A Multi-Party Imaginary Dialogue about Power and Cybernetics

This paper is written as a multi-sided dialogue intended to present a number of ideas about power. Some of these ideas are my own, expressed in a kind of evolutionary idiom of adaptation though they were partly developed in reaction to Foucault (and are far more indebted to Foucault and cybernetics...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Phillip Guddemi
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: ARINA, Inc. 2010-03-01
Series:Integral Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.integral-review.org/documents/Guddemi,%20Power%20and%20Cybernetics%20Vol.%206%20No.%201.pdf
_version_ 1811308231824244736
author Phillip Guddemi
author_facet Phillip Guddemi
author_sort Phillip Guddemi
collection DOAJ
description This paper is written as a multi-sided dialogue intended to present a number of ideas about power. Some of these ideas are my own, expressed in a kind of evolutionary idiom of adaptation though they were partly developed in reaction to Foucault (and are far more indebted to Foucault and cybernetics than to contemporary evolutionist thinking). There is a deep irony in that my way of thinking is primarily rooted in the cybernetic anthropology of Gregory Bateson; however, he was deeply skeptical of the concept of power. My personification of him in this dialogue, as “Bateson,” demonstrates this skepticism and brings into the discussion other relevant ideas of his. The third participant in the dialogue, Mary Midgley, is included because her consideration of Hobbes’ ideas leads us to consider yet another, probabilistic, way of thinking about power.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T09:19:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fbe5c9f8cd1646de948a50807799b51b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1553-3069
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-13T09:19:30Z
publishDate 2010-03-01
publisher ARINA, Inc.
record_format Article
series Integral Review
spelling doaj.art-fbe5c9f8cd1646de948a50807799b51b2022-12-22T02:52:40ZdeuARINA, Inc.Integral Review1553-30692010-03-0161197207A Multi-Party Imaginary Dialogue about Power and CyberneticsPhillip GuddemiThis paper is written as a multi-sided dialogue intended to present a number of ideas about power. Some of these ideas are my own, expressed in a kind of evolutionary idiom of adaptation though they were partly developed in reaction to Foucault (and are far more indebted to Foucault and cybernetics than to contemporary evolutionist thinking). There is a deep irony in that my way of thinking is primarily rooted in the cybernetic anthropology of Gregory Bateson; however, he was deeply skeptical of the concept of power. My personification of him in this dialogue, as “Bateson,” demonstrates this skepticism and brings into the discussion other relevant ideas of his. The third participant in the dialogue, Mary Midgley, is included because her consideration of Hobbes’ ideas leads us to consider yet another, probabilistic, way of thinking about power.http://www.integral-review.org/documents/Guddemi,%20Power%20and%20Cybernetics%20Vol.%206%20No.%201.pdfAdaptationepistemologypower
spellingShingle Phillip Guddemi
A Multi-Party Imaginary Dialogue about Power and Cybernetics
Integral Review
Adaptation
epistemology
power
title A Multi-Party Imaginary Dialogue about Power and Cybernetics
title_full A Multi-Party Imaginary Dialogue about Power and Cybernetics
title_fullStr A Multi-Party Imaginary Dialogue about Power and Cybernetics
title_full_unstemmed A Multi-Party Imaginary Dialogue about Power and Cybernetics
title_short A Multi-Party Imaginary Dialogue about Power and Cybernetics
title_sort multi party imaginary dialogue about power and cybernetics
topic Adaptation
epistemology
power
url http://www.integral-review.org/documents/Guddemi,%20Power%20and%20Cybernetics%20Vol.%206%20No.%201.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipguddemi amultipartyimaginarydialogueaboutpowerandcybernetics
AT phillipguddemi multipartyimaginarydialogueaboutpowerandcybernetics