Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification
Abstract Background To compare femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification in terms of visual and refractive outcomes, cumulative dissipated energy, anterior chamber inflammation and endothelial cell loss. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, records of eyes that underw...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2018-04-01
|
| Series: | Eye and Vision |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40662-018-0102-5 |
| _version_ | 1828522245951062016 |
|---|---|
| author | Robert Edward Ty Ang Michelle Marie Salcedo Quinto Emerson Marquez Cruz Mark Christian Reyes Rivera Gladness Henna Austria Martinez |
| author_facet | Robert Edward Ty Ang Michelle Marie Salcedo Quinto Emerson Marquez Cruz Mark Christian Reyes Rivera Gladness Henna Austria Martinez |
| author_sort | Robert Edward Ty Ang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background To compare femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification in terms of visual and refractive outcomes, cumulative dissipated energy, anterior chamber inflammation and endothelial cell loss. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, records of eyes that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) or conventional phacoemulsification (CP) were reviewed. The Victus femtosecond laser (Bausch and Lomb, Germany) was used to carry out corneal incisions, anterior capsulotomy, and lens fragmentation in FLACS procedures. Manifest refraction spherical equivalence (MRSE), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), postoperative cells and flare and endothelial cell count data were collected. Subgroup analysis of the visual acuity tests was performed based on the type of intraocular lens implanted (monofocal, monofocal toric, multifocal, multifocal toric, accommodating). Results A total of 735 eyes were included in the study (296 eyes for the FLACS group and 439 eyes for the CP group). At one year follow-up, 120 eyes comprised the FLACS group and 265 eyes for the CP group. MRSE in the FLACS group was − 0.16 ± 0.58 D and − 0.20 ± 0.52 D in the CP group (P = 0.50). UDVA in the FLACS group was 20/25 (mean logMAR 0.12 ± 0.13) and 20/25 (mean logMAR 0.11 ± 0.13) in the CP group (P = 0.48). CDVA was 20/20 (mean logMAR 0.03 ± 0.07) in the FLACS group and 20/20 (mean logMAR 0.02 ± 0.06) in the CP group (P = 0.15). No statistically significant trend was seen for FLACS versus CP by intraocular type for visual acuity. CDE for the different cataract grades ranged from 6.97 ± 5.74 to 29.02 ± 16.07 in the FLACS group and 7.59 ± 6.42 to 35.69 ± 18.30 in the CP group. The FLACS group was significantly lower for post-operative central corneal edema (P = 0.05), cells and flare (P = 0.01), and endothelial cell loss (P = 0.04). Conclusions Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification had similar refractive and visual outcomes. Phacoemulsification energy, anterior chamber inflammation and corneal endothelial cell loss were less in the femtosecond laser group. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T20:04:11Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-fbe9eff32a214c5988b66b2a044ee629 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2326-0254 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T20:04:11Z |
| publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Eye and Vision |
| spelling | doaj.art-fbe9eff32a214c5988b66b2a044ee6292022-12-22T00:52:27ZengBMCEye and Vision2326-02542018-04-015111310.1186/s40662-018-0102-5Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsificationRobert Edward Ty Ang0Michelle Marie Salcedo Quinto1Emerson Marquez Cruz2Mark Christian Reyes Rivera3Gladness Henna Austria Martinez4Asian Eye Institute, Rockwell CenterCardinal Santos Medical CenterAsian Eye Institute, Rockwell CenterAsian Eye Institute, Rockwell CenterCardinal Santos Medical CenterAbstract Background To compare femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification in terms of visual and refractive outcomes, cumulative dissipated energy, anterior chamber inflammation and endothelial cell loss. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, records of eyes that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) or conventional phacoemulsification (CP) were reviewed. The Victus femtosecond laser (Bausch and Lomb, Germany) was used to carry out corneal incisions, anterior capsulotomy, and lens fragmentation in FLACS procedures. Manifest refraction spherical equivalence (MRSE), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), postoperative cells and flare and endothelial cell count data were collected. Subgroup analysis of the visual acuity tests was performed based on the type of intraocular lens implanted (monofocal, monofocal toric, multifocal, multifocal toric, accommodating). Results A total of 735 eyes were included in the study (296 eyes for the FLACS group and 439 eyes for the CP group). At one year follow-up, 120 eyes comprised the FLACS group and 265 eyes for the CP group. MRSE in the FLACS group was − 0.16 ± 0.58 D and − 0.20 ± 0.52 D in the CP group (P = 0.50). UDVA in the FLACS group was 20/25 (mean logMAR 0.12 ± 0.13) and 20/25 (mean logMAR 0.11 ± 0.13) in the CP group (P = 0.48). CDVA was 20/20 (mean logMAR 0.03 ± 0.07) in the FLACS group and 20/20 (mean logMAR 0.02 ± 0.06) in the CP group (P = 0.15). No statistically significant trend was seen for FLACS versus CP by intraocular type for visual acuity. CDE for the different cataract grades ranged from 6.97 ± 5.74 to 29.02 ± 16.07 in the FLACS group and 7.59 ± 6.42 to 35.69 ± 18.30 in the CP group. The FLACS group was significantly lower for post-operative central corneal edema (P = 0.05), cells and flare (P = 0.01), and endothelial cell loss (P = 0.04). Conclusions Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification had similar refractive and visual outcomes. Phacoemulsification energy, anterior chamber inflammation and corneal endothelial cell loss were less in the femtosecond laser group.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40662-018-0102-5Femtosecond laserPhacoemulsificationCataractCumulative dissipated energyEndothelial cell lossFlare |
| spellingShingle | Robert Edward Ty Ang Michelle Marie Salcedo Quinto Emerson Marquez Cruz Mark Christian Reyes Rivera Gladness Henna Austria Martinez Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification Eye and Vision Femtosecond laser Phacoemulsification Cataract Cumulative dissipated energy Endothelial cell loss Flare |
| title | Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification |
| title_full | Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification |
| title_short | Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification |
| title_sort | comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification |
| topic | Femtosecond laser Phacoemulsification Cataract Cumulative dissipated energy Endothelial cell loss Flare |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40662-018-0102-5 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT robertedwardtyang comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedversusconventionalphacoemulsification AT michellemariesalcedoquinto comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedversusconventionalphacoemulsification AT emersonmarquezcruz comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedversusconventionalphacoemulsification AT markchristianreyesrivera comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedversusconventionalphacoemulsification AT gladnesshennaaustriamartinez comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedversusconventionalphacoemulsification |