Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile.

Introduction: The early orthodontic treatment success is based on knowledge the development of the dentition, so measuring their dimensions at different stages of development is considered as a predictor for treatment and rehabilitation of the population. Objective: To explore and evaluate the quant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandra Harnisch, Juan Vargas, Alexandra Torres, Claudia Fierro, Antonieta Pérez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Concepción. 2013-08-01
Series:Journal of Oral Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/33/40
_version_ 1811312746250108928
author Alexandra Harnisch
Juan Vargas
Alexandra Torres
Claudia Fierro
Antonieta Pérez
author_facet Alexandra Harnisch
Juan Vargas
Alexandra Torres
Claudia Fierro
Antonieta Pérez
author_sort Alexandra Harnisch
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The early orthodontic treatment success is based on knowledge the development of the dentition, so measuring their dimensions at different stages of development is considered as a predictor for treatment and rehabilitation of the population. Objective: To explore and evaluate the quantitative characteristics of intercanine and intermolar widths by sex in the population of children of 6-8 years of the Escuela Artistica San Luis de Contulmo. Methodology: quantitative study, non-experimental, cross-sectional, descriptive and correlational. The study population corresponded to 48 students from 6 to 8 years selected by probabilistic sampling, unintentional and opportunistic, to which took study models, measuring and comparing intercanine and intermolar widths. Results: The resulting averages of measurements were: maxillary intercanine 33.2+2.6mm in men and 32.2+2.3mm in women, mandibular intercanine distances respectively 27.1+2.3mm and 26 6+1.9mm, the distance intermolar maxillary 51.9+3.1 and 51.2+3.0mm and the distance mandibular intermolar 46+2.6 and 44.8+3.0mm. Conclusion: In relation to the difference between intercanine and intermolar widths by sex are not significant, in terms of age significant differences between 6 and 8 males but not in females. This study represents an interesting starting point for the analysis and discussion of future research.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T10:42:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fbe0f1d8fe1d424faff86c6a64eddbcd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0719-2460
0719-2479
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T10:42:01Z
publishDate 2013-08-01
publisher Universidad de Concepción.
record_format Article
series Journal of Oral Research
spelling doaj.art-fbe0f1d8fe1d424faff86c6a64eddbcd2022-12-22T02:49:54ZengUniversidad de Concepción.Journal of Oral Research0719-24600719-24792013-08-0122646710.17126/joralres.2013.014Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile.Alexandra Harnisch0Juan Vargas1Alexandra Torres2Claudia Fierro3Antonieta Pérez4Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de Concepción, Chile.Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de Concepción, Chile.Departamento de Información de Salud. Servicio de Salud Concepción, Chile.Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de Concepción, Chile.Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de Concepción, Chile.Introduction: The early orthodontic treatment success is based on knowledge the development of the dentition, so measuring their dimensions at different stages of development is considered as a predictor for treatment and rehabilitation of the population. Objective: To explore and evaluate the quantitative characteristics of intercanine and intermolar widths by sex in the population of children of 6-8 years of the Escuela Artistica San Luis de Contulmo. Methodology: quantitative study, non-experimental, cross-sectional, descriptive and correlational. The study population corresponded to 48 students from 6 to 8 years selected by probabilistic sampling, unintentional and opportunistic, to which took study models, measuring and comparing intercanine and intermolar widths. Results: The resulting averages of measurements were: maxillary intercanine 33.2+2.6mm in men and 32.2+2.3mm in women, mandibular intercanine distances respectively 27.1+2.3mm and 26 6+1.9mm, the distance intermolar maxillary 51.9+3.1 and 51.2+3.0mm and the distance mandibular intermolar 46+2.6 and 44.8+3.0mm. Conclusion: In relation to the difference between intercanine and intermolar widths by sex are not significant, in terms of age significant differences between 6 and 8 males but not in females. This study represents an interesting starting point for the analysis and discussion of future research.http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/33/40Quantitative evaluationtransverse dimensionsArch Dental/anomalies.
spellingShingle Alexandra Harnisch
Juan Vargas
Alexandra Torres
Claudia Fierro
Antonieta Pérez
Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile.
Journal of Oral Research
Quantitative evaluation
transverse dimensions
Arch Dental/anomalies.
title Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile.
title_full Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile.
title_fullStr Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile.
title_short Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile.
title_sort evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition contulmo commune chile
topic Quantitative evaluation
transverse dimensions
Arch Dental/anomalies.
url http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/33/40
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandraharnisch evaluationofintercanineandintermolarwidthsinstudentswithmixeddentitioncontulmocommunechile
AT juanvargas evaluationofintercanineandintermolarwidthsinstudentswithmixeddentitioncontulmocommunechile
AT alexandratorres evaluationofintercanineandintermolarwidthsinstudentswithmixeddentitioncontulmocommunechile
AT claudiafierro evaluationofintercanineandintermolarwidthsinstudentswithmixeddentitioncontulmocommunechile
AT antonietaperez evaluationofintercanineandintermolarwidthsinstudentswithmixeddentitioncontulmocommunechile