliance (C) is related to the elasticity, size, and geometrical distribution of arteries. Compliance is a determinant of the load that impedes ventricular ejection. Measuring compliance is difficult, particularly in the pulmonary circulation in which resistive and compliant vessels overlap. Comparing different methods for quantification of compliance to a method that involves a continuous flow might help to identify the optimal method. Pulmonary arterial compliance was computed in six pigs based on the stroke volume to pulse pressure ratio, diastolic decay exponential fitting, area method, and the pulse pressure method (PPM). Compliance measurements were compared to those obtained under continuous flow conditions through a right ventricular bypass (Heartware Inc., Miami Lakes, FL, USA). Compliance was computed for various flows using diastolic decay exponential fitting after an abrupt interruption of the pump. Under the continuous flow conditions, resistance (R) was a decreasing function of the flow, and the fitting to P = e -t/RC yielded a pulmonary time constant (RC) of 2.06 s ( ± 0.48). Compliance was an increasing function of flow. Steady flow inter-method comparisons of compliance under pulsatile flow conditions showed large discrepancies and values (7.23 ± 4.47 mL/mmHg) which were lower than those obtained under continuous flow conditions (10.19 ± 1 0.31 mL/mmHg). Best agreement with steady flow measurements is obtained with the diastolic decay method. Resistance and compliance are both flow-dependent and are inversely related in the pulmonary circulation. The dynamic nature of the pulsatile flow may induce a non-uniformly distributed compliance, with an influence on the methods of measurement.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T08:36:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fbde6ba389f14acc95f195ca4886648d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-8940
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T08:36:55Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pulmonary Circulation
spelling doaj.art-fbde6ba389f14acc95f195ca4886648d2022-12-22T03:39:59ZengWileyPulmonary Circulation2045-89402018-05-01810.1177/2045894018776882Measuring pulmonary arterial compliance: mission impossible? Insights from a novel in vivo continuous-flow based experimental modelFrédéric Vanden Eynden0Thierry Bové1Marie-Luce Chirade2Guido Van Nooten3Patrick Segers4Laboratory of Experimental Cardiac Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, BelgiumLaboratory of Experimental Cardiac Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, BelgiumCardiac Surgery, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Académique Erasme, Brussels, BelgiumLaboratory of Experimental Cardiac Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, BelgiumIBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, BelgiumArterial compliance (C) is related to the elasticity, size, and geometrical distribution of arteries. Compliance is a determinant of the load that impedes ventricular ejection. Measuring compliance is difficult, particularly in the pulmonary circulation in which resistive and compliant vessels overlap. Comparing different methods for quantification of compliance to a method that involves a continuous flow might help to identify the optimal method. Pulmonary arterial compliance was computed in six pigs based on the stroke volume to pulse pressure ratio, diastolic decay exponential fitting, area method, and the pulse pressure method (PPM). Compliance measurements were compared to those obtained under continuous flow conditions through a right ventricular bypass (Heartware Inc., Miami Lakes, FL, USA). Compliance was computed for various flows using diastolic decay exponential fitting after an abrupt interruption of the pump. Under the continuous flow conditions, resistance (R) was a decreasing function of the flow, and the fitting to P = e -t/RC yielded a pulmonary time constant (RC) of 2.06 s ( ± 0.48). Compliance was an increasing function of flow. Steady flow inter-method comparisons of compliance under pulsatile flow conditions showed large discrepancies and values (7.23 ± 4.47 mL/mmHg) which were lower than those obtained under continuous flow conditions (10.19 ± 1 0.31 mL/mmHg). Best agreement with steady flow measurements is obtained with the diastolic decay method. Resistance and compliance are both flow-dependent and are inversely related in the pulmonary circulation. The dynamic nature of the pulsatile flow may induce a non-uniformly distributed compliance, with an influence on the methods of measurement.https://doi.org/10.1177/2045894018776882
spellingShingle Frédéric Vanden Eynden
Thierry Bové
Marie-Luce Chirade
Guido Van Nooten
Patrick Segers
Measuring pulmonary arterial compliance: mission impossible? Insights from a novel in vivo continuous-flow based experimental model
Pulmonary Circulation
title Measuring pulmonary arterial compliance: mission impossible? Insights from a novel in vivo continuous-flow based experimental model
title_full Measuring pulmonary arterial compliance: mission impossible? Insights from a novel in vivo continuous-flow based experimental model
title_fullStr Measuring pulmonary arterial compliance: mission impossible? Insights from a novel in vivo continuous-flow based experimental model
title_full_unstemmed Measuring pulmonary arterial compliance: mission impossible? Insights from a novel in vivo continuous-flow based experimental model
title_short Measuring pulmonary arterial compliance: mission impossible? Insights from a novel in vivo continuous-flow based experimental model
title_sort measuring pulmonary arterial compliance mission impossible insights from a novel in vivo continuous flow based experimental model
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2045894018776882
work_keys_str_mv AT fredericvandeneynden measuringpulmonaryarterialcompliancemissionimpossibleinsightsfromanovelinvivocontinuousflowbasedexperimentalmodel
AT thierrybove measuringpulmonaryarterialcompliancemissionimpossibleinsightsfromanovelinvivocontinuousflowbasedexperimentalmodel
AT marielucechirade measuringpulmonaryarterialcompliancemissionimpossibleinsightsfromanovelinvivocontinuousflowbasedexperimentalmodel
AT guidovannooten measuringpulmonaryarterialcompliancemissionimpossibleinsightsfromanovelinvivocontinuousflowbasedexperimentalmodel
AT patricksegers measuringpulmonaryarterialcompliancemissionimpossibleinsightsfromanovelinvivocontinuousflowbasedexperimentalmodel