Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile.
Introduction: The early orthodontic treatment success is based on knowledge the development of the dentition, so measuring their dimensions at different stages of development is considered as a predictor for treatment and rehabilitation of the population. Objective: To explore and evaluate the quant...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad de Concepción.
2013-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Oral Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/33/40 |
_version_ | 1811312746250108928 |
---|---|
author | Alexandra Harnisch Juan Vargas Alexandra Torres Claudia Fierro Antonieta Pérez |
author_facet | Alexandra Harnisch Juan Vargas Alexandra Torres Claudia Fierro Antonieta Pérez |
author_sort | Alexandra Harnisch |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction: The early orthodontic treatment success is based on knowledge the development of the dentition, so measuring their dimensions at different stages of development is considered as a predictor for treatment and rehabilitation of the population. Objective: To explore and evaluate the quantitative characteristics of intercanine and intermolar widths by sex in the population of children of 6-8 years of the Escuela Artistica San Luis de Contulmo. Methodology: quantitative study, non-experimental, cross-sectional, descriptive and correlational. The study population corresponded to 48 students from 6 to 8 years selected by probabilistic sampling, unintentional and opportunistic, to which took study models, measuring and comparing intercanine and intermolar widths. Results: The resulting averages of measurements were: maxillary intercanine 33.2+2.6mm in men and 32.2+2.3mm in women, mandibular intercanine distances respectively 27.1+2.3mm and 26 6+1.9mm, the distance intermolar maxillary 51.9+3.1 and 51.2+3.0mm and the distance mandibular intermolar 46+2.6 and 44.8+3.0mm. Conclusion: In relation to the difference between intercanine and intermolar widths by sex are not significant, in terms of age significant differences between 6 and 8 males but not in females. This study represents an interesting starting point for the analysis and discussion of future research. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T10:42:01Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-fbe0f1d8fe1d424faff86c6a64eddbcd |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0719-2460 0719-2479 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T10:42:01Z |
publishDate | 2013-08-01 |
publisher | Universidad de Concepción. |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Oral Research |
spelling | doaj.art-fbe0f1d8fe1d424faff86c6a64eddbcd2022-12-22T02:49:54ZengUniversidad de Concepción.Journal of Oral Research0719-24600719-24792013-08-0122646710.17126/joralres.2013.014Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile.Alexandra Harnisch0Juan Vargas1Alexandra Torres2Claudia Fierro3Antonieta Pérez4Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de Concepción, Chile.Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de Concepción, Chile.Departamento de Información de Salud. Servicio de Salud Concepción, Chile.Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de Concepción, Chile.Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de Concepción, Chile.Introduction: The early orthodontic treatment success is based on knowledge the development of the dentition, so measuring their dimensions at different stages of development is considered as a predictor for treatment and rehabilitation of the population. Objective: To explore and evaluate the quantitative characteristics of intercanine and intermolar widths by sex in the population of children of 6-8 years of the Escuela Artistica San Luis de Contulmo. Methodology: quantitative study, non-experimental, cross-sectional, descriptive and correlational. The study population corresponded to 48 students from 6 to 8 years selected by probabilistic sampling, unintentional and opportunistic, to which took study models, measuring and comparing intercanine and intermolar widths. Results: The resulting averages of measurements were: maxillary intercanine 33.2+2.6mm in men and 32.2+2.3mm in women, mandibular intercanine distances respectively 27.1+2.3mm and 26 6+1.9mm, the distance intermolar maxillary 51.9+3.1 and 51.2+3.0mm and the distance mandibular intermolar 46+2.6 and 44.8+3.0mm. Conclusion: In relation to the difference between intercanine and intermolar widths by sex are not significant, in terms of age significant differences between 6 and 8 males but not in females. This study represents an interesting starting point for the analysis and discussion of future research.http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/33/40Quantitative evaluationtransverse dimensionsArch Dental/anomalies. |
spellingShingle | Alexandra Harnisch Juan Vargas Alexandra Torres Claudia Fierro Antonieta Pérez Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile. Journal of Oral Research Quantitative evaluation transverse dimensions Arch Dental/anomalies. |
title | Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile. |
title_full | Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile. |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile. |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile. |
title_short | Evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition, Contulmo Commune, Chile. |
title_sort | evaluation of intercanine and intermolar widths in students with mixed dentition contulmo commune chile |
topic | Quantitative evaluation transverse dimensions Arch Dental/anomalies. |
url | http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/33/40 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexandraharnisch evaluationofintercanineandintermolarwidthsinstudentswithmixeddentitioncontulmocommunechile AT juanvargas evaluationofintercanineandintermolarwidthsinstudentswithmixeddentitioncontulmocommunechile AT alexandratorres evaluationofintercanineandintermolarwidthsinstudentswithmixeddentitioncontulmocommunechile AT claudiafierro evaluationofintercanineandintermolarwidthsinstudentswithmixeddentitioncontulmocommunechile AT antonietaperez evaluationofintercanineandintermolarwidthsinstudentswithmixeddentitioncontulmocommunechile |